A few days ago I was in a short dispute on country channel. I made a remark that I was chasing down a flight of B-29s at 26k in my 262, to which someone replied I should have taken a Ta 152 for it's better high altitude performance.
When I said that in this case I would never have caught the B-29s, I was drawing huge criticism by players bringing the "I have shot down (a lot) of 29's in the Ta 152", implying that I'm doing something wrong.
I think an explanation of this sortie and the choices behind the plane selection can highlight how much broad statements and "common knowledge" can fail to apply to special situations.
Tactical situation: A friendly base showed a single, rather fast moving con on dar, apparently heading for the town. By jumping into a 88 mount (to utilize the increased icon range) I found out that the con was a formation of B-29's, moving at an altitude of 26-27k (3x read icon range= distance in feet, adjust for horizontal displacement of the con). A juicy, but very diffcult target, particularly as it really turned out to be a town buster - unlike strat raiders they have a quite unpredictable route, which can easily changed in response to interception attempts.
27K is indeed Ta territory, which has much better handling over the Me 262 at that altitude. On top of that, the Ta 152H has a significantly higher rate of climb

So why would someone chose the Me 262?
Because of the climb speed - the (mostly) horizontal speed of the airplane while climbing!
The B-29 travels terribly fast at altitude. While a fighter climbs up, it can cover huge distances. Thus a fighter chasing a B-29 can find himself dozens of miles behind his prey, making a successful interception very difficult or even impossible. A Ta 152H has a default climb speed of 169mph, the Me 262 about 300mph. This results in the following climb profiles:

(Data points in the chart are plane positions by every minute)
While the Ta takes only about 10 minutes to get to the B-20's flight level and the Me 262 5 minutes longer (50%), it would end up one sector behind the B-29s, doing ~260mph. It would have to accelerate for a long time before it would actually start to close in on the B-20 (which was making more than 360 mph at that time). And the distance of one sector would mean the Ta would not be able to detect changes in the Superfortress course quick enough, unless the change was made inside a friendly working radar circle.
The Me 262 would take 15 minutes, but would arrive at almost 430mph (already faster than the 29) and having been within dot range most of the time.
And was is the sole advantage of the 262 which made it a better 29 hunter in this or, similar situations: The ability to keep the Superfortress in visual range while climbing.
If you are able to take off in advance, ahead of the B-29, or if you just happen to be at high altitude when running across a B-29, a Ta (or other planes like the P-47s) might be a much better choice. But this wasn't possible in this case, as the bombers route was unclear and the 'cruise' speed was very high.
The actual sortie came out as a draw: I was able to catch the B-29 formation and shoot down one bomber, before the buff pilot did the right thing and pulled up. At that altitude I couldn't follow his climb for long (particularly as I somewhat botched the recovery after my first attack).
Lusche 1, enemy 0 with 2 surviving planes.