Author Topic: Photographers, suggestions requested.  (Read 721 times)

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2012, 07:31:44 AM »
This is something i've kind of wanted to get into since I was 14, how would I as a 16 year old be recommended to start into this?

My opinion on starting - Get a camera, any camera, and start taking pictures.  Seriously.  That is step one, shooting lots of photos and seeing what works and what doesn't.  

AFTER you start shooting (maybe 5 seconds later) go to the library (either a real library or search online) and read everything you can find about photography.  When you start reading, start with the basics on subjects like what shutter speed and aperture mean, then go from there.  You can read about composition but don't get obsessed with setting up shots until you pretty much instinctively know how the picture will turn out anyhow, based on lighting and other conditions.

The only way to get that feel for how a shot will come out is to just take lots of pictures.  And you can do that with almost ANY camera.

After a while, you will want a camera that lets you change settings.  But you don't need an SLR to start out.  You can "get into photography" with a camera phone if you really had to, but I'd suggest a regular digital camera that lets you fiddle with basic settings so you can experiment and decide what you want your second camera to be able to do.

Eventually you will want to get into photo processing, since that's one way to adjust for camera limitations and turn a good photo into a great one.  You can start with free utilities (Like GIMP) but I think that a large number of books and online guides will assume you're using some version of photoshop or another commercial program.  You do not NEED to pay a lot for photo editing utilities especially as you learn how to do this stuff, but if you get into it to make money you will probably eventually pay for some serious software.

Oh yea, almost forgot...  Although you should still start snapping pictures TODAY with whatever you have, one big investment you will eventually want to do is a good computer monitor for image processing.  The cheap "TN" based LCD monitors are horrible for color reproduction and the colors change when you move your head in front of the screen.  You will probably want an IPS based screen.  There are some new slightly cheaper "IPS" panels that aren't quite as good as the best IPS panels but they cost half as much.  A cheap 20-24" TN panel will cost less than $200, a really nice IPS screen will cost anywhere from $400-$700, but some of the newer cheaper IPS ones can be as low as $350ish.  You need to be SURE what panel you are getting before you buy, because while the cheap ones are never IPS, sometimes they will sneak a TN panel into a more expensive monitor.  If the specs do not specifically say "IPS", you're probably getting a TN panel no matter what the price.  Also, you will want to get some sort of color calibration device.  I got a "spyder elite pro" for a bit over $100 that does the job just fine.  Some of the better monitors now come calibrated from the factory, but I think most computer monitors are not calibrated at all so they need to be calibrated before using them for any sort of photography work.  My IPS screens came with way too much red saturation so skin tones looked almost cartoonish.  After calibration they looked great.

Very few laptops have IPS screens and the ones that do are very expensive, but IPS is the way to go for color accuracy.  I can't imagine going back to TN monitors for my main computer, they look that bad to me.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2012, 07:33:33 AM by eagl »
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2012, 10:57:26 AM »
Nice highjacking guys.  He is not interested in a camera phone. He is asking about a DSLR. As for night shots, get back to me when your iphone can take a picture like this:
(Image removed from quote.)

I'll bet money it will just look like a white light in the sky

Oh it can take a picture like that. Just not from the actual moon :)
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27263
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #17 on: April 23, 2012, 11:49:46 AM »
Nice highjacking guys.  He is not interested in a camera phone. He is asking about a DSLR. As for night shots, get back to me when your iphone can take a picture like this:
(Image removed from quote.)

I'll bet money it will just look like a white light in the sky

Interesting challenge. I'll take a moon shot with my droid next chance I get to see what happens. :)

Can I lasso the moon and pull it closer or is that against the rules. :D
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline saggs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1250
      • www.kirksagers.com
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #18 on: April 23, 2012, 01:26:12 PM »
Kinda same story here.. I've been with Sony ( assimilated Minolta owner ) since the A100 came out.    Just picked up the A77.. and that VF does take a little getting used to.  I haven't done enough with it to formulate an definitive opinion, though I'm a little disappointed in rapid fire mode ( 12 fps ) as the VF can't keep up with the current image.. you just have to wait until the burst mode is over and you'll know what you got when you review it..   Though, to be honest, even with the mirror, it's hard to know what you're really getting too.  Aside from that, though.. the A77 is sweet.

As others have said.. the lenses will make the difference.  I have 2 Zeiss/Sony lenses that are simply awesome.  Well worth the extra $$$. 

Good luck!

