Author Topic: Water Bombers  (Read 4517 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2013, 01:51:15 PM »
That doesn't make sense earl. The A-26 was the original designation of the a/c.

In June of 1948, the Air Force decided that it no longer needed light attack bombers, and the Attack designation category was officially eliminated. The designation of the two Invader types was changed to B-26B and B-26C respectively. There was no danger of confusion with the Martin B-26 Marauder, since that aircraft was by that time out of service. (but it seems there is confusion today :devil)
:airplane: OK, they redesignated the 26C to an A-26, but again, the reason was the political situation in Thialand sir!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2013, 03:36:09 PM »
:airplane: In view of the damageing forest fires burning now in the western U.S., I thought it might of interest to view some of the "fire fighters" with wings and a little of the history of aerial water bombing! Airtankers or water bombers are fixed-wing aircraft fitted with tanks that can be filled on the ground at an air tanker base or, in the case of flying boats and amphibious aircraft, by skimming water from lakes, reservoirs, or large rivers.


 


PBY Catalina flying boat(Image removed from quote.)
Various aircraft have been used over the years for firefighting. In 1947, shortly after World War Two ended, the United States Air Force and United States Forest Service did an experiment in which World War Two aircraft dropped water bombs similar to those used in wartime napalm attacks. It was not found successful, and internal water tanks were found the solution.[6] Though World War II and Korean War-era bombers were for a long time the mainstay of the aerial firefighting fleet, and are still in use newer purpose-built tankers are coming online. The smallest are the Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs). These are agricultural sprayers that generally drop about 800 US gallons (3,000 l) of water or retardant. An example is the Airtractor AT-802F, which can deliver around 800 US gallons (3,000 l) of water or fire retardant solution each drop. Another is the Ukrainan Antonov An-2 biplane which can be fitted with floats that can scoop water from the surface of a body of water. An advantage of the biplane is that it has a lower stall speed than a monoplane meaning it a can fly more slowly over a fire which enhances the accuracy of water or retardant drops. Medium aircraft include the S-2 Tracker (retrofitted with turboprop engines as the S-2T) as used by the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (CDF), as well as Conair Group Inc. of Abbotsford, British Columbia, while the Douglas DC-4, the DC-7, the Lockheed C-130 Hercules, P-2V Neptune, Lockheed P-3 Orion and, commercial equivalent, the L188 Electra as used by Air Spray Ltd., of Red Deer, Alberta and others have been used as heavy tankers.

(Image removed from quote.)

The largest aerial firefighter currently in use is a Boeing 747 aerial firefighter, known as the Evergