side-switching abuse

[Slash27]

There is too much 'care' about winning.... Think of it as a friendly game at the park, as people join, people switch teams to balance, as people leave, people switch teams to balance it. In the end of the day, all that matters is that you have FUN!

hippy

[Ardy123]

hippy

[JimmyC]

I never bat for the other side...

[RotBaron]

You flying again? For the longest time I only saw you in GVs..


My point is people should be allowed to switch freely, its only a game.. Ahhem..

LOL better, too many ahhems,

I do see your point, I guess personally it just doesn't fit/work for me, maybe my take/pov on this will change as time goes on. That happened for me when I first began. I wanted to be involved in winning the map every time I logged in. Although, my first country was Bish 


Anyways at some, maybe I'll also understand someone saying the following paraphrase (which grammatically shouldn't be in quotes-I know) "freakin so & so's, complain so much, not like we have it camped/hoarding/vulching them that bad, what whiners/babies/losers," etc.  I have seen/heard this many times, only to get shot down by that same guy the next day.

Oh well, wang-chung.

 

[DREDIOCK]

The basic problem is the flawed strats retreat concept.

Agreed. I much preferred the old zone based strat system over the current setup.

A nice compromise might be to have local zone strats mixed throughout a country with the main national strats  moved way back like HQ currently is. Make the national strats have greater effect,stay down longer and take more trips to resupply to make the trip worth it. With local zone strats staying down shorter and easier to resupply unless the national strats are down

[Tordon22]

A side swap time under a decade is unacceptable.

Learn some loyalty, you pukes.

[Arlo]

 

A side swap time under a decade is unacceptable.

Learn some loyalty, you pukes.