Author Topic: Logistic penalty for retreated factories  (Read 1111 times)

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« on: February 27, 2013, 10:02:03 AM »
Right now, having your factories retreat (instantly) is nothing but a boon for your country.

My wish is that once your factories retreat, all factory supplied objects incur an extra 15 minutes downtime until they return to the front, to simulate extended supply lines, delays in delivery, and the time to retool and move the factories.

You'd STILL be safe (on most maps) from the constant attacks the frontline factories suffer, but you'd have an incentive to try to move them back to the front.

In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline manglex1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 66
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2013, 10:06:39 AM »
+1

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4270
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2013, 11:21:37 AM »
Factories retreat? :headscratch: :uhoh
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23939
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2013, 11:24:52 AM »
+1

Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2013, 11:27:41 AM »
I don't care about the strat war (or the war win in general), but that idea actually makes sense.
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23939
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 11:28:06 AM »
Factories retreat? :headscratch: :uhoh

Only for about three years now...  :noid
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2013, 11:29:42 AM »
+1
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4270
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2013, 11:31:08 AM »
I fly mostly MW. Must be a LW thing? :huh
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23939
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2013, 11:35:23 AM »
I fly mostly MW. Must be a LW thing? :huh

It's a large map thing.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3575
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2013, 11:40:37 AM »
+1 as well.

There is no reason to defend a front line ZONE base atm because of this and this solution would certainly fix that. A19 has now been taken the last 3 times Tagma has been up (that I've been counting) by FB's and no effort to retake it because it only helped the other side. I did just see Bishops actually took 19 back, must have been 75% of their comrades yelling NO!
They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline Pand

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
      • Pand's Fighter Wing
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2013, 11:42:01 AM »
This is one of the best wishes I have seen this year. +2

Regards,

Pandemonium
"HORDE not HOARD. Unless someone has a dragon sitting on top of a bunch of La7s somewhere." -80hd

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2013, 12:37:53 PM »
GOOD IDEA!  It makes perfect sense.

or... dont have the factories retreat so far to the rear.  Instead of them moving all the way back perhaps only half way to the rear would be better.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2013, 02:27:23 PM »
Excellent idea, especially since once they retreat any bombers heading there are 163 fodder.
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2013, 02:29:29 PM »
Right now, having your factories retreat (instantly) is nothing but a boon for your country.

My wish is that once your factories retreat, all factory supplied objects incur an extra 15 minutes downtime until they return to the front, to simulate extended supply lines, delays in delivery, and the time to retool and move the factories.

You'd STILL be safe (on most maps) from the constant attacks the frontline factories suffer, but you'd have an incentive to try to move them back to the front.



Fixed.....don't take bases near strat. Why should a side have a penalty for you taking their base?
« Last Edit: February 27, 2013, 02:32:17 PM by HawkerMKII »
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: Logistic penalty for retreated factories
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2013, 02:33:39 PM »
Excellent idea, especially since once they retreat any bombers heading there are 163 fodder.

Should have a 163 base near strat no matter where it is
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>