Author Topic: R4M for 262's  (Read 1609 times)

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2013, 08:40:55 AM »
My only issue with R4M is that you shouldn't be able to fire one or two rockets, you would only have a one time shot as in real life.
As for accuracy - you would be extremely lucky to get one hit if any on a bomber as they made a shotgun cone effect.

However like everything else, it would be perked even more - and the rocket rails would degrade the 262 - so beware what you wish for.
JG 52

Offline ReVo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2013, 08:59:27 AM »
- no. Like the 163 the 262 did not play a big enough roll in WW2 so neither should really be in the game to start with

Translation: I don't like luft birds so make them go away.
XO Jagdgeschwader 53 'Pik As'

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2013, 09:43:42 PM »
Translation: I don't like luft birds so make them go away.

No only 8 kills for a 163 in WW2....and why is that a game changer in the war....can you answer that????? The birds and gv's in this game are based on.....how many made, and impact on the war. 262 not much better!
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3996
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #18 on: May 25, 2013, 01:50:54 PM »
No only 8 kills for a 163 in WW2....and why is that a game changer in the war....can you answer that????? The birds and gv's in this game are based on.....how many made, and impact on the war. 262 not much better!
163 not a game changer. But the 262 was not to be taken lightly. Somedays only 20 262's would attack 1000 bombers, and like 750 mustangs.

Had there been more 262's things would be different.
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #19 on: May 25, 2013, 02:58:45 PM »
    Problem with the R4Ms is the same one the 262s have.  There are no prectical limits to the numbers you can deploy.
The logistical concerns that they had to deal with in real life don't exist in AH.  

I suggest you familirate yourself with this perk system that AH has. I'm sure you find it very facinating and that it addresses this "concern" you have.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2013, 06:13:36 AM »
163 not a game changer. But the 262 was not to be taken lightly. Somedays only 20 262's would attack 1000 bombers, and like 750 mustangs.

Had there been more 262's things would be different.

"HAD" there been and only 542 kills. Like I said not a good argument for having either in the game. I thought to have a a/c or gv in game it had to have mass production, service time, not some end of the war experimental thing :salute
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline alpini13

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2013, 10:18:26 AM »
 :aok, they had em, they used em, we should have em too

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3996
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2013, 10:36:00 AM »
"HAD" there been and only 542 kills. Like I said not a good argument for having either in the game. I thought to have a a/c or gv in game it had to have mass production, service time, not some end of the war experimental thing :salute
mass production is not a requirement.  Combat and seeing squadron strength is, hense why we have the jets.
But I'm an idiot for posting this in the wrong Forum again :bhead

btw Germany had a bunch of fighters at in 1945, matter of fact, correct me if I'm wrong, bu I believe their production output was at an all time high. Just no av-gas :aok
 :salute

I'm simy wishing for an additional atribute for a tool some of like to use. Curveball for scenarios to boot.

In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline ReVo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2013, 11:37:52 AM »
"HAD" there been and only 542 kills. Like I said not a good argument for having either in the game. I thought to have a a/c or gv in game it had to have mass production, service time, not some end of the war experimental thing :salute

Then also remove the P47M, F4U-1C and if memory serves me correctly there weren't a whole lot of Tempests or Spit16's by the end of the war. :)
XO Jagdgeschwader 53 'Pik As'

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2013, 11:46:35 AM »
"HAD" there been and only 542 kills. Like I said not a good argument for having either in the game. I thought to have a a/c or gv in game it had to have mass production, service time, not some end of the war experimental thing :salute

Hitech hasn't stated clearly, but the general idea has always been "seen combat" If you look at the F4u-1C only 200 or so were made? TA-152 less then that.

I say leave the 163 alone for Aces High - its not a game changer, rather its a Rocket powered interceptor that stops idiots from porking HQ every hour - imagine if we didn't have the 163? the 163 also has enough short comings - Lack of range and ammo - not everyone can hit with twin 30mms - and if you are not gentle with the throttle you are out of fuel in 7 minutes.

262 on the other hand is not a game changer either - for the perks involved - how many people exclusively fly the me-262? Very few. Now I have in the past flew dozens of 262 sorties back to back, if you stick around one area to long, 262s start hunting you. On top of that the 262 seems to me to be extremely weak when it comes to taking hits, you will lose an engine or oil almost automatically - trying to land on one engine is extremely risky, let alone if you lose both engines as the 262 does NOT glide, secondly if a 262 loses an engine, its best speed can be caught by most midwar fighters.
JG 52

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7482
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2013, 12:25:24 PM »
let alone if you lose both engines as the 262 does NOT glide


I have found it to be a very good glider.
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10

MW148 LW301
"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2013, 12:31:46 PM »
Then also remove the P47M, F4U-1C and if memory serves me correctly there weren't a whole lot of Tempests or Spit16's by the end of the war. :)
Those, and the Me262 and Me163, all had mass production.  There are no units in this game that were not produced in an industrial manner.

"Winners" of the low production awards in AH:

Ta152H-1 (less than 50)
Ostwind (less than 50)
Wirbelwind (less than 50)
Brewster (less than 100)
P-47M (100)
F4U-1C (200)
C.205 (250)
Me163 (370)
N1K2-J (416)

Everything else is well over 500 so far as I know.  Me262 was about 1200 (only a couple hundred were used though), Tempest was was about 700 and the Spitfire Mk XVI was about 1200, or about 4300 if you merge it with the Spitfire LF.Mk IX.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2013, 12:39:18 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline hotcoffe

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 542
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #27 on: June 18, 2013, 09:50:30 AM »
+1
- Der Wander Zirkus -

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #28 on: June 18, 2013, 10:26:59 AM »
btw Germany had a bunch of fighters at in 1945, matter of fact, correct me if I'm wrong, bu I believe their production output was at an all time high. Just no av-gas :aok
 :salute

Sorry, I have to correct you since you're wrong:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_aircraft_production_during_World_War_II

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3996
Re: R4M for 262's
« Reply #29 on: June 18, 2013, 10:31:27 AM »
Sorry, I have to correct you since you're wrong:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_aircraft_production_during_World_War_II

oi 1944 it is :cheers:





Btw were just hunting for a post to correct me? :neener:
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle