« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lancaster Update  (Read 1145 times)

Offline 1sum41

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 835
      • devil dog squadron
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2012, 03:49:43 PM »
anyone??? :x :x :cheers: :cheers:
Logged

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #16 on: August 15, 2012, 07:53:05 PM »
+1  :aok
Logged
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline AirLynx

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 142
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2012, 08:02:22 PM »
Why not?
+1
Logged

Offline aceshot

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #18 on: August 24, 2012, 11:57:01 AM »
+1  :rock
Logged

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2012, 11:59:52 AM »
B-26 bi plane...?  :huh
Logged
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2012, 04:43:14 PM »
Quote from: Plawranc on August 14, 2012, 08:53:26 PM
Shameless Bump.

(Image removed from quote.)

the Lanc had a control column and a yoke? I thought you had to fly it just using the Force ;)
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline ALFAMEGA51

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1305
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2012, 08:09:59 PM »
I say +1  :aok
Logged
ID:ALFAMEGA/Kyle
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)
Undercover Jug pilot "My brick always flys wing"

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2012, 10:27:12 PM »
+1 I am guessing...just guessing, but considering it is a mainstay of the LWA, It might not be here yet because it may be difficult to get the specific data needed to model that aircraft accurately?  Perhaps it's also to, when updated give it the best update ever, and anything else would fall short of expectations?
Logged

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2012, 01:33:29 PM »
I'd rather see the Wellington and put off an update to the Lance for a time when the "gaps" are filled.  It isnt like the Lanc needs an update to affect performance or other such flight characteristics.  Eye candy is all we'd be getting, really.

Add the Wellington first, imo.   :aok
Logged
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Lancaster Update
« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2012, 01:36:17 PM »
Quote from: SmokinLoon on August 29, 2012, 01:33:29 PM
It isnt like the Lanc needs an update to affect performance or other such flight characteristics.

whoa wait a minute!

the Lanc needs the 5mins WEP it had IRL.
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »