Author Topic: Hurricane Bi-Plane  (Read 4561 times)

Offline beau32

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 615
Hurricane Bi-Plane
« on: January 23, 2013, 06:03:28 PM »
Came across this, thought I would share. Dont know if its been posted before, but its neat looking so I figured I would post.


Quote
Hawker Hurricane, which featured a jettisonable top wing with integral fuel tanks, to reduce take-off distance with heavy loads, and to improve ferry range. The modification was implemented by F. Hills & Sons and was designated the "Hillson FH.40". It proved too heavy to be serviceable.
71 (Eagle) Squadron

"There is always a small microcosm of people who need to explain away their suckage."

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 07:17:02 PM »
first for me seeing that weird arse looking thing :rofl

Offline homersipes

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 08:32:01 PM »
what would the purpose of that thing be?? :headscratch: at first I was thinking the second wing would be added lift for carrying bombs, but then I was like wait this is WW2 not WW1 :lol 

Offline skorpx1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1130
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 08:33:57 PM »
That's interesting to say the least. Definitely new to me, and it makes me wonder what a Spitfire Bi-plane would look like.

Good find.

Offline beau32

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 615
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 10:34:30 PM »
what would the purpose of that thing be?? :headscratch: at first I was thinking the second wing would be added lift for carrying bombs, but then I was like wait this is WW2 not WW1 :lol 

I put the purpose of what it was under the pictures......
71 (Eagle) Squadron

"There is always a small microcosm of people who need to explain away their suckage."

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 11:05:30 PM »
"It proved too heavy to be serviceable."

 :huh Just copy and pasted?

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2013, 11:42:32 PM »
How about the original Wildcat?  :D



Originaly designated the XF3F-1. They eventually got rid of the top wing, made some other significant modifications, and called it the F4F
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Nathan60

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4573
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2013, 12:05:36 AM »
I put the purpose of what it was under the pictures......

wouldn't jettisoning that be dangerous to the vert stab? I mean its got to go straight back.
HamHawk
Wing III-- Pigs on The Wing
FSO--JG54
CHUGGA-CHUGGA, CHOO-CHOO
Pigs go wing deep

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2013, 01:10:07 AM »
Jettison is probably the wrong word.  It was an idea to increase the ferry range, not for use in combat.  It wasn't something they'd kick off in flight, more like a big ferry tank with wings  :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2013, 06:59:52 AM »
wouldn't jettisoning that be dangerous to the vert stab? I mean its got to go straight back.

Maybe but the wing would probably lift upon release.

Offline smoe

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2013, 01:17:54 PM »
Could it have been designed for lower stall speeds? Lower stall speeds are especially good for launching off the aft of battleship/transport and ditching in the middle of the Atlantic. Maybe designed for anti-sub hunting?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2013, 01:39:50 PM »
Could it have been designed for lower stall speeds? Lower stall speeds are especially good for launching off the aft of battleship/transport and ditching in the middle of the Atlantic. Maybe designed for anti-sub hunting?

Read the caption of the OP.  It was basically an extra fuel tank intended to be used in long range ferry flights, nothing more, nothing less.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Online Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8866
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2013, 08:07:40 PM »
Just when I thought the Hurricane couldn't get any uglier.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2013, 08:26:08 PM »
How about the original Wildcat?  :D

(Image removed from quote.)

Originaly designated the XF3F-1. They eventually got rid of the top wing, made some other significant modifications, and called it the F4F

The XF3F-1 and XF4F-1 were different airframe designs. The F3F went through two major upgrades, F3F-2 and F3F-3.

Here's a sketch of the XF4F-1, which was never built before the biplane was abandoned for the XF4F-2 monoplane.

My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Hurricane Bi-Plane
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2013, 09:21:04 PM »
Just when I thought the Hurricane couldn't get any uglier.

I will smack you in the mouth!  :mad:

Hurris are pretty!
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."