 

Yea, I've been with Minolta/Sony since 1990 when I bought a second hand Maxxum 9000 w/ motor drive, since then I've had an Maxxum 800si, 7 and 9 and presently a Alpha 700 and 900.  I still think my Maxxum 9 was the greatest SLR ever built, construction like a tank, perfect ergonomics and controls, excellent meter and speed, to this day I regret selling it when the A700 came along.

My current issue is in addition to not clicking with the EVF, I've got some serious lens envy as well.  My favorite photography is wildlife, and as you know long fast lenses aren't cheap.  But when Sony recently (finally) announced the 500mm f4 "G" which I would love to get, I was shocked to realize that I could buy a Nikkor 500mm f4 + a D800 + a Nikkor 70-200 2.8 for the same as the Sony lens alone.  Even the Sony 300mm f2.8 is like 40% more then the same Nikon.   Problem is I have probably ~$5-6k already invested in Minolta/Sony/CZ glass, and would no doubt take a huge hit financially to switch.

In all honesty I will stick with Sony for at least another year before I do anything rash.  It's possible that Sony is ahead of the curve and in 3-4 years even the new Canikon bodies will be EVF (though likely much better then current ones).  The Sony lens pricing still irritates me though.

Offline saggs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1250
      • www.kirksagers.com
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #19 on: April 23, 2012, 02:10:34 PM »
This is something i've kind of wanted to get into since I was 14, how would I as a 16 year old be recommended to start into this?

Shuffler offered sound advice take it.

I would add this;  Remember that there is basically 2 sides to photography, the technology/gear side and the artistic side.  To be a good photographer you need to do well at both.  For example you could have the greatest gear in the world, and a great artistic eye, but if you don't know how to get the most out of that gear you will never reach it's potential.  The flip side is having great gear and knowing how to use it, but having no artistic talent at all. 

What I see a lot of is people with great gear, who don't know how to use it, and have not artistic talent.  Like the mom I saw at a soccer game I was photographing for a team last fall.  She had a Canon 7D, with a 70-200mm f2.8 "L" lens. (arguably better gear then the A700 and Minolta 80-200mm f2.8 I was using) After I had photographed the game and done team/individual pictures she comes up and asks me "Can you tell me what all these buttons and dials do?" and "How come my pictures are all blurry?"  Apparently her husband bought it for her, because she wanted to photograph her girls sports, and he read on the internet that it was the best.  She had no clue and was just flipping to random settings hoping to find what worked.  To make matters worse her composition was horrible too.   I took her camera and set it to aperture priority at f4, auto ISO, continuous AF and just told here to leave it there.

In general most photographers are not limited by their equipment but by their own talent.  That's why like Shuffler said, start with a simple, cheapish camera (you can pick up second hand film SLRs for well under $100, or even 1st get digital SlRs for not much more, lenses too).  When your skills reach the point where your equipment is holding you back, you will know it, and by then you will be knowledgeable enough to know what kind of equipment you need for the kind of work you do.

For the technology side of photography the best online resource I've found is this website http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/  go there and start with reading all of their "photo essentials" tutorials.  It will help you understand what all the knobs and buttons do, and how they effect the photograph.

For the gear side, find a forum that is specific to the brand you choose.

For the Artistic side, it's mostly just a whole lot of trial and error, you can also browse online photo sharing sites like flickr, smugmug, photosig, dpreview etc.. to get ideas.  I find looking at the work of others that I like, gets my own creative juices flowing.  There are some basics like leading lines and rule of thirds, framing and so forth, but you can't learn it from a book I feel.  Some people have a natural knack for composition, posing etc., others don't.  But even if you don't, you can still develop it I believe, you just have to work harder.

As a side note, for wildlife photography like I do, there is another important aspect as well, and that is biology.  You can't photograph wildlife if you don't know where and when to find it.  Oh and patience, lots and lots of patience.

I've let my own website languish without updates for the past 2 years (been to busy with school and work) but if you want to see a small sampling of my work you can check it out here  www.kirksagers.com  hopefully sometime this year I will revamp my website and add a LOT more content.

Offline saggs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1250
      • www.kirksagers.com
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #20 on: April 23, 2012, 02:19:57 PM »
Interesting challenge. I'll take a moon shot with my droid next chance I get to see what happens. :)

Can I lasso the moon and pull it closer or is that against the rules. :D

Interesting.  Since camera phones don't have a spot meter (that I know of) I'm with Silver.  I think it would fool the meter and you'd just get an big overexposed blob against a dark background.  Unless you "digital zoom"  (AKA crop in camera) close enough to fill most of the frame with moon, in which case you'd lose most of the resolution.

