« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: P-63 Performance  (Read 5704 times)

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
P-63 Performance
« on: March 13, 2012, 11:33:57 PM »
Considering that the P-63A was really a mid-war fighter (1943), it would offer fearsome low to medium altitude performance that would be great fun in Aces High... Check out this chart. The La-7 will have met its match. 384 mph at sea level with water injection.... Add to that a 5,000 fpm climb rate at sea level, 4,750 fpm at 5k... With a lower wing loading than the P-39Q, it should turn well too.


Logged
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2012, 11:36:48 PM »
+1 though I think we'll read comments about too many US birds.

I was at a museum in California and took a couple picks of this bird. I'll find them and post it. Seemed small, big gun in the front.

Boo
Logged
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2012, 11:37:40 PM »
Here's a chart for the P-39Q-30, and our P-39Q doesn't come close to the 410 mph at 10k as illustrated on this chart...


Logged
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2012, 11:41:03 PM »
Here's a chart for the P-39Q-25. A bit slower than the -30, but still much faster than the Aces High version... Hey HiTech, how about an upgrade based upon this data? Current performance is correct for the P-39Q-5, by the way....

« Last Edit: March 13, 2012, 11:43:38 PM by Widewing »
Logged
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2012, 11:50:29 PM »
I got some pictures of the only flying example in San Marcos





Logged
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2012, 01:56:57 AM »
Wait...
those charts say, the P39 Q-25 was drastically different from the AH version, like 25-30mph faster (!)
Im not a fan of this bird, but if it would be faster, it might be more popular in the MA, bringing some variety to the spit16/la7/ponyD world.
So i think it would be a good idea to change it from the Q-5 to the Q25/30, as we already have an early war, much slower P39, the D model.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2012, 04:29:57 AM by Debrody »
Logged
AoM
City of ice

Offline Mitsu.

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2012, 04:26:00 AM »
Quote
384 mph at sea level with water injection.... Add to that a 5,000 fpm climb rate at sea level

Really...the kingcobra is really king! :O
Logged

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2012, 07:14:42 AM »
interesting! later P39 versions would be a good start  :aok
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2012, 11:06:12 AM »
A perked plane for sure. But then Axis need either a G.55 or a Do-335 or even a He-162. A guy can dream can't he? :)
Logged
Quote from: guncrasher on August 16, 2012, 04:48:31 AM

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #9 on: March 14, 2012, 11:25:59 AM »
Quote from: titanic3 on March 14, 2012, 11:06:12 AM
A perked plane for sure. But then Axis need either a G.55 or a Do-335 or even a He-162. A guy can dream can't he? :)
Why?  If the P-63 were added the Axis would not need anything.  The P-63 would be balanced by the P-63 on the other side.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2012, 11:54:48 AM »
G.55 isn't overwhelming in any situation except firepower, with 3x 20mm MG151's and a pair of breta 50 cals.

Otherwise its simply a decent mid/late war ride that's not special in any sense.
Logged
JG 52

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8998
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2012, 12:06:42 PM »
Quote from: Butcher on March 14, 2012, 11:54:48 AM
G.55 isn't overwhelming in any situation except firepower, with 3x 20mm MG151's and a pair of breta 50 cals.

Otherwise its simply a decent mid/late war ride that's not special in any sense.
Yes but the G.55 is so sexy, which is more than you can say for any p-39/63.
Logged
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #12 on: March 14, 2012, 12:37:02 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on March 14, 2012, 11:25:59 AM
Why?  If the P-63 were added the Axis would not need anything.  The P-63 would be balanced by the P-63 on the other side.

Because We have enoug American planes for now.
Logged
Quote from: guncrasher on August 16, 2012, 04:48:31 AM

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #13 on: March 14, 2012, 01:18:56 PM »
Quote from: titanic3 on March 14, 2012, 12:37:02 PM
Because We have enoug American planes for now.
Americans didn't fly this one. Not to combat that is.
It is a Russian plane made in America.
Logged
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-63 Performance
« Reply #14 on: March 14, 2012, 02:57:37 PM »
Quote from: titanic3 on March 14, 2012, 12:37:02 PM
Because We have enoug American planes for now.
That has nothing to do with stating that if x side gets a plane then y side will need one too.

______________

Personally I don't want to see the P-63 because, if the numbers are accurate, it will simply be another plane that people run away in.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »