you missing the point that it's not that they make the sandwiches at 11 inches, but the fact that they promote them as a foot long or 12 inches.
I'll give you an example from last year. I went to my local grocery store and they had the amaretto disarono at about 12 buck which is 5 bucks lower than normal. so I bought it. the sale ended about 4 days later, but I kept going back to the store and on the shelf they had the same sale price for 2 weeks at 12 bucks. when I went to the register they would ring it up at 17 dollars plust change and I would point it out that the shelf said 12 dollars and they would check and adjust the price. I bought about 5 or 6 bottles untill the manager noticed it and asked one of the clerks to fix the price on the shelf.
I just wonder how many people bought that bottle in those 2 weeks because it was at 12 dollars but didnt notice that they were charged 17. you think they would have removed the sign the first time I told them that the price on the shelf was different.
those few bucks add up pretty soon and the only thing that stops companies is lawsuits.
midway
Following that logic, its just as bad if the sandwich is slightly thinner, but LONGER than 12", as that is still false advertising.
Apparently its an issue of not getting what is advertised, and not about being short-changed. At least according to you. That being said, do you think its reasonable for them to measure every sandwich before they sell it? What is acceptable margin of error? Do you demand they use a microscope to confirm exact length?
Where does it end? I'd rather see a ban on frivolous lawsuits and take the RISK to civil liberties, rather than see society squabble over the length of a sandwich in what is supposed to be an institution of respectability.
You seem to dislike big government and businesses, but step back and look at things with a modicum of rationality. Does squashed bread (and that's all it is, subway isn't trying to cut corners) really warrant a lawsuit?