Are stupid people equal?
well see the way i see it, the typical guy when he's losing an argument will resort to personal insults . so I guess you are really going for the government having another million employees to teach people how to properly shoot. is that really a good idea?so please enlighten me on how the government can or should teach people to handle firearms without spending what little money there's left of my social security. I figure if you gonna insult me at least let me know the details of your idea, who knows maybe one of my dead brain cells can come back to life. unless of course your idea is too complex for this guy to understand, hey but who knows perhaps I can ask fugitive to draw some cartoons to make it easier on me .semp
I'm pretty sure I mentioned this topic beforehand......"They would be afraid blah blah" - It's got nothing to do with them being afraid. It's got to do with being able to have enough man power and supplies. They had their hands full just |)1[king around in SEA.
Sometimes we believe what gives us comfort & supports our hypothesis regardless of "Facts" supported by others...
Wow!I think you may have just summed up gun control laws as a whole!
Semp, losing an argument with you would be slightly less likely than losing an argument with a tree...Many states, counties and municipalities already offer a firearms safety course for free. Many offer online courses. Some states require passing an approved safety course to obtain a concealed carry permit. A Federal program could easily utilize the existing resources of the CMP and affiliated clubs. The issue is that there is no training standardization, which usually reduces overall cost. The initial cost and annual cost of such a program would be a minuscule fraction of the money we hand to our trustworthy friends, the Pakistani government.
there you go again with the personal insults. your idea will need the creation of a new bureaucracy and we already have too much of that. the initial cost is not small potatoes, there would be hundreds of thousands of new employees handling all the paperwork. unless of course you can dream that a couple of employees sitting on a desk somewhere can handle all the paperwork for the millions of people that would apply to participate on the free gun training class. then of course somebody has to pay the instructors as they arent going to work for free.if you want to own a gun then you need to be responsible for it and that includes getting your own safety training. there's a lot of good programs out there and they arent that expensive until you include the government then all of a sudden the training class cost will increase considerably. semp
there ya go: rights are demonstrably not absolute, universal and inviolable. they change depending on what a particular society at a particular time has decided they should be. there is nothing natural about them, they are artificial and created by man, not handed to us prepackaged by nature/god/reality/whatever.
Don't listen to RT he is talking gibberish, its a technique used by the middleclasses to appear to be supierior to the working classes - the term is called "Elaborated Speech"The lower orders use "Restricted speech"Everyone in 1920's Germany was armed
Listen, if the truth is painful, say "ouch".Above is the typical Semp logic at work... "Hundreds of thousands of new employees"...blah, blah, blah.....Seriously Semp, you generate more BS than Pamplona in July.....
Did you see my dad on dogfights yet?
I'll be seeing you face to face possibly next month.
