Author Topic: new airplanes  (Read 2131 times)

Offline scottak

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2012, 10:21:19 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

 :aok

And +1 on the op things that could be added. :)
i know right? first we were talking about my suggestion that seemingly every one hates and now we are talking about what i am studying!

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2012, 10:24:19 PM »

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2012, 11:37:30 PM »
Just want to say, the Tiger II had 6" of armor on the glacis plate (150mm is about 6") and about 7" on the turret (180mm is about 7").
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2012, 02:30:21 AM »
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2012, 06:57:00 AM »
You do realize to get into Oxford as an American, It's not what you know but who you know, right?

If you want to be a nuke, M.I.T or Embry Riddle have great quantum programs, and are worlds easier to get into than Oxford.


Anyways, I give a +1 to the new planes, but exhaust flames would have to be a side project I think because we don't have night in the MA. Also, it would probably have to be an optional graphics enhancement, because most people wouldn't be able to run it on their system.
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline superpug1

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 929
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2012, 07:30:31 AM »
ERAU's Quantum physics program is...ok.

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #36 on: March 05, 2012, 07:52:41 AM »
ERAU's Quantum physics program is...ok.

It still gets you the degree though. Even with an Oxford degree you'll still find it hard to get a job, especially in that field.
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #37 on: March 05, 2012, 09:36:07 AM »
... can predict outcomes of certain situations. i just cant prove them yet.

 :headscratch:

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #38 on: March 05, 2012, 09:39:32 AM »
... and now we are talking about what i am studying!

Um, you went there. Other's used it as an example of contradictive extrapolation. It's ok. You'll get there. You're about the same age as my youngest step-son and he's right about everything .... he just can't prove it, either.  :D

Offline superpug1

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 929
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #39 on: March 05, 2012, 08:26:49 PM »
That's certainly true about that degree field. I went to Riddle out in AZ. I majored in Security and Intel Studies with a minor in asian studies and a concentration in Chinese. The USAF decided I should be a pilot instead of a intel officer. Who was I to complain :)

Offline matt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1136
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #40 on: March 06, 2012, 11:01:18 AM »
To my post that we should see gouges and dents in the armour for shell impacts: There are many pictures on google images of king tigers with gouges the size of coconuts where a sherman's 75mm shells actually glanced off the 5 inch. armour. They were at least 2-3 inches deep into the 7 in. armour of the king tiger ( it was actualy 5 in. thick, but with the 40 degree slope, it was 7 in.).
way to much to ask for, still waiting on the 410  :furious

Offline 4Prop

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #41 on: March 07, 2012, 03:52:39 PM »
I believe that there should be gummy bears in the game. I think there should also be gummy bears and a M1 105mm howitzer. Also, when you hit any bags of gummy bears, there should be dents and gouges in the plastic of the bag of gummy bears. And when you fly at night, you  should be able to see the gummy bear  flames coming out the exhaust pipes.

 :noid

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #42 on: March 07, 2012, 05:29:52 PM »

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #43 on: March 07, 2012, 05:37:11 PM »
That's certainly true about that degree field. I went to Riddle out in AZ. I majored in Security and Intel Studies with a minor in asian studies and a concentration in Chinese. The USAF decided I should be a pilot instead of a intel officer. Who was I to complain :)

You were probably a saint in a past life, how else could you get that kind of luck, lol

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline matt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1136
Re: new airplanes
« Reply #44 on: March 07, 2012, 06:24:57 PM »
No, spelling looks good.
I told davidwales to use spell check. i'm thinking maybe their related
brother from another mother.