Author Topic: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?  (Read 2229 times)

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7295
Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« on: March 04, 2013, 12:22:57 PM »
Interesting read over at Vintage wings by RCAF WWII pilot Bill McRae who said that Spitfires were useless for dive bombing.  Bill McRae is a well known WWII RCAF pilot with over 250 combat sorties during WWII.

Article is here: http://www.vintagewings.ca/VintageNews/Stories/tabid/116/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/405/language/en-CA/Spitbomber.aspx.

Fork
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2013, 12:47:02 PM »
The dive bombing problem seems to have been a training issue from the article.

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7295
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2013, 02:14:31 PM »
That's what I thought - but I decided to read other articles Bill wrote which are all online. When Bill was posted to the 401, he complained about the problem of the bombs getting stuck on the racks - they had an unconventional solution of putting a plunger just above the centre rack to push the bomb off the mount but you were stuck if the irons got stuck on the wing hardpoints... (http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Runway/9601/canada2.html)

Great read both pages BTW. And is is another great resource which talks about a lot of the engagements from surviving RCAF pilots who were interviewed about their experiences. http://www.flyingforyourlife.com/pilots/
« Last Edit: March 04, 2013, 02:17:42 PM by Mister Fork »
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2013, 07:58:51 PM »
The Spitfire was a relatively fragile aircraft, so yes in ground attack it was not soo good.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2013, 08:21:55 PM »
Keep it in perspective.  It was not a dedicated Fighter-bomber.

The first Spit-bombers were field modified Spitfire Vs from Malta when they went on the offensive.   

There were trials with any number of variants in regards to dropping bombs.   In early 44 the first couple of England based Spitfire IX squadrons got Spits modified to carry bombs.  These were Spit IX with universal wings and bomb racks added.  The stress on the wings was a problem if the bomb failed to release as was the case on a few occasions.  They were used to go after V-1 sites and the like.  Post D-Day the Spitfire LFIXe and XVIe with clipped and strengthened wings arrived with a centerline bomb rack and wing racks or rocket rails.  These were used by 2 TAF in the fighter bomber role.  They did the job they were given.

Probably the most well known Spitfire bombing run was the one made by six Spitfire XVI of 602 Squadron on March 18, 1945 when they ran a precision low level attack on the V1/V2 headquarters in The Hague on March 18th 1945.

A Spitfire XII pilot who I got to know fairly well finished the war on XVIs flying ground attack.  His take on it was that due to the Luftwaffe having dried up, they had nothing else to do with all the Allied fighters so they kept them busy dropping bombs.   He was shot down dropping a 500 pounder on a Sub pen.  He was still bitter about it as they all knew that there was no way the bombs were going to do any damage.  He finished the war as a POW. 

I've never talked to or corresponded with a Spit pilot who thought a Spitfire carrying bombs was a good idea.  But they were also fighter pilots not bomber pilots and it was never going to feel right.

As a side note, the Griffon Spitfires were considered better for dropping bombs as the view over the nose was better then the Merlin birds.

Spitfire XII MB878 that was used in "Trial Mareth" to test the XII's compatibility with dive bombing. 



The Spit XII squadrons never dropped a bomb operationally, but did get time lugging them in practice for the possibility.  They did lose one XII during the dive bombing practice too possibly to the problem with the bomb not coming unstuck.

The bomb release mechanism was basically a cable running into the cockpit that the pilot pulled.  It was the same as used for the DT.  Another Spit XII pilot I talked to had it come off in his hand when he tried to drop his DT.  No luck and he was unable to switch tanks so he ended up crash landing and becoming a POW.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2013, 02:00:56 AM »
RAF lost quite a few MKVIII due to wings shearing during dive bombing too .  but that was due to how they were assembled after transfer . The whole fleet was grounded for 3 months while they rebuilt the wings .  The pins connecting  the wings to the fuselage , instead of cooling the pins and then heating them in the airframe they just hammered them in . This warped the holes giving room for flexing . as the spit would roll over then pull out of the dive the wings would fold up from the air pressure. 
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7310
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2013, 07:21:07 AM »
Uber GV bomber.

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2013, 01:42:18 PM »
Most of the RAF and RCAF Spitfires that flew with the 2nd TAF 1944-45 had a secondary fighter-bomber role added to their medium-low alt fighter role. Not dive bombing per-se just jabo. No. 126 Wing (RCAF) flew both roles in Spitfires from before D-Day to VE Day in the ETO and their ground tally included:

4468 enemy vehicles destroyed or damaged.
1569 rail trucks flamed or holed.
426 rail lines cut.

The Wing went through 4426 500lb bombs which gives you an idea of their use. They were a common enough weapon despite Jabo not being its primary role.

« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 01:57:29 PM by Squire »
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2013, 12:10:20 PM »
Is there anything that makes a Spitty WORSE at lobbing bombs than it's contemporaries at the same time?
The only thing that I can think of is the sensitive elevator control, however it comes with a plus, - highly effective, and no piston engined aircraft has recovered from as high speeds as the Spitfire.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: Were spitfires really useless as a dive-bomber?
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2013, 11:08:15 AM »
Obviously the small bomb load would limit it's targets but in game the 16 is my favorite dive bomber for taking out armor on the ground.  Those 250#ers will take out a tank if you're accurate with them.  After swooping down the light airframe and relatively light remaining bombs make climbing back up to diving / combat altitude easy as pie.
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.