Author Topic: Carriers!  (Read 818 times)

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2012, 05:37:48 PM »
The only catapults in operation during WWII were for seaplanes or light recon aircraft, where most returned to their ship after launching, landed in the water, and were then hoisted/fetched via crane out of the water and back aboard the ship.  (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Bermuda_(52) )

Not true.  The Enterprise had a hangar deck catapult that launched the aircraft out of the side (there's a pic of a Wildcat being launched), it wasn't used much, just didn't work all that well.

There are several WWII era pics of Corsairs being catapult launched.

Their use on CVs was limited during WWII.

Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2012, 07:05:26 PM »
A catapult might make me spill my beer -1

Offline Hamltnblue

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2012, 11:12:43 AM »
From what I see it looks like the catapults weren't in place to allow heavier aircraft launch, but to allow for shorter take-offs. This would free up a large portion of flight deck for storage, prep, and maybe even landing.
Having cataults in AH would slow things down. With long waiting lines since only 1 or 2 could launch at a time.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2012, 11:17:01 AM »
From what I see it looks like the catapults weren't in place to allow heavier aircraft launch, but to allow for shorter take-offs. This would free up a large portion of flight deck for storage, prep, and maybe even landing.
Having cataults in AH would slow things down. With long waiting lines since only 1 or 2 could launch at a time.

Common sense has reported to this thread. :)

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2012, 11:31:26 AM »
From what I see it looks like the catapults weren't in place to allow heavier aircraft launch, but to allow for shorter take-offs. This would free up a large portion of flight deck for storage, prep, and maybe even landing.
Having cataults in AH would slow things down. With long waiting lines since only 1 or 2 could launch at a time.
so.... perfect for scenario use then? :aok


and as said before 40% of launches were using catapults
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2012, 11:52:57 AM »
so.... perfect for scenario use then? :aok


Are you thinking this through? Simulating launch and form up can be tried without the cat by spacing out the launches. I'm fairly certain that would go over like a lead balloon.  :aok

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Carriers!
« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2012, 05:45:46 PM »
Are you thinking this through? Simulating launch and form up can be tried without the cat by spacing out the launches. I'm fairly certain that would go over like a lead balloon.  :aok
lead balloons fly!!! :bolt:
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy