Author Topic: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E  (Read 2233 times)

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« on: August 26, 2012, 09:45:46 PM »
Did these two ever match up in strength in North Africa? I know No. 112 squadron started operation the P-40 in June of 1941, was the Emil still the main Luftwaffe fighter at that time? What other RAF units had the P-40 in mid-1941?

Thanks  :salute
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9162
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2012, 11:12:00 PM »
The 109f was not introduced to the african theater until September 1941.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7272
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2012, 08:36:28 AM »
It's the 109E that's being discussed.

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2012, 09:36:04 AM »
It's the 109E that's being discussed.

Yep, and the F wasnt introduced until Sept 1941.

A cursory google  turned up a book and  a note in the wikipedia page The P-40 usually had an edge over the Bf 109 in horizontal maneuverability, .....

HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2012, 12:18:04 PM »
109Es that may have engaged in early Hawks were most likely E-7 or later F. The E served on until almost the end of 1942, but more as a second-tier jabo platform, delivering fast small bombloads. It wasn't being used as a fighter very much at that time.

I believe our E-4 has the edge against the P-40C. I think it can turn better, it's got better climb and vertical (my opinion, just from feel), and can regain lost E way better. Once the cannon ammo runs out the odds even out significantly, but still, there ya have it.

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2012, 06:32:34 PM »
I'm just trying to think of some major air battles early on in the Western Desert Campaign where these two would have faced off
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2012, 06:54:50 PM »
I'm just trying to think of some major air battles early on in the Western Desert Campaign where these two would have faced off

They could have faced off during the Tunisia Campaign and I'm sure they would have fought during the Western Desert Campaign as well.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2012, 08:01:25 PM »
As long as the speeds stay above 250 TAS and at at 12k-15k me thinks it would be more of a pilot vs pilot fight than a P40C vs 109E-4 match duel.  The only real card the P40 can play is a better dive speed and control ability at those high speeds.  Otherwise, the 109E-4 seems to me would have a better climb, a better acceleration, and a better snap shot ability (the quad .30's and dual .50's need to land multiple hits while the 109E-4 can land only 1-2 20mm and get results).  Otherwise I think turn and roll is not all that different with maybe a slight edge to the P40 in the roll (Just a theory, I have not tested it yet).

As far as how they were flown in WWII in North Africa, I'd be willing to be the rules of engagement favored and tactics favored the Allies in the P40C vs 109E-4 match-ups.  It isn't quite so black and white and crystal clear to which plane is/was superior in the real deal as it is in AH.  Keep that in mind with all things in AH.   :aok
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2012, 08:52:13 PM »
P-40s were slaughtered in Africa by 109s, and even 110s. In one engagement German ace Hans-Joachim Marseille attacked a formation of 16 P-40s all by himself and shot down six of them including three aces: Robin Pare, Douglas Golding and Andre Botha.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2012, 08:55:48 PM by GScholz »
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2012, 09:00:11 PM »
Tomahawks were used for low level escort and low level attack. Aside from the Bf 109, they also encountered many Italian CR-42s and G-50s. Both were slow, badly armed opponents and rather easy to defeat or avoid. Didn't Clive Caldwell (RAAF) earn more than 20 kills in a Tomahawk IIB? Several 109s in that total too.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2012, 09:16:57 PM »
In my research I've found that many 109 pilots thought the P-40 was in many ways equal. It wasn't "slaughtered" by the Luftwaffe in North Africa, IIRC.
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2012, 09:22:17 PM »
P-40s were slaughtered in Africa by 109s, and even 110s. In one engagement German ace Hans-Joachim Marseille attacked a formation of 16 P-40s all by himself and shot down six of them including three aces: Robin Pare, Douglas Golding and Andre Botha.

Marseille had only 12 or so kills in North Africa flying the 109E, or something near to that. Indeed, he lost several 109Es in combat. One Free French Hurricane pilot (Denis, was his name, I think) shot down Marseille twice!

It wasn't until early 1942, now flying a 109F, that Marseille really began to roll up the victories quickly. But, he was flying the best fighter in the theater at the time, and he worked very hard to develop his marksmanship and tactics. By then, the Kittyhawk I was arriving in theater. Probably the best pilot in North Africa, but he also had the best fighter to take full advantage of his remarkable skill.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2012, 11:36:22 PM »
Tomahawks were used for low level escort and low level attack. Aside from the Bf 109, they also encountered many Italian CR-42s and G-50s. Both were slow, badly armed opponents and rather easy to defeat or avoid. Didn't Clive Caldwell (RAAF) earn more than 20 kills in a Tomahawk IIB? Several 109s in that total too.

Caldwell was a stud.   :aok  The RAAF's best ace of WWII.  He had quite the colorful history.    :salute
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2012, 08:03:47 AM »
James "Stocky" Edwards, flew P-40s in North Africa. He got several kills with the P-40 before switching to Spitfires. Here are his views on the P-40:

"... not an easy aircraft to fly properly and as a result, we lost a good number of pilots while training. In the first few months after conversion to Kittyhawks, all the squadrons lost heavily to the 109s.

I found that one had to have a very strong right arm to fly the Kittyhawk I during most maneuvers. In dive-bombing, the aircraft would pick up speed very quickly in the dive, but it had a great tendency to roll to the right. One could trim this out reasonably well with the left hand, but even then when one pulled up, it wanted to roll to the left quite viloently. So I learned to trim about halfway in the dive and hold the control stick central by bracing my right elbow against my right leg and the right wall of the cockpit. It was also distracting to have one's left hand on the trim all the time, when it should be on the throttle. In a dogfight, with violent changes of speed, it was all one could do to fly the aircraft.

Kittyhawk II... was a definite improvement in lateral stability over the Kitty I. Eventually, with the Mk IIIs, the Kittyhawk became a good, stable fighting aircraft, although it never did have enough power or climbing ability compared to the 109s or the Spitfire."
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline trap78

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 712
Re: P-40C (or B) vs. 109E
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2012, 07:55:58 PM »

Quote
Did these two ever match up in strength in North Africa?
Many times mostly in section strength

Quote
was the Emil still the main Luftwaffe fighter at that time?
It was and units of both JG-26 and 27 were flying them

Quote
What other RAF units had the P-40 in mid-1941?
250 Squadron RAF and 2 Squadron SAAF

The following actions took place towards the end of Operation Battleaxe.  Rommel had advanced to Sallum, Egypt but his offensive was stalled because of supply issues. Tobruk was surrounded but still in Allied hands.

*16 June 1941
At 1500, eight Tomahawks of 250 squadron fought their first battle over the desert meeting five 109s over Bardia. Squadron leader Scoulnar and Flight Lieutenant Martin each damaged a 109 and Pilot Officer Edghill shot one down. The Germans initially identified the Tomahawks as Brewster’s.

*18 June 1941
The Tomahawks of 250 squadron suffered their first loses while strafing the Capuzzo-Tobruk-El Adem road. One aircraft was brought down by flak but the pilot bailed successfully and joined a friendly party of Arabs. Fifteen days later he arrived back at Sidi Barrani. While returning to base the other seven Tomahawks were bounced by four 109s. Three Tomahawks were shot down; all the pilots bailed out. However one, Sergeant Munro, was dead upon landing.

*Source – Fighters Over the Desert