I've never believed that 30 percent nonsense either, no air force could even have an air force with that rate of accidents just regarding landing quirkyness.
Still, they did lose a fair number, and it was known to be a trickier than average plane with the narrow undercarriage set up. I'll never argue how well it performed in the air, and how it was scalable right to the end of the war, and was never absolutely outclassed. I remember when Galland spoke in Canada at an RCAF thing, and he said that he would take the 109 still even if he could choose any prop aircraft he wanted during the war, mainly due to the acceleration and other factors.
Great video, yes that pilot didn't have much altitude in order to find some place safe. Luckily there were a lot of fields around for him to pick from.