Author Topic: More ordnance updates....  (Read 1731 times)

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2012, 08:36:30 PM »
I didn't misunderstand anything.  You were wrong and you're just trying to save face and backpedal by claiming you meant "SOME allied fighter..." instead of what you originally claimed in your post.  Remember the only result of backpedaling is that you'll eventually end up on your ass.


ack-ack



Who poured lemonade in your cereal today?  :huh

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2012, 09:10:47 PM »
If we get more ordinance options:

Tiny Tims!
Centerline rack for the F4U-41D/C and 4 with the 2000lber as an option.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2012, 11:42:25 PM »
Since this is a ordinance related thread I'd like to ask here:

Whats the difference between the High Capacity and Light Case bombs :huh? They both seem to have the same effect in game. Are the HCs heavier performance wise? LCs aren't going to blow up if hit by enemy fire are they? :lol


They are same thing... Htc is just using both acronyms.

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7295
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2012, 02:39:52 PM »
How about incindenary ordinance?
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2012, 03:48:47 PM »
How about incendiary ordinance?

Would need to add fire damage to the game first before we get incendiary bombs.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2012, 03:54:33 PM »
I'd like to see some of this extended to ammunition: See actual differences between ball, AP, API, grenade, HE, etc.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #21 on: December 14, 2012, 07:13:48 PM »
I didn't misunderstand anything.  You were wrong and you're just trying to save face and backpedal by claiming you meant "SOME allied fighter..." instead of what you originally claimed in your post.  Remember the only result of backpedaling is that you'll eventually end up on your ass.

Jeez AKAK, you on the rag or something? Tell me you've never misremembered anything and I'll say BS.

Now, one more time, do you know of any WWII Allied fighter capable of carrying 4x 1000lb bombs? Or maybe something like 4x 500lb bombs on double shackles, or inner and outer hardpoints?



EDIT: After taking another look at the P-38, it looks like I was remembering the P-38's 4x or 6x 250lb or 500lb bombs.



« Last Edit: December 14, 2012, 07:20:34 PM by Tank-Ace »
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7311
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2012, 07:20:37 AM »
Better not dally around and wait too long in the pull out or your props will strike the bombs.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2012, 08:31:32 AM »
I would like a P-38 that could carry six 500lb bombs in AH.  If it could do six 500lb bombs and ten 5" rockets all the better.  More P-38s being used as strike aircraft probably means fewer P-51Ds being used as strike aircraft and anything that reduces the numbers of P-51Ds is good.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tinkles

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2012, 02:49:59 PM »
I would like a P-38 that could carry six 500lb bombs in AH.  If it could do six 500lb bombs and ten 5" rockets all the better.  More P-38s being used as strike aircraft probably means fewer P-51Ds being used as strike aircraft and anything that reduces the numbers of P-51Ds is good.

This.

+1  :aok
If we have something to show we will & do post shots, if we have nothing new to show we don't.
HiTech
Adapt , Improvise, Overcome. ~ HiTech
Be a man and shoot me in the back ~ Morfiend

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2012, 06:23:04 PM »
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #26 on: December 15, 2012, 06:54:17 PM »
Good info here I think :salute
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=74

That is a good info, thanks for posting.  I had forgotten that the P38 had a variant that has the Norden bomb sight and that a lead plane with the sight would usher a group of P38's not equipped with the sight to the target and while in formation would release the bombs based on the lead bomber.  Cool stuff.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #27 on: December 16, 2012, 12:13:07 AM »
I feel like that type of thing could work in Aces High. One bomber escorted by a large number of fighters....
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #28 on: December 16, 2012, 08:16:02 AM »
The Mossie 16 works well as a stand in for a Droop Snoot P-38.  It has similar performance to the P-38L and its bomb is large enough that it can be seen easily when it drops.  Run a formation of P-38Ls on a Mossie 16 lead ship in a USAAF skin, drop on the lead ship's drop.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Re: More ordnance updates....
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2012, 09:04:09 AM »
I would like to see the. PTAB clusters modelled on the IL2-m3. This was the battlefield weapon that made the IL2 such a tank killer.
Ludere Vincere