Okie Dokie, been thinking about this for awhile now so here it goes...
I see quite often no matter what side, players will take off in bombers, not to bomb anything... but rather to be a target and get kills because they are good at it. I was thinking, of an episode of Dogfights titled "Long Odds" showing different situations where pilots had slim chance of survival and made it out on top.
This one.. is of Olds 666.
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=w4cksG7JoE8 *Start at 2:20 for Old's part*.
Looking at Aces High, I see that there are "production" planes and tanks in the game. But what about singular *iconic* ones? 1st plane that comes to mind is the Red Baron.
I understand there was only one of these because it was an icon of them, they created it. But I was just wondering if that is "enough" to make it unable to be added to the game? Or any "Iconic" plane for that matter.
Of course it would be perked.. not expensive but affordable; since it is a "Gunship". No formation, it was singular. I believe in the last part of the video the narrator speaks of them "Hitting their target" so possibly a payload? Not sure. But I don't see why planes like this can't be added into the game, Take a B17 chop the payload (or cut it entirely if it didn't have any) then add the extra guns to and change the weight to the equivalent of the lowest payout of the current b17 or slightly higher (for the weight of extra guns/ammo).
In words it's simple and in theory (to me) it's possible to add to Aces High.
What are your opinions? Do you see any "reason" of not being able to add *Iconic* planes to the game? If so, what are they?
Just a thought of adding new content and -in a way- honoring those that served by "showing off" their planes.

Respectively,
Tinkles
