Author Topic: P-47 C-5  (Read 1764 times)

Offline alpini13

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
P-47 C-5
« on: June 07, 2013, 06:06:37 PM »
  the first p-47 thunderbolt to be used in combat(602 produced) introduced  by the 56FG(ZEMPKE"S)in february 1943, would be a great addition for all arenas and fso and scenarios.  here is the

3rd March 1943 full report on performance and comparison to other A/C   http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-47/p-47c-afdu.html

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2013, 06:29:52 PM »
Sure. #19  :)

Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2013, 10:09:41 PM »
+1 I need my beast lol I need my big armored JUG that can shake off them 30mm from them 190s lol
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars

Offline Dragon Tamer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2013, 11:31:21 PM »
+1

I also think those plucky brits need to quit picking on the yanks equipment.  :old:

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2013, 09:28:19 AM »
 the first p-47 thunderbolt to be used in combat(602 produced) introduced  by the 56FG(ZEMPKE"S)in february 1943, would be a great addition for all arenas and fso and scenarios.  here is the

3rd March 1943 full report on performance and comparison to other A/C   http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-47/p-47c-afdu.html


Bob Johnson's first combat AC was "Lucky" and was a C model.  Not sure if it was a C5 though

Anyway - even though we have FIVE P-47 variants...  :aok
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline aztec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1800
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2013, 04:35:27 PM »
+1 :aok

Offline Dragon Tamer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2013, 10:58:55 PM »
Anyway - even though we have FIVE P-47 variants...  :aok

Can you really ever have enough though?

Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2013, 03:19:33 PM »
+1 I need my beast lol I need my big armored JUG that can shake off them 30mm from them 109s lol
Fixed, and...NO... you will eat your taters and you will like it! :D
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous

Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2013, 03:25:20 PM »
Fixed, and...NO... you will eat your taters and you will like it! :D
make me your not my mommy :D :D :neener:
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2013, 04:14:16 PM »
 the first p-47 thunderbolt to be used in combat(602 produced) introduced  by the 56FG(ZEMPKE"S)in february 1943, would be a great addition for all arenas and fso and scenarios.  here is the

3rd March 1943 full report on performance and comparison to other A/C   http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-47/p-47c-afdu.html

Effectively, this will be our D-11 without WEP.

The last significant piece that is missing from the 47s roster is a razorback with a paddle-blade prop, preferably with wing shackles. This means a model between D-11(15?) and D-23, the latter being the ultimate razorback.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline 4Prop

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2013, 06:34:38 PM »
Quote
Armour

11.            The pilot is protected by bullet-proof plate of glass set inside the 'V' shaped windscreen, and by 9 mm. armour behind his seat and head. The fuel tanks are all self-sealing but the oil tank is not so treated. There is no protection for the supercharger turbo housing

That'll help with those 1 ping pilot wounds.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2013, 06:43:47 PM »
That'll help with those 1 ping pilot wounds.
It is exactly what the P-47D-11 in AH already has.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6036
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2013, 05:38:01 PM »
Thought Johnsons first plane was half pint?


Think C Models were a tad faster then the D models....gettin' old...... hard to remember.

Have the literature around here someplace  :rofl :rofl :rofl
« Last Edit: June 10, 2013, 05:51:52 PM by Hajo »
- The Flying Circus -

Offline Megalodon

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2013, 09:49:45 PM »
Thought Johnsons first plane was half pint?


Think C Models were a tad faster then the D models....gettin' old...... hard to remember.

Have the literature around here someplace  :rofl :rofl :rofl

I found it   :old:

Training
P-47B

61st
P-47C-2 41-6235 HV-P “Half Pint”
P-47D-5 RE 42-8461 HV-P "Lucky"
P-47D-15 RE 42-76234 HV-P "All Hell"

Edit: "All Hell" may have been a "Double Lucky" as well.

62nd
P-47D-21 RE 42-25512 LM-Q "Penrod and Sam"

 :salute
« Last Edit: June 10, 2013, 10:38:37 PM by Megalodon »
Okay..Add 2 Country's at once, Australia and France next plane update Add ...CAC Boomerang and the Dewoitine D.520

Offline Myg

  • aka Torquila (PNG)
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 236
Re: P-47 C-5
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2013, 05:36:45 AM »
No objection to more p-47's.

They are a stable diet for some, and some are a stable diet for them.

Always glad to see more of them.