« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: SU-152  (Read 961 times)

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: SU-152
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2012, 01:46:31 PM »
Quote from: bangsbox on February 16, 2012, 08:09:50 PM
nope, german 128mm was better not to mention american 16incher lol

I meant GVs not Battleships.
Logged
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: SU-152
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2012, 03:58:37 PM »
Quote from: Rich52 on February 17, 2012, 01:46:31 PM
I meant GVs not Battleships.


ya ya i figured
:P

look up karl moser "thor" "loki" and "odin"
Logged

Offline kilo2

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3445
Re: SU-152
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2012, 04:19:23 PM »
With the Su-152 the guns round could take the top off a tiger. The pressure alone of the exploding round could kill the entire crew of the tiger.
Logged
X.O. Kommando Nowotny
FlyKommando.com

"Never abandon the possibility of attack."

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
Re: SU-152
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2012, 04:30:27 PM »
Currently grinding the Su-152 in WoT!
Logged

Offline SELECTOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2742
      • http://www.332viking.com
Re: SU-152
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2012, 07:36:26 AM »
as always the HTC community DATA BASE has come up trumps.
thanks for pics and info :aok
Logged

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: SU-152
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2012, 09:09:14 AM »
The Su-152 would be at a great disadvantage in AH.  It's lack of turret and horrid reload rate (projectile and powder charge) would be the death of it.

The Su-100 would be a better fit for AH, imo.  Fast reload rate and a superior AP capability would at least give it a chance.

I maintain the Su-100 or StuG III would be the best of the "turret-less" AFV's to be added to the game first.  Both would be at a disadvantage from the get go because of the lack of a turret and the lack of 0° pivot capability (can't pivot in place).     
Logged
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Big Rat

  • AH Training Corps
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
Re: SU-152
« Reply #21 on: February 21, 2012, 11:12:35 PM »
Quote from: SmokinLoon on February 20, 2012, 09:09:14 AM
The Su-152 would be at a great disadvantage in AH.  It's lack of turret and horrid reload rate (projectile and powder charge) would be the death of it.

The Su-100 would be a better fit for AH, imo.  Fast reload rate and a superior AP capability would at least give it a chance.

I maintain the Su-100 or StuG III would be the best of the "turret-less" AFV's to be added to the game first.  Both would be at a disadvantage from the get go because of the lack of a turret and the lack of 0° pivot capability (can't pivot in place).     

Wouldn't it be easiest to add a Jagdpanther first.  Panther Chassis with TigerII's gun, both already in game.  Definitly a perked animal, but should be easy to add.  Albeit we could really use a Stug first.

 :salute
BigRat
Logged
When you think the fight might be going bad, it already has.
Becoming one with the Hog, is to become one with Greatness, VF-17 XO & training officer BigRat

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: SU-152
« Reply #22 on: February 22, 2012, 12:07:25 AM »
Quote from: SmokinLoon on February 20, 2012, 09:09:14 AM
The Su-152 would be at a great disadvantage in AH.  It's lack of turret and horrid reload rate (projectile and powder charge) would be the death of it.

The Su-100 would be a better fit for AH, imo.  Fast reload rate and a superior AP capability would at least give it a chance.

I maintain the Su-100 or StuG III would be the best of the "turret-less" AFV's to be added to the game first.  Both would be at a disadvantage from the get go because of the lack of a turret and the lack of 0° pivot capability (can't pivot in place).     

Most claimed the M-18 was a great disadvantage in Aces High, as much as annoying a turret-less AFV would be in aces high, they served in combat in huge numbers and played a role.

I've been wanting the Jagdpanzer IV and L/70 models, one has a L/48 (same gun on a Panzer 4) other has a Panthers gun, turretless of course. However the extremely low silhouette would make it a very tough target to hit, with pretty good armor up front.

Tanking comes down to tactics, if used correctly tank hunters can do their job quite well as any other tank, just without a turret.

Logged
JG 52
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »