Author Topic: 109E3 inclusion  (Read 2328 times)

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7287
109E3 inclusion
« on: July 11, 2013, 06:26:39 PM »
My dream of a 109E3 in AcesHigh.










for more on the Swiss E3; http://toniosky7.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/messerschmitt-bf-109-e3-walkaround.html







JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube-20Dolby10
Twitch - Glendinho


HOST: HiTech Shot Down Skyyr Kill#1

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2013, 08:05:05 PM »
Wait a minute...those last screenshots aren't real life.... :eek:

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Online Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8935
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2013, 09:42:10 PM »
I like the E3. We NEED the E7.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2013, 11:03:37 PM »
109 Bs and Cs would be right in line with my evil plan ..... er .....





And .... early Es are fine, too.


Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2013, 07:52:17 AM »
okay I'm gonna feel stupid asking this but whats the difference between the E3 and E4??? they both look the same
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7287
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2013, 10:39:21 AM »
okay I'm gonna feel stupid asking this but whats the difference between the E3 and E4??? they both look the same

Nicer, pilot friendly, birdcage canopy without the head-board, and the option of 4xMGs (cannonless) which gave it a weight save over the E4.

There were E3s with 4xMGs and the 20mm through the prop hub, but they couldn't get the MGFF to reliably fire when housed in the hub at the time.

JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube-20Dolby10
Twitch - Glendinho


HOST: HiTech Shot Down Skyyr Kill#1

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2013, 10:53:44 AM »
Nicer, pilot friendly, birdcage canopy without the head-board, and the option of 4xMGs (cannonless) which gave it a weight save over the E4.

There were E3s with 4xMGs and the 20mm through the prop hub, but they couldn't get the MGFF to reliably fire when housed in the hub at the time.

^ this

A few early E-3's still had the guns of the E-1: 2 x 7mm in the nose plus 2 x 7mm in the wings.  Messerschmitt was unable to get the 20mm motorkannon to work until the later F-1 version, near the end of the year in 1940.

As for adding more variants for use in events:

The E-1 could be matched against either the Dewoitine d.520 or Morane-Saulnier M.S.406 in a "Battle of France" event.

The E-7 would find use in both Russian Front and North Africa events as the principal jagdbomber for the Axis.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2013, 10:57:33 AM by Bino »


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2013, 01:17:59 PM »
The E-1 could be matched against either the Dewoitine d.520 or Morane-Saulnier M.S.406 in a "Battle of France" event.

The E-7 would find use in both Russian Front and North Africa events as the principal jagdbomber for the Axis.

You Axis guys are a funny lot.  You ask for small variations in German stuff to be covered, making the differences out to be large, but never ask for the same of opposing Allied equipment.  Here you are asking for Bf109 versions for scenarios for which we largely lack any Allied aircraft having only the Soviet I-16-24 as appropriate.  Even the Hurricane Mk I isn't really appropriate for the BoF due to its 100 octane fuel and variable pitch prop.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2013, 01:22:48 PM »
You Axis guys are a funny lot.  You ask for small variations in German stuff to be covered, making the differences out to be large, but never ask for the same of opposing Allied equipment.  Here you are asking for Bf109 versions for scenarios for which we largely lack any Allied aircraft having only the Soviet I-16-24 as appropriate.  Even the Hurricane Mk I isn't really appropriate for the BoF due to its 100 octane fuel and variable pitch prop.

That would be great, too, but the topic of this thread *is* the Bf-109E-3.

Start a thread that lobbies for an earlier Hurricane Mk.I with lower octane and a fixed-pitch wooden prop ("Piece Of Cake" anyone?) and I will jump right in.   :aok


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Zacherof

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3992
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2013, 08:02:07 PM »
You Axis guys are a funny lot.  You ask for small variations in German stuff to be covered, making the differences out to be large, but never ask for the same of opposing Allied equipment.  Here you are asking for Bf109 versions for scenarios for which we largely lack any Allied aircraft having only the Soviet I-16-24 as appropriate.  Even the Hurricane Mk I isn't really appropriate for the BoF due to its 100 octane fuel and variable pitch prop.
Den give us what we needs are 2 bladed spits and hurri's :old:
In game name Xacherof
USN Sea Bee
**ELITE**
I am a meat popsicle

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8511
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2013, 04:54:00 PM »
Don't know if any of you already have this: the Aero Detail book of the 109E series (early 109 pron  :eek:):

http://www.mediafire.com/?1jawbgay7uzodig

Enjoy!
”It's a shame that he's gone, but the shame is entirely his”
HiTech 2 - Skyyr 0

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7287
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2013, 07:55:47 PM »
Don't know if any of you already have this: the Aero Detail book of the 109E series (early 109 pron  :eek:):

http://www.mediafire.com/?1jawbgay7uzodig

Enjoy!

Thank you Shida, I'm going to need... some alone time...



I may be a while..
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube-20Dolby10
Twitch - Glendinho


HOST: HiTech Shot Down Skyyr Kill#1

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2013, 08:10:59 PM »
I like the E3. We NEED the E7.

Yep.  E7 would be a much better addition.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2013, 10:00:02 PM »
What makes the 109E3 different from our current E model?

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2013, 10:16:54 PM »
And .... early Es are fine, too.

(Image removed from quote.)
These don't look
right