your logic is flawed in that everyone in the top spots (overall not just a specific categories) game the game in one way or another to get those top spots. Bombing runs where you drop 1 bomb in the center of one town and move on, running from fights, staying way high and picking people, spawn camping, etc etc. What they do is no different, it is just harder to track. The scoring system in itself in my opinion has ruined the game play. It encourages such behavior.
If you do not know where to draw line between Bernie Madoff, KJU, Hitler, and a video game, well nothing I can say will change that.
Pewter, Are you saying you see no difference between milk running and shade killing? How busy and dangerous the virtual skies are varies from hour to hour and can't be controlled, but may be predicted. Players using knowlege of where the enemy is to avoid them is part of the game.
Shade killing is not using game knowlege, it's controlling the enemy. It's controlling the part of the game that is not supposed to be in your control.
It's like having your brother on the opposing basketball team and having him keep turning the ball over to you so you can score 100 points. It's cheating. Plane and simple. Equating strategy and optimization with cheating because they both produce easier results is logically, and ethicly bankrupt.
Not trying to be heavy handed with that wording, I think you are just trying to flipant, and express you disregard for milk runners perhaps.