hahahahaha

[ink]

http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20120322010-obama-protest-bill.html

not gonna say anything just laugh

[tmetal]

Wow. just....wow.   

[ink]

Wow. just....wow.   

yup that was about the same response I had

[zack1234]

Why would this benefit anyone.

In the UK you can protest seven days a week, no one listens to you anyway

What positive reason is there for such a law.?

So if a federal agent is not present its fine to protest, if a agent is present is it not entrapment?

I am going to have a dirty protest to gain solidarity with the colonials

Are federal agents monitoring this site?

[ink]

Why would this benefit anyone.

In the UK you can protest seven days a week, no one listens to you anyway
 same here haha(well in the past anyways
What positive reason is there for such a law.?

there is none except controlling the people

So if a federal agent is not present its fine to protest, if a agent is present is it not entrapment?

I am going to have a dirty protest to gain solidarity with the colonials

Are federal agents monitoring this site?

probably

[Rob52240]

I don't find it funny.

[ink]

I don't find it funny.

(Image removed from quote.)

I know there is no sarcastic fonts...... I was being extremely sarcastic....its not funny at all.......although I need to laugh at it....

[Klam]

The right of peaceful protest is being slowly snuffed out in many capitalist democracies. 
Freedom of speech is a now heading towards privilege and not a right.
lots of examples, whether you agree with the protest/er or not is not important.

"our society is run by insane people for insane objectives,
I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and
I think I am liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.
That's what's insane about it."

                                          John Lennon.

[zack1234]

What should I do Klam the CIA are going to probe me.........Again

[guncrasher]

well considering that it came from a political website, can somebody post a link to what the law actually says?

found it here

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text


‘Sec. 1752. Restricted building or grounds

        ‘(a) Whoever--

            ‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;

            ‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;

            ‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; or

            ‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds;


so the bit about "where the secret service is" is kind of like almost lying

semp

edit: and it passed the house by 388 to 3.  that was 244 republicans and 164 democrats.  I dont think the senate was really any different.

[NaTorino]

CobraJet

[Estes]

(Image removed from quote.)




CobraJet

  I bet that one gets this shut down. That was awesome though! 

[RedBull1]

[Ack-Ack]

You should also point direct your "ire" at the Republicans because one of the guys that created this bill is a Republican and the bill had the support of both parties as it made its way through Congress.

The majority of "Yeah" votes were Republican.  223 Republicans voted in favor of the bill compared to 176 Democrats with only 3 Republicans voting No.


ack-ack

[gyrene81]

lol, can't believe the guys who took the bait on that one...so much misinformation...there is always "the rest of the story".