change in the ENY

[surfinn]

Instead of having ENY as a side balance. I suggest that the winning country of any given map has to fly all midwar ac for the next map and if they win twice in a row early, war ac for the next. In the event they win three maps in a row, they get their Late war ac back for the following map with free perk rides for that map. After that the cycle repeats. I also suggest we keep the ENY as a perk point multiplier as it is now.

Just an Idea so flame on haters (coombzy I mean you since I know your opinion already)

[Noir]

Redbull, we need a facepalm picture over here

[VonMessa]

Redbull, we need a facepalm picture over here

 

I'm on it.

[surfinn]

Care to say why you think this is a bad idea instead of being a negative Nancy about it?

[Noir]

Care to say why you think this is a bad idea instead of being a negative Nancy about it?

It's so obvious there is no need to explain why.

[VonMessa]

Care to say why you think this is a bad idea instead of being a negative Nancy about it?

Self-explanatory

Instead of having ENY as a side balance. I suggest that the winning country of any given map has to fly all midwar ac for the next map and if they win twice in a row early, war ac for the next. In the event they win three maps in a row, they get their Late war ac back for the following map with free perk rides for that map. After that the cycle repeats. I also suggest we keep the ENY as a perk point multiplier as it is now.

Just an Idea so flame on haters (coombzy I mean you since I know your opinion already)

You are making the assumption that all players stay married to one chess piece

You are making the assumption that all players stay married to one chess piece

You are making the assumption that all players stay married to one chess piece

You are making the assumption that all players stay married to one chess piece

You are making the assumption that all players stay married to one chess piece

[surfinn]

LOL No I'm not making that assumption. I was a bish at one time and some of the best missions we flew were the Ju87 missions with early war ac as fighter escort. I do think this idea is a game changer and a beneficial one at that. Any large squad can horde with 51ds and 38ls with other fighters mixed in. Imagine the level of difficulty increasing though if ya up late war ac against mid war ac. I know that a lot of squads would welcome the challenge. If they won again imagine the motivation they would have to win with early war AC to get free perk rides on the next map. I mean wow what a side balancer this idea would be   OH and von color your kolaid negitve Nancy trools any way you want to, I still like the idea

[Wildcat1]

I think most of the population would get so buthurt over not being able to fly P-51s and Tempests that they would just leave

[waystin2]

[VonMessa]

LOL No I'm not making that assumption. I was a bish at one time and some of the best missions we flew were the Ju87 missions with early war ac as fighter escort. I do think this idea is a game changer and a beneficial one at that. Any large squad can horde with 51ds and 38ls with other fighters mixed in. Imagine the level of difficulty increasing though if ya up late war ac against mid war ac. I know that a lot of squads would welcome the challenge. If they won again imagine the motivation they would have to win with early war AC to get free perk rides on the next map. I mean wow what a side balancer this idea would be  OH and von color your kolaid negitve Nancy trools any way you want to, I still like the idea

Just because you like an idea does not mean that it is a good one, nor does it mean that I am being negative because I do not like it.

You extol all the benefits of a change like this but you do not address any of the negatives of it.  A good salesman would do both.  Your pitch lacks realism.  Are we all supposed to believe that your idea is so awesome in nature that there are not any drawbacks associated with it?  A good salesman knows the strengths and weaknesses of his product.

What you idea tells me is that I can, at any given time, log on to a map where my plane set is limited due to the actions or tactics of others that have been playing  throughout the day, before I get home from work and have a chance to play.  In essence, the type of aircraft available to me at any given time is possibly hamstrung dependent upon how others have chosen to play while I was not logged on and through none of my own actions.  In addition, if I have already switched sides within the past 12 hours, I am stuck with one particular chess-piece.  Basically I have to "ride it out" until my 12 hours is up or the map is won, etc.

In what way does this benefit game-play?  Once again, it would only be a tool used to dictate the playing style of paying subscribers.

[guncrasher]

I think most of the population would get so buthurt over not being able to fly P-51s and Tempests that they would just leave

well this isn't apple where they tell you what you need.



semp

[RedBull1]

Redbull, we need a facepalm picture over here

[surfinn]

Well apparently you have had the time to post all day  I haven't seen anything you have said as a detractor from the Idea if you are married to your 51d and are a ace flier then the 12 hour rule doesn't apply to you as you will change countries for the duration of the map thus balancing the sides( much like fester or tosh does already).  Heck I see this idea as a great improvement to the game just cause Von thinks it wouldn't be;)

[VonMessa]

Well apparently you have had the time to post all day  I haven't seen anything you have said as a detractor from the Idea if you are married to your 51d and are a ace flier then the 12 hour rule doesn't apply to you as you will change countries for the duration of the map thus balancing the sides( much like fester or tosh does already).  Heck I see this idea as a great improvement to the game just cause Von thinks it wouldn't be;)

Fantastic fallacy gumbo!  Red Herring mixed with a bit of straw-man and a dash of personal attack.        

Are you willing to argue your point, or just point fingers and be facetious?

I have flown a P51 less than 10 times in the past 5 years.  I have never claimed to be an ace flier.  What do Fester or Tosh have to do with your idea?

Sell your idea.  Have you ever purchased a specific product at a specific price because "The salesman said it was a good idea" ?

I have listed my reason and I can do it again, just to reiterate:

This idea limits the type of aircraft available to me at any given time dependent upon how others have chosen to play while I was not logged on and through none of my own actions.   It punishes all, for the hording and/or base grabbing antics of other players.  If some squad wins the map while I am sleeping, how will it benefit game play for the folks that were sleeping to have a hamstrung plane-set when they wake-up while the players that precipitated the truncated plane-set are now asleep (just one of many scenarios)?

[surfinn]

wow no personal attacks there von.

How will it improve game play you ask?  it will give people the opportunity to fly ac they have never flown before

They will get free perk rides, also giving them opportunity's they have never had before and thus promoting the game to new players.

It will balance sides out better than the current eny system does.