Author Topic: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish  (Read 8659 times)

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #105 on: October 16, 2012, 01:39:05 PM »
Oh dear so you were being serious about this hacking business?  :( I am afraid that is a violation of the rules   :uhoh

"7- Cheating allegations or descriptions are not allowed. Email support@hitechcreations.com to report any issues regarding this. HTC permanently bans anyone caught cheating in Aces High. We take cheating and allegations of cheating very seriously. "

You even violated that rule in the above post  :o

Really? nah Im not going to bother looking because that clearly IS stinky bait.  Ill just take my win.
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #106 on: October 16, 2012, 01:42:38 PM »
Conclusion:  Nathan tosses bait out in the water by saying bruv cheats.  No one bites.  Pervert then tosses a counter troll which landed a big one :) . Nathan claim your defeat and move on.
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #107 on: October 16, 2012, 01:44:25 PM »
Conclusion:  Nathan tosses bait out in the water by saying bruv cheats.  No one bites.  Pervert then tosses a counter troll which landed a big one :) . Nathan claim your defeat and move on.
Please,  its clear  what went down here and I cintinue to bring the trot lline in. Yet another one that dont now how to contextualise.
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #108 on: October 16, 2012, 01:52:34 PM »
:). Learn to accept defeat. 
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #109 on: October 16, 2012, 01:55:33 PM »
Oh come on, if you dont want to, the brewster wont kill you, that thing is as slow.
AoM
City of ice

Offline coombz

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3701
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #110 on: October 16, 2012, 02:28:16 PM »
'pervert is a hacker'

the favoured claim of terrible pilots who get out turned by 190d9 :)

the 'notorious hack squad, The Few' strikes again
Did you see my dad on dogfights yet?
I'll be seeing you face to face possibly next month.

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #111 on: October 16, 2012, 04:11:48 PM »
See Rule #4

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #112 on: October 28, 2012, 12:04:36 PM »
WoW :D  It's like what, first time in 2 years since I've posted here.. and I see some interesting stuff.

First would be the fact I see friendly faces like Karnak or Wmaker still here (Hullo, gents!  :banana: )

Second would be the influx of typical MA dweebs in claiming the dreaded "anecdotes" of planes defying the global physics -- except back in the day, these fools would have been made a laughing stock the moment they start spewing the typical, time-old whines against certain planes they hate, according to their "feel" and "opinion" which so conveniently overpowers "burden of proof".

What has these forums turned to while I was gone? :D



(ps) Ain't no whiner like a luftwhiner, and I if a luftwhiner like me finds these whines lame.... hehehehehe  :x
« Last Edit: October 28, 2012, 12:07:52 PM by Kweassa »

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #113 on: October 28, 2012, 12:30:41 PM »
LOL pervert

JG 52

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #114 on: October 28, 2012, 01:53:21 PM »
Heya, Kweassa. Long time, no see. How've you been doing?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #115 on: October 28, 2012, 02:00:02 PM »
Hi, Karnak.

I am seriously considering whether I should open a subscription and return to the skies of the MA... or not.
Although I admit, I am a little disappointed at the apparent stagnation of the status of AH.

To tell you the truth, the recent open beta of "War Thunder", rekindled my old love for WW2 aircombat simulation genre... the game itself is casual and arcade at best, but it does look beautiful... and is also a MMO... it did make me miss AH2, and I thought, "if only AH had developed to this level of graphics and simple interface...". Yeah.. I know they are a small, skeleton crew company, and I know how all the boys like 'slow and steady' here... but I'm a bit worried perhaps HTC's lagging behind the curve.

Apparently, plane/vehicles/boats all seem to be the same... as well as MA gameplay style... and ofcourse, the level of aesthetics...

Is there something significantly different with the latest incarnation of AH2 that I might have missed??


(ps) What I worry most, is that many recent developers are trying to do something which AH has been the sole provider for such a long time. The more-or-less success of World of Tanks, and their expansion into a more full-time WW2 environment into the World of Planes... they openly announced that they are adding in the ground and naval war aspect... and from what I've seen, it might be a lot more worthy than what Cornered Rat tried to do a few years back, with their fuddled WW2 Online attempt.

Our obsession for realism is quickly becoming something only we understand... and I fear HTC might not be able to survive as a company that needs profits, with only us to sustain them.


« Last Edit: October 28, 2012, 02:04:20 PM by Kweassa »

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #116 on: October 28, 2012, 02:05:31 PM »
HiTech determined that the strat system wasn't being used because it was too complex and thus simplified it.  There is a lot more strat raids going on since he changed it up.  There are hints of more strat system changes coming in the next version.

Other than that, pretty much the same game.  I don't recall when you left, but mostly the last two years have been about additional units and changes to the GVs.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #117 on: October 30, 2012, 11:02:01 AM »
Hiya Kweassa! :)

You're a welcome sight. :) Rational logic is something this board needs nowadays... ;)
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7282
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #118 on: October 31, 2012, 10:30:13 AM »
I'm seeing a lot more high altitude fights with the recent changes.

This is good.

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: Spit16 vs. Flopping Dead Fish
« Reply #119 on: October 31, 2012, 10:37:19 AM »
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep