Author Topic: Eny changes  (Read 640 times)

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Eny changes
« on: December 08, 2012, 03:12:33 PM »
Tank killer Stuka change eny to 28-30
Why: it is slow, can't take hits like il2, doesn't carry ords, and very limited ammo.
It's gun only kills tank when rounds hit at flat angles and it requires 4hits/two bursts to kill tanks 70-80% of the time. This plane should not have same eny as il2 which is much more versatile and a better tank killer. And I believe that

eny affects how much some rides are taken(at least for me, I'm a perk farmer).

M8 change eny to 50. It has very weak gun ap and he, it can be killed with a machine gun. It should not have same eny as early panzer which has a decent gun and can take hits (most of the time).

Fw190a8: change eny back to 31.  Where she belongs at at least compromise and make it 28.

Other than take I can live with all other eny

Offline MrKrabs

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2152
      • AH-Freebirds.com
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2012, 03:26:52 PM »
M8's ENY is due to its sheer speed. The only reason why a M8 would get killed by machine guns is because of irresponsibility. Just like how a King Tiger would get bombed because it was left out in the open.

M8's are more than capable of knocking out flak panzers and regular panzers by hitting them in the side of the turret.

TBH, the M8 is right where it should be. And if firepower is what you need, there is a nearly as fast M18 to play with
The boiling pot is put away and the crab has gone back to sea...

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2012, 03:37:35 PM »
Kills 2 bombers from a 3 bomber box 3000ft away with one tap of the trigger. Wins HO's with tiffy and survives the head on 20mm and plucks the wings from Doras on the fly like shooting skeet. You just need a better gunsight and full zoom.

Now if Hitech would get rid of the gamey commanders view one shot wonder kill of attaker planes........or allow the commander to die becasue his head is outside the turret and shrapnel from round strikes on the tank in real life would decapatate him. He already allows the guns in the open top wirbel to be destroyed that way but, the player is Superman and resistant to bullets. In real life the crew died.

Hmmmm, then you would need a 3D crew compartment with a driver who lives through that and takes command of the tank after the commander or gun crew gets his\their head(s) blown off. anyone remember in Saving Prvt Ryan when the 20mm opened up on the troopers trying to attach sticky bombs to the panzer tank? The rounds and the sharpnel cut them into baxon bits. The AH GV game reminds me of playing a RoboMech game with single shot main guns. I keep waiting to see a King Tiger stand up and walk off across the battel feild. We pilots die all the time to a golden BB in the cockpit. But. tank commanders are Superman.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2012, 03:45:18 PM »
M8's ENY is due to its sheer speed. The only reason why a M8 would get killed by machine guns is because of irresponsibility. Just like how a King Tiger would get bombed because it was left out in the open.

M8's are more than capable of knocking out flak panzers and regular panzers by hitting them in the side of the turret.

TBH, the M8 is right where it should be. And if firepower is what you need, there is a nearly as fast M18 to play with

Yes she's fast but you still need to be within 200 to kill panzers from the rear and flank and you still need 2 shots to do it. And yes it can turret a flak with one round but will take at least two more to kill it and also it has to be in the flank. I also think that flaks kill m8s with ease.


As for 190a8 she has been 31 for longer than she's been 25... I think 28 is a good compromise

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2012, 03:47:33 PM »
As for 190a8 she has been 31 for longer than she's been 25... I think 28 is a good compromise
The Fw190A-8 is used pretty heavily.  That is likely the reason behind the ENY being lowered to 25.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2012, 11:19:12 PM »
also i think me410 should be 3-5 more eny than me110. handling is crap, and 110 is a better destroyer

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2012, 12:20:07 AM »
The only vessel in Aces High that should have an ENY of 50 is the goon because it has no way of being on the offensive, it is always on the defensive.  Even the lowly jeep has more of a chance of surviving contact with the enemy.

The 190A-8 is a beast, it is one of the best bomber hunters in the game thanks to its quad 20mm or dual 30mm/dual 20mm cannon options.  The thing it is not though is a dog fighter, it has a very small bag of tricks with firepower and roll rate being about its only trump cards, and perhaps dive speed and energy retention.  Otherwise, it certainly can not turn, climb, or accelerate.  Once it gets below 200mph just bail and be done with it.  Use it for what it was designed for and you'll see that the current ENY is not far out of line.   

The M8 has saved more than 1 field from capture.  It offers a lot of speed and a high rate of fire for troop carrier interdiction.  Arm it with a 40/40 mix of AP and HE.  Use the HE on everything other than tanks (yes, even vs FLAKS the HE wil lmore easily damage turret than AP, ditto vs M18's, M3's, etc), and confront tank only on their flanks or rear and get within 600 yards or so.  Best bet is to keep moving and do what an M8 does best: scout and interdict.

Oh, and if you think that these three vessels are the only one in AH that need adjustment may I suggest you take some more time and learn the library a bit better.  There are a whole host of aircraft and gv's that need adjustment.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2012, 12:50:24 AM »
also i think me410 should be 3-5 more eny (..) and 110 is a better destroyer

The 110 is a much better attacker / fighter bomber, but a better destroyer? Absolutely not. The 410 is far superior in anti-buff firepower, being able to kills bombers outside their defensive fire range either by the sniping 50mm gun or the most devastating gun package in game, the twin Mk-103.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2012, 12:52:43 AM »
i'm rather well read read...i am a scholar of history(by degrees) and i spend way too much time in library and archives as it is.  As for other rides you have problems with post something about it. this one is mine :banana:

anyway, if the M8 were 50 or 5 eny it would still be used as a scout(which stork does better anyway, and who the Hill scouts with an M8 lol)/ m3 hunting and would have no bearing on its usage for that role. increasing eny from 40 to 50 is only so you could get a perk or 2 more for killing early panzer that shares eny with M8 and panzer(early) is a much better platform for killing vehicles, shelling towns, and killing guns. ENY is a risk and reward system. take a crappie ride and kill a sweet ride get more perks than using a sweet ride to kill a crappie ride. ipso facto an M8 should get more perks for killing an early panzer than a panzer(early) should get for killing an M8

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2012, 01:08:09 AM »
The 110 is a much better attacker / fighter bomber, but a better destroyer? Absolutely not. The 410 is far superior in anti-buff firepower, being able to kills bombers outside their defensive fire range either by the sniping 50mm gun or the most devastating gun package in game, the twin Mk-103.

sorry i meant offensive/assault/ground attack which "Zerstörer"s where tasked with after not living up to  the doctrine of carrying lots of guns and escort buff on offensive operations and they got swept from skies by escort fighters when the role changed to buff killer (excluding night fighter role which it still did well). The AH 110 is a ground pounder and the 410 is just not as good at it and in addition to that, the 410 has horrible handling compared to 110. So you are you saying just for the occasional buff hunt (and hope theres no fighters within a sector), this plane deserves the same eny as the 110?


Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2012, 01:38:45 AM »
So you are you saying just for the occasional buff hunt (and hope theres no fighters within a sector), this plane deserves the same eny as the 110?

Yes, just for the ability to kill bombers with impunity from their six oclock. Even the dreaded 262 or the 110 have to face the defensive fire at some point. Of course it sucks vs fighters, but then the 110 ain't exactly "worth" it's low ENY in fighter-vs-fighter combat too (same goes for the Lancaster for example).
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2012, 03:20:05 AM »
Yes, just for the ability to kill bombers with impunity from their six oclock. Even the dreaded 262 or the 110 have to face the defensive fire at some point. Of course it sucks vs fighters, but then the 110 ain't exactly "worth" it's low ENY in fighter-vs-fighter combat too (same goes for the Lancaster for example).

it doesnt take much  :joystick: to make 2k+ shot almost impossible.

and im thinking we are talking whole package of what plane brings to the game and how much it can effect the game/war... anyone who can get 2k+kills with that gun(rookies cant dispersion is a big problem at that range) can also figure our how to make solid passes on buff with 'almost' impunity. a "rookie" 110 can take out so much more of a base than a rookie 410 pilot can take out buffs. also i think many good pilots dont fly the 410 is because it doesnt have a good "Risk Reward" ratio. isnt that what eny is for in the first place a risk reward ratio that can tell u ad some point "your side is loosing, so here is a better reward for taking out a crappie ride."

For the lanc...she is a game changing aircraft, it has the best payload for the eny(ju88 also needs a higher eny). At alt, she is not the easiest buff to catch and get into position with; when down low she can change the out come of gv battle (for a while) with 18 500lber bombs and still have a coockie(4000lber) left and still defend its self well(for a buff).


Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2012, 08:15:04 AM »
it doesnt take much  :joystick: to make 2k+ shot almost impossible.


Who's talking about 2k+?
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2012, 09:37:50 PM »
it doesnt take much  :joystick: to make 2k+ shot almost impossible.

and im thinking we are talking whole package of what plane brings to the game and how much it can effect the game/war... anyone who can get 2k+kills with that gun(rookies cant dispersion is a big problem at that range) can also figure our how to make solid passes on buff with 'almost' impunity. a "rookie" 110 can take out so much more of a base than a rookie 410 pilot can take out buffs. also i think many good pilots dont fly the 410 is because it doesnt have a good "Risk Reward" ratio. isnt that what eny is for in the first place a risk reward ratio that can tell u ad some point "your side is loosing, so here is a better reward for taking out a crappie ride."

For the lanc...she is a game changing aircraft, it has the best payload for the eny(ju88 also needs a higher eny). At alt, she is not the easiest buff to catch and get into position with; when down low she can change the out come of gv battle (for a while) with 18 500lber bombs and still have a coockie(4000lber) left and still defend its self well(for a buff).



The Lancaster carries an ordnance load second only to the B29, but in terms of defensive armament it is lacking.  It does have two .50's in the tail, but they are short on ammo.  Otherwise it has dual .30's in a dorsal turret and dual .30's in the nose.  If the attacking fighter pilot has patience enough to get into position *ahead* of the Lancs it makes for an much better chance of survival.  The Lancs are tough as well.  Oh, they dont climb the best when loaded down either.  If escorted properly, the Lancs and their 14/1000 bombs are devastating. 

You mention the Ju88's.  They currently have a better OBJ score than the B17's, what for no one seems to know.  The Ju88's really only have 4400 lbs of useful ordnance, and if you want to speak of a weak defensive armament in the medium/heavy bomber department the Ju88's are it.  Nothing to the front and very limited to the flanks.  Only to the dead six does it have a chance of defending itself.  Climb, speed, and range are all poor for medium/heavy bombers.   
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Eny changes
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2012, 11:44:04 AM »
I have killed buffs from 2k+ with 410 And even got a vulch kills on a set from 4k+ but that was lucky lol. I only would like to see the 410 a couple of eny more than 110 in hope that it increases usage a little. I always take rides with little higher eny for perks. I posted this in hopes to get eny changed for really the M8, and Stuka(tank killer) so they might be seen more often in MA. And also the 410.  
I would like to see 190a8 get a little higher eny too. I don't fly it as much as I used to once they changed eny, I switched to mossie instead because its a 30 and gives me more perks per flight.


And maybe if ju88 were higher eny or obj we would see them more. And that's again why I posted this. I think incentive to take certain rides out is not enough to sway player to use them. Of course there are the players that don't care about perks, but I think since we have more and more perk rides new player will want to earn perks with rides that can give them that quicker. Especially in the GV department. Right now we are seeing mostly early panzers and t34/85s because killing any tank in a early panzer (which is very possible even with 1shot) earns you enough perks to take out a t85. We see almost no M8s because it is very hard to kill anything and the risk reward is not high enough to use them compared to the early panzer.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2012, 11:55:41 AM by bangsbox »