« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Aerial Victories  (Read 1624 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2012, 06:56:06 PM »
Quote from: Guppy35 on March 11, 2012, 06:19:24 PM
Twas an exaggeration :)

Anyone landing more then 5 I'm going to figure it was not air combat anyway

Semp the in a war comment nullifies it for this discussion as there is no actual risk for us.
But....I did 12 in the air on one clip of ammo in the A6M5 once......


Seriously though, this is a bad idea.  Ack huggers are already too common.  Don't make it so that they also deny you a kill.  Conversely, I want credit for killing a vulture when I up from a base under attack.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 06:59:26 PM by Karnak »
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11328
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2012, 07:01:16 PM »
Quote from: Guppy35 on March 11, 2012, 06:19:24 PM
Twas an exaggeration :)

Anyone landing more then 5 I'm going to figure it was not air combat anyway

Semp the in a war comment nullifies it for this discussion as there is no actual risk for us.


I dont know, I have loads of memories and some films of 2-3 hour sorties spanning 5-6 sectors and reaching quite high victories. Sorties that saw the ebb and flow of numerous missions, furballs and strategic plays from a vantage point of imagined realism. Flying home to rearm with a few scalps whilst plotting a cross country flight to get to a new fight with another refuel on the way. Those are some of the most exciting and immersive memories I have in from the main arena.
Logged
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2012, 08:35:50 PM »
Quote from: Guppy35 on March 11, 2012, 06:19:24 PM
Twas an exaggeration :)

Anyone landing more then 5 I'm going to figure it was not air combat anyway

Semp the in a war comment nullifies it for this discussion as there is no actual risk for us.

just making a comment when somebody makes a reference thinking that back in the ware there was such thing as "honor" in the way some people think of it in aces high.  they would pick, run, ho, vulch do whatever it took to destroy airplanes and make it back alive to fight another day  :salute.




semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2012, 10:06:31 PM »
Quote from: guncrasher on March 11, 2012, 08:35:50 PM
just making a comment when somebody makes a reference thinking that back in the ware there was such thing as "honor" in the way some people think of it in aces high.  they would pick, run, ho, vulch do whatever it took to destroy airplanes and make it back alive to fight another day  :salute.




semp

^QFT
Logged

Offline DMVIAGRA

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 321
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2012, 06:18:06 AM »
Hey have you seen a 109T before?

I think it has longer wings, what's your opinion Shida?
Logged

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2012, 07:53:58 AM »
I like grass airfields, remote sites. Plenty of examples of this during the war. Maybe it comes with some limitations, like certain planes, or X amount of uppers at one time, easier to take these fields down.

For those horde efforts to take fields, they would not only have to cap a field, and take down the town, with this they would also have to take out a few remote strips. This would include first finding them, maybe icon range is 2k or so, then hitting them.

Maybe these remote strips are not found at every airbase, just as we have a few ports that have airfields, some bases do, some do not. And maybe before a base is captured all grass fields/remote strips have to be identified and destroyed.

I like this idea. +1

Boo
Logged
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2012, 09:00:00 AM »
Quote from: DMVIAGRA on March 12, 2012, 06:18:06 AM
I think it has longer wings, what's your opinion Shida?

I think it's marvellous, I believe the flaps are longer too looking at your picture  :rock
Logged
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2012, 01:26:29 PM »
Quote from: nrshida on March 11, 2012, 06:56:00 AM
If an aircraft has its wheels on the ground and is shot then should the game award a victory?



Awarded a kill yes.  Is a victory a new category of score? :headscratch:
Logged
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2012, 01:58:16 PM »
Didn't the 8th AF count kills on the ground as victories towards the end of the war?

ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline surfinn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 733
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2012, 02:10:52 PM »
The grass field Idea reminds me of the engineers wish I posted a couple of months ago. +1
Logged

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2012, 02:21:35 PM »
Quote from: waystin2 on March 12, 2012, 01:26:29 PM
Awarded a kill yes.  Is a victory a new category of score? :headscratch:

I thought the system messages call it 'Victory'.
Logged
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2012, 02:22:57 PM »
didn't the 109T operate off a carrier  or was it only in Norway?   
Logged
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Lab Rat 3947

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #27 on: March 13, 2012, 12:56:12 AM »
Quote
Didn't the 8th AF count kills on the ground as victories towards the end of the war?


Yes.  :old:
Logged
LtngRydr
14th FG Grounded

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2012, 04:08:46 AM »
Quote from: Bruv119 on March 12, 2012, 02:22:57 PM
didn't the 109T operate off a carrier  or was it only in Norway?   

No carriers. But even if it had, if it wheels were on the deck, the SYSTEM would have surely not awarded a kill in the war  :old:
Logged
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Aerial Victories
« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2012, 04:15:07 AM »
"didn't the 109T operate off a carrier or was it only in Norway?"

It was also used as a night fighter over Germany in Wilde Sau operations. Not sure how widely but I have seen it mentioned.

-C+
Logged
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »