Author Topic: M18 AP Round  (Read 1023 times)

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
M18 AP Round
« on: February 18, 2013, 03:44:47 PM »
Quick question here that I hope anyone can shed some light on or even HTC.  What AP round is modeled for the M18?  I know historically it had up to (I think) 4 or 5 types of AP ammo.  Reason I ask is the each type round has different penetration performance and since I don't use the M18 that much but I am starting to use it more I thought it would be nice to know for tactical advantage.  I.E. at what range I can engage and effectively expect to penetrate other vehicles while staying far enough away to minimize me being killed?  Any input or info is appreciated.

BigKev

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2013, 04:41:11 PM »
I can help you out with some training on the hellcat if you would like,,, just pm me about a good time to meet up in the TA
Flying since tour 71.

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2013, 05:31:27 PM »
Thanks Whiskey.  I am about to head out but if I get back in time I will check to see if you are on.

BigKev

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2013, 09:57:16 AM »
M62, same on the M4 76mm.


Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2013, 11:53:18 AM »
Quick question here that I hope anyone can shed some light on or even HTC.  What AP round is modeled for the M18?  I know historically it had up to (I think) 4 or 5 types of AP ammo.  Reason I ask is the each type round has different penetration performance and since I don't use the M18 that much but I am starting to use it more I thought it would be nice to know for tactical advantage.  I.E. at what range I can engage and effectively expect to penetrate other vehicles while staying far enough away to minimize me being killed?  Any input or info is appreciated.

BigKev

First, take a look at the AP ability of each AP round in AH.  You can do this while in the hanger, right click on the M18 (for example) and choose the "Vehicle Armor" tab. In that window you will get not only the AP ability of the round in question but you will also get the actual armor thickness of the M18 itself.  The M18 (and M4/76mm) are able to defeat 115mm of armor at 1000 yards and 97mm at 2000 yards **when the impact is perfectly perpendicular (°90) at sea level**.  That is the key in how successful you are in using the AP ability of the gun.  It is so very rare that an AP round impacts at or near °90.  Any time the enemy armor or slanted in any manner the odds start to work against you.

While in an M18 or a M4/76mm, and your target is a Panther sitting head on against you I highly suggest that you consider getting *inside* 1200 yards before even consider exposing yourself to his fire.  the front of his turret is at minimum 100mm and that does not include the 100mm mantlet. The upper hull is 80mm but it is at a °55 angle.  Not only is the armor 80mm but the chances of your shot deflecting are high.  Remember that angle of impact means everything. In the case of the M18 use the speed and get to the flank, or at least draw fire as you attempt to flank so a countryman can get a shot.  

Remember, the front hull of the Panzer IV and the Panther are both 80mm.  The Panzer IV's armor is perpendicular and the Panther's armor is generously sloped.  The T34's only have 47mm of armor on their hull front, but it is sloped back °60.

To bits of advice/information:
First- when using the T34's I suggest you leave the HVAP ammo alone at ranges of 1200 and further. They lose AP ability quickly at longer ranges (1200 yards is at/near the max benefit), the regular AP round out performs the HVAP at ranges further than 1200 yards.  The ONLY time I keep using HVAP at further than 1200 yards is when I'm trying to hit a stationary gv with very light armor.  The flatter trajectory of the HVAP is nice.

Second- I strongly suggest to NOT take all AP rounds, ever. Always take at minimum the smallest HE loading, even to a tank battle.  With an AP round you must have a direct hit on a "critical" component of that gv to destroy or damage it.  If your target is an M18, M8, M3, Wirby, Osty, or a jeep, you do NOT need to even hit it if you're using an HE round to cause damage enough to stop it.  I've destroyed all of those vehicles using HE far more than I have AP.  Just hit near them and the splash damage will destroy tracks and tires, disable turrets, or damage engines.  Just land that HE round anywhere near that speedy jeep and "poof" it is gone. AP rounds have no splash damage, and even if you hit that M3 that does not mean it will destroy it, you need to hit the cab or engine to take it out. Same goes for the M8, M18, etc, etc.  I've forgot the number of times I've damaged turrets on M8's, M18's, and wirbys, or tracked them using an HE round and then used an AP round to finish them off.  HE rounds... have them and use them.

Drop me a PM and give me your email.  I will send you a spread sheet with some gv "quick info" data to reference. That goes for anyone.  I've given the trainers at the AH Trainer's website has this exact info as well.... but alas....  
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2013, 03:15:54 PM »
Thanks for all the input guys.  It really helps.  And for those who offered help I will be contacting you.

Bigkev

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7272
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2013, 08:40:41 PM »
The HE round seems to act like the AP round against buildings and trains.

It does almost nothing at all.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2013, 08:50:18 AM »
The HE round seems to act like the AP round against buildings and trains.

It does almost nothing at all.

That is because the HE round from the M18 and the M4/76mm are the weakest HE round in the game for gv's, aside from the M8 Greyhound.  The HE round only does 103 lbs of damage, and it takes 312 lbs to destroy a building, it takes 4 shots.  Also, keep in mind that the damage dealt to OBJ's and to planes and vehicles are 2 different monsters. While they are similar in nature and there is some correlation, do not assume the two are directly tied together.  We as players do not know the exact "coading" on the matter in terms of damage to gv's, but vs OBJ's it is straight forward.

Still, I strongly suggest the use of HE rounds vs the softer gv's.  If you hit it is destroyed.  If you miss and the shot lands close enough the splash damage will damage it (or even destroy it). Trust me, let go.  Use the HE Force.   :aok   
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7272
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2013, 02:04:16 PM »
Trying to find M8 HE strength but can't find it.

anyone know?

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2013, 02:09:16 PM »
Trying to find M8 HE strength but can't find it.

anyone know?

The M8's HE round does only 31 lbs of damage.  However, it still works good vs soft armored gv's as well.   :aok
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7272
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2013, 08:00:43 AM »
Sweet!  Sweet!

Thanks smokinloon, that really helps.

Offline Bludwulf

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2013, 12:19:46 AM »
Below site talks about the 76mm and a bit on some of the various types of ammo. I think there should be an option like on the T-34 to have HVAP rounds available in addition to the standard AP rounds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/76_mm_gun_M1

Just a thought? :)

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2013, 02:30:09 PM »
Below site talks about the 76mm and a bit on some of the various types of ammo. I think there should be an option like on the T-34 to have HVAP rounds available in addition to the standard AP rounds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/76_mm_gun_M1

Just a thought? :)

I'm not opposed to this, it actually makes sense.  However, one has to wonder just how well the HVAP M93 Shot (High Velocity Armor Piercing Composite Rigid) would do, and would it be worth it?  It would mimic the differences we currently see in the T34's.  Beyond 1200 yards the normal AP is a better round to use.  If HTC were to consider the APCBC M62 Projectile (Armor Piercing Capped Ballistic Cap), that would be something to consider.  It was the same weight as the normal AP round but of much harder construction and therefore was able to defeat more armor, about double the amount of armor actually at all ranges.  I could see HTC allowing for 5-7 rounds of that per M18, it would be on par with the Panther at 2000 yards for AP ability and about be slighter superior than the Panther at 1000 yards by about 10mm.  Reduce the HE rounds and add in a few APCBC rounds.   :aok   
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline TDeacon

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2013, 11:01:28 AM »
I'm not opposed to this, it actually makes sense.  However, one has to wonder just how well the HVAP M93 Shot (High Velocity Armor Piercing Composite Rigid) would do, and would it be worth it?  It would mimic the differences we currently see in the T34's.  Beyond 1200 yards the normal AP is a better round to use.  If HTC were to consider the APCBC M62 Projectile (Armor Piercing Capped Ballistic Cap), that would be something to consider.  It was the same weight as the normal AP round but of much harder construction and therefore was able to defeat more armor, about double the amount of armor actually at all ranges.  I could see HTC allowing for 5-7 rounds of that per M18, it would be on par with the Panther at 2000 yards for AP ability and about be slighter superior than the Panther at 1000 yards by about 10mm.  Reduce the HE rounds and add in a few APCBC rounds.   :aok    

I think you have this backwards.  According to Pyro (above) the AH M18 currently uses the M62 round. What we don't currently have is HVAP, which was better, but issued in limited numbers. 

MH
« Last Edit: April 20, 2013, 11:03:33 AM by TDeacon »

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18 AP Round
« Reply #14 on: April 21, 2013, 09:18:43 AM »
I think you have this backwards.  According to Pyro (above) the AH M18 currently uses the M62 round. What we don't currently have is HVAP, which was better, but issued in limited numbers. 

MH

M79 Shot AP (Armor Piercing) 6.8kg @ 792 m/s
M62 Projectile APCBC (Armor Piercing Capped Ballistic Cap) 7 kg @ 792 m/s
M61 Projectile APC (Armor Piercing Capped) 7kg @ 793 m/s
M93 Shot HVAP (Armor Piercing Composite Rigid) 4.26 kg @ 1036 m/s

My bad.  My fingers typed quicker than my eyes read the charts.  The M93 "HVAP" APCR round would certainly be the bane of almost any tank, including the King Tiger, from any angle.  At 1000 yards, the M93 can defeat 137mm of °30, and at 2000 yards the M93 shot can defeat 94mm of °30 sloped armor.  Not bad.  With the speed of the M18 that may almost be unbalancing, the one thing that stops be from actually saying that is the M18's feasible armor.  FWIW, I almost never use AP rounds vs an M18 because a near miss with at minimum damage a track, damage the engine, or disable the turret.     
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.