Author Topic: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night  (Read 236 times)

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« on: October 26, 2012, 11:57:44 AM »
It was about the Doolittle raid and how the 25 had to be modified....blah blah blah.  Instead of the planes trying to make landfall and land why didn't they just fly back to the carrier group, bail and get picked up by rescue boats?   :confused:
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2012, 12:03:53 PM »
It was about the Doolittle raid and how the 25 had to be modified....blah blah blah.  Instead of the planes trying to make landfall and land why didn't they just fly back to the carrier group, bail and get picked up by rescue boats?   :confused:

And the Alerted Japanese would say "Hey those Bombers flew ---------> that way" and send everything they had after them would of been a very BAD thing, second those B-25s launched those carriers were full steam back to Pearl, they were far to deep in enemy territory to waste valuable time picking up survivors.

JG 52

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2012, 12:08:41 PM »
Exactly.  They were spotted by the Japanese.  The plan was for them to turn home the moment the bombers launched anyways, if I recall correctly.  Had either of those carriers been sunk, the outcome of the war would have dragged on a bit longer.
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2012, 12:13:50 PM »
And the Alerted Japanese would say "Hey those Bombers flew ---------> that way" and send everything they had after them would of been a very BAD thing, second those B-25s launched those carriers were full steam back to Pearl, they were far to deep in enemy territory to waste valuable time picking up survivors.



The CG did not stay in the pacific as an asset? Couldn't the bombers have plotted a long / out of the way rendezvous point and then bee lined it to the CG considering the bombers had extended range?  Just thinking not arguing.  :aok
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline ToeTag

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2012, 12:14:47 PM »
posted at the same time....guess it could not happen.
They call it "common sense", then why is it so uncommon?

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2012, 03:42:01 PM »
And the Alerted Japanese would say "Hey those Bombers flew ---------> that way" and send everything they had after them would of been a very BAD thing, second those B-25s launched those carriers were full steam back to Pearl, they were far to deep in enemy territory to waste valuable time picking up survivors.



To add, it wasn't just the USS Hornet with all its chips being put on the table, the Enterprise (escorting, since the Hornet's deck was crowded with B25s and its fighters trapped below) and a large number of cruisers and destroyers.

Had either of the valuable ships been damaged or disabled by one errant pilot or sub after being spotted as they lingered deep in enemy territory, the rest of the fleet would of had no choice but to of continued a full running retreat and could write off any damaged ship as a total loss if not by their own hands then by the Japanese within 24 hours.  Even one destroyer would equate to a larger loss strategicly and materialy than the bombers and their crews, the later which already ceded to taking on a risky mission with little chance of a quick return home if any at all.
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2012, 04:34:10 PM »
It was about the Doolittle raid and how the 25 had to be modified....blah blah blah.  Instead of the planes trying to make landfall and land why didn't they just fly back to the carrier group, bail and get picked up by rescue boats?   :confused:

Because the carriers were more valuable than 25 B-25s and their crew.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline ArcticKat

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: Was watching "Narrow escapes of WWII" last night
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2012, 05:42:16 PM »
Because the carriers were more valuable than 25 B-25s and their crew.

ack-ack

Besides, we couldn't let the enemy know where Shangri-La was. ;)
"That Fokker's a Messerschmitt!"