Monitor -vs- TV

[Nutzoid]

Guys, I could use some recommendations. Currently I'm using a 24'' monitor by Sceptre and it's been a good one. I would however, like to up the size to around 32, maybe 39 inches. I'm not quite sure which way to go. HD TV or actual monitor? I'll wind up keeping the Sceptre as a second/back up, but I'm really at a loss as to what might work better.
So, what do y'all think?

Nutz

[MrRiplEy[H]]

Guys, I could use some recommendations. Currently I'm using a 24'' monitor by Sceptre and it's been a good one. I would however, like to up the size to around 32, maybe 39 inches. I'm not quite sure which way to go. HD TV or actual monitor? I'll wind up keeping the Sceptre as a second/back up, but I'm really at a loss as to what might work better.
So, what do y'all think?

Nutz

If you plan to do any gaming on it a real monitor is definitely a better choice. Most tv sets have a bad input lag due to their image processing systems. On some tv sets there is a gaming mode which will eliminate some of the lag. Just keep in mind that while tvs may advertise high refresh rates, most of them will not actually refresh the actual image at more than 30-60hz. Even the 3D models may not be able to display 120hz in computer use.

So a monitor is definitely the safer bet.

[Masherbrum]

Monitor.   

[MADe]

I myself use a SONY Bravia LCD 40". 60 Hz refresh, 8 ms. Uses old pc input, 15 pin dsub. Picture is nice, large image is nice, can input several puters or devices. One day I will test it against a digital monitor. I think it works great. The cockpit on screen almost scales to my head.
Luck

[Pand]

Monitor is definitely better but the cost will hardly make it worth it.  I've got a Sony Bravia LCD 42", 120hz, connected via HDMI--- looks and runs beautiful.  I couldn't be happier.

Be careful on the cheaper/lower quality HDTVs, as some that have the same specs will look like trash when connected to a computer.  I bought 2 different HDTVs (cheaper ones) before I finally ended up with the Sony.   They were, at best 60% of the sharpness/quality of what I'm running now for about $100 more (at the time).

If you have a particular TV in mind check google for reviews and make sure you can return it if you're not happy.

[Randy1]

a large tv also has the advantage of using lower FOV to the point you can approach life size cockpits if large enough tv is in the budget  with tracker this is kind of neat.

[MrRiplEy[H]]

If the tv has input lag it will make playing any fast paced games a nightmare because the screen will lag literally inches behind on fast moves which means basically what you think you aim has already passed your crosshairs in real life.

[Karnak]

You can also get higher resolution (which may or may not be a match for your PC) with a monitor, but TVs, in practicality, cap at 1080p.

[morfiend]

You can also get higher resolution (which may or may not be a match for your PC) with a monitor, but TVs, in practicality, cap at 1080p.

  This is not exactly true anymore! the new 4k TV's have a much higher resolution but also a hefty price tag, $270,000 will set you up with a triple head to go system that will cover a 12 foot wall!!!!

   I was checking 1 out,it's price was only 90K!


   

[numb1]

People still use 1080p lol..

[MrRiplEy[H]]

  This is not exactly true anymore! the new 4k TV's have a much higher resolution but also a hefty price tag, $270,000 will set you up with a triple head to go system that will cover a 12 foot wall!!!!

   I was checking 1 out,it's price was only 90K!


   

A single 4k tv will require a 500 dollar graphics card to run at playable framerates. So if you triple or quad sli titans you may get playable framerates on multimonitor setup

[morfiend]

A single 4k tv will require a 500 dollar graphics card to run at playable framerates. So if you triple or quad sli titans you may get playable framerates on multimonitor setup

  Yes and if you can afford a single 4K tv I don't think a 500 dollar vidcard is going to be an issue!

   Whats 1500$ compared to 270K dollars?


   

[MrRiplEy[H]]

  Yes and if you can afford a single 4K tv I don't think a 500 dollar vidcard is going to be an issue!

   Whats 1500$ compared to 270K dollars?


  

A single 4k tv is 1500 bucks and upwards. The pre-production sample cost 270k. Mass produced versions are already available. http://hdguru3d.com/seiki-4k-tv-available-for-under-1500/

[numb1]

Input lag on TVs is horrible As most are over 50ms..

[morfiend]

A single 4k tv is 1500 bucks and upwards. The pre-production sample cost 270k. Mass produced versions are already available. http://hdguru3d.com/seiki-4k-tv-available-for-under-1500/

  I was talking about spending $1500 on vidcards,the 4K tv I was looking at was a 90 inch screen that cost $90,000 dollars. This is where I came up with the $270,000 price as that's what 3 screens would cost.

  Doesn't really matter though......