FWIW I took this shot


without metering at all, I just followed the "sunny f16" rule, since the moon is light by sunlight it works.   Shot with a 400mm f5.6, at f16, ISO 200 and 1/200s I believe.  (I may have also tweaked the exposure some in Lightroom I don't recall)
« Last Edit: April 23, 2012, 02:39:13 PM by saggs »

Offline Jack16

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2012, 02:39:38 PM »
 
Nice highjacking guys.  He is not interested in a camera phone. He is asking about a DSLR. As for night shots, get back to me when your iphone can take a picture like this:
(Image removed from quote.)

I'll bet money it will just look like a white light in the sky

Cannon Digital Rebel XSI
He's right. ;)




Offline 1701E

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1894
      • VBF-18 Bearcats
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2012, 04:19:10 PM »
Thanks for all the help guys! :D

More than likely I'll stick with Canon simply because I'm a sucker for using the same brands a lot (least when they work well). Likely price range will be ~800-1100 (In place of the Summer out-of-state Tuition) for a Body and single lens, preferably a Lens fit best for airshows if that isn't more than the price in of itself.

The best I can get with the 80-210mm I am really fine with, but any better would be more than welcome:



Being that I really have only ever used the T50 with its fairly simple and straight forward usage most Camera settings are foreign to me. That's another part of the reason for upgrading, to learn some more with other settings.
I'll definitely get back to your PM about Canon, PFactor. :)
I'd love to be able to afford a few lenses for a few uses, but I'm hardly rolling in money...or even coins for that matter.

And you people are making me jealous, the pictures Silver, Factor and Jack have posted are amazing. One day I'll get close to that. :)

Also, I saw that Canon has an FD Lens to EF Body adapter, would that in any way work? I know the T50 uses the FD mount and read the new Canon standard is EF, would it be worth the $40 test or just not even worth it?

Thanks again!
<S>
 X
ID: Xcelsior
R.I.P. Fallen Friends & Family

"The only ones who should kill are those prepared to be killed"

Offline SilverZ06

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2012, 04:35:09 PM »
If you go to certain events like airshows only once or twice a year, you can always rent a lens. I've used www.lensrentals.com several times and have never had a problem. It great for when you want to try a lens before you buy or if you only need a particular lens once.  :aok

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #24 on: April 23, 2012, 04:49:11 PM »
such a shame the camera companies completely forgot the whole concept of 35mm rangefinders - pocketable, light, sturdy, decent fast prime lens with easy access to focus/aperture/shutter controls. that is what you need to learn how to make good images and its taken them ?15yrs to produce digital versions which are almost as good. and you have to pay at least £1000 for them. :rolleyes:
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline SilverZ06

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2012, 10:17:42 PM »
nice night for moon shots, let's see those phone camera photos.

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2012, 10:58:58 PM »

Also, I saw that Canon has an FD Lens to EF Body adapter, would that in any way work? I know the T50 uses the FD mount and read the new Canon standard is EF, would it be worth the $40 test or just not even worth it?



If you can afford to get started with some modern equipment, then that's what I would suggest.  Adapters like the one you mentioned are still extremelt outdated.  If you can afford to make the jump to digital, you should.  The benefits are great, and getting greater every year.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline APDrone

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3385
Re: Photographers, suggestions requested.
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2012, 07:55:51 AM »
 I'm just not super thrilled with the new line of Sony bodies with electronic viewfinders, they work and have their advantages, but I still prefer a full frame 100% optical VF.


Saggs,
To follow up on some lessons learned with the A77..  Sad to say, but that viewfinder doesn't work for sports shooting where you need the burst rate.  Between the lag in the image appearing in the viewfinder ( I may need to see if there's a setting that keeps that active all the time ) and the lack of memory write speeds, it's just not going to work, reliably, for what I've been doing for the last few years.  Whoops.  If SONY releases all their new high end bodies with that infernal SD memory and this EV, I'll have to bite the bullet and go Canon or Nikon, also.. sigh.  Gotta tell the kid she can only attend a 3 year college..

Aside from that, tho.. if you don't need the bursting for more than a second every 30 seconds, or so.. the A77 does some really cool stuff.
It's great for examining the effectiveness of your lawn-mower blade..



I think I need to get mine sharpened...


AKDrone

Scenario "Battle of Britain" 602nd Squadron