can we have !!!

[guncrasher]

could swear that's what I read when the B29 was added

ah never said no to the b29.  but they have said no to the nuke.


semp

[dirtdart]

So, it took the entire resources of a war economy to produce two viable weapons.  If introduced, how frequently would they be allowed, what conditions on the map would support the industry to construct the bombs, who would pay the perks for them , who would choose the targets for the two bombs, which of the three countries would get the two bombs, how would it enhance game play, etc....  all thing that need to be fleshed out beofre a post.

[ink]

well my idea was a concept that eze said , that the reason why players jump is to get quick perks if a nuke was introduced with a 90 min delivery corridor , and and a 30 min decent corridor that is 2 hours , and most players who swop and change have ants in there pants and get board , but if a nuke was introduced they would be itching to try it out , as they would have the perks available to do so , and would want to stay fot 2 hours on that particular country , and if there mission was succesful , that may give them the ego to stay in that country , as they had just caused so much destruction to there adjecent country they were attacking  

you are obviously listing to someone who has no clue at all.

[TheMercinary60]

So, it took the entire resources of a war economy to produce two viable weapons.  If introduced, how frequently would they be allowed, what conditions on the map would support the industry to construct the bombs, who would pay the perks for them , who would choose the targets for the two bombs, which of the three countries would get the two bombs, how would it enhance game play, etc....  all thing that need to be fleshed out beofre a post.

actually for the sake of historical accuracy, they produced three, you have to remember the test bomb. maybe four, for some reason i want to think that they had another on tinian ready to go when japan surrendered

[davidwales]

well ive though of that one as well each country is allocated two bombs per night , and every one chips in to the perks , htc could have the bombs in the hanger of the b29 , with a little ticker and every player could chip in a few perks untill the kitty was full , at the same time , they put a poll vote that would be in o club of the pilot and co pilot they want , when the kitty reaches 100 per cent , the bomb is unlocked for use , and the poll of all pilots come up , the kitty would also supply the perks for the b29 also, so all the pilots would be in cronilogical order, pilot co pilot , nose gunner , side gunner and so on .that would be the crew  

[davidwales]

for example if the total value of the 29 and a nuke was 600 perks and ink put in 350 perks he would become a/c, and anyone else putting in would become weapon handerlers .

[DaCoon]

ah never said no to the b29.  but they have said no to the nuke.


semp

I know AH never said no to the B29.  I was one who voted for it.  I was just saying that when the B29 was added, HT said the nuke would not be part of the game. IIRC            

[RTHolmes]

I have squaddies with 10-50,000 bomber perks, there must be plenty of others out there with 10 years worth of buff booty, so a nuke would have to have to be perked in the 10,000s range, not that it will ever happen.

always amuses me that the guys who request teh nook would never realistically be able to afford one. the closest they would get to seeing one is a blinding flash before they hit the tower.



edit: I just had an image of Tunes's face as he turns 5 different bases to glass at the same time

[davidwales]

proberly because they thought it might destroy the entire arena within a hour , but if it was done the way i have just said , only 2 warheads could be detonated per 24 hours , then they respawn , and that it was a high perk , and a slow delivery time then it would become a legit and tacticul weapon , for example if you have some hothead who piles his perks in for a/c position of the b29 , then he may not be able to do the same tommorow , but it is up to the a/c to decide what is the target  

[RTHolmes]

how would that improve gameplay for eveyone?

[davidwales]

thats why i suggested a 2 bomb per country per 24 hours in any one arena and a ticker in the hanger for squadies to chip in highest pay master is a/c and after 24 hours of detonation it respawns back in b29 hanger 

[RTHolmes]

yes, but how would that improve gameplay for everyone? 

[davidwales]

well it wouldnt if you happen to be defending a v base for example, and the target was that v base , but it is a fair concept and easily applied to all arenas , proberley easier than doing the art work on a new aircraft , the blast radius would be 5 mile radius that would proberly hit 1 vbase and a half if they were those ones together , plus if that second base was in the shelter of a hill etc the blast would be reduced by 70 per cent if within the 5 mile circle  

[davidwales]

the gameplay for everyone is having the chance to nuke a base if you can afford it , if you cant you can chip in and be a crew member gunner 

[caldera]

sorry didnt know that, please keep posting away.  I want to learn more.  I for one will support your ideas from now on as I was mistaken in the past.  you still suporting my idea for the "spruce goose" to be added right?  imagine 750 paratroopers in the sky raining down over a town  .  gives a new meaning to the "it's raining men" theme.



semp

+1 fore teh sprooceguce and awl davidwhails grate ideis guyz!

hay we shuld nook teh sideswichers for treeson!  tey did it in teh war!!!!!!!!