Author Topic: Nashorn tank destroyer  (Read 3910 times)

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2013, 02:01:12 PM »
Really curious why you think these need to be perked. If it can't take a hit why would anyone want to spend perks on these.

I'm all for them and as I already mentioned the self-propelled guns (SPG) would be great for sacking towns at distance. Not akin to true artillery as their effective range would be about the distance from the usual spawn point.  We have artillery from the sea, why not from vehicles? The rockets on the M4 are about as close as that comes and are kinda pathetic. Pathetic because it takes away any ability to defend yourself from aircraft. SPG's I don't believe were accurate enough to say pinpoint the ack on a base, not do I believe they would be hangar killers anymore than a cv's 8/5"ers (probably quite less.)
They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #31 on: April 19, 2013, 02:18:29 PM »
Really curious why you think these need to be perked. If it can't take a hit why would anyone want to spend perks on these
Because its gun would kill anything in the game.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2013, 02:39:28 PM »
so... so basically the Nashorn has the same main gun as the King Tiger but with no turret, has armor less than the Sherman M4, and an open top to make for an easy kill for Ki-43 Oscar.  Did the Nashorn even have an MG for anti-infantry/anti-airacraft use???

 :headscratch:

I think HTC could put their resources to better use introducing the StG III, Su-100, SdKfz 251/9, Puma, Valentine, and a host of other AFV's. 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #33 on: April 19, 2013, 06:18:28 PM »
Yes, but the mg wasn't fixed to the vehicle.

And it was a highly successful TD. Heavy firepower, good visibility and gun traverse, good mobility. It was fantastic out on the Russian steeps.

So no, you couldn't slug things out with a Tiger. Or even an M8. But who cares when you don't have to? Much better to finish things with a single round from hiding than to trade fire.

And two of those you listed are a ways below the Nashorn on any list you could make. You don't want it, but its not like it's undeserving.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3996
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2013, 01:21:19 AM »

Hehehe, to many people from Calif. moved up there. Alaska is going the same way, and they are starting to infiltrate Texas. :D

dammit! I wanted to live up there! Guess virgina will suffice
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: Nashorn tank destroyer
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2013, 04:20:21 PM »
Nashorn +1 then Elephant tank of course the 200mm of frontal armor it would be more heavily armored than the KT lol and maybe add the IS or some other Russian heavy or TD like the SU100 or SU122 or SU85 just a guess
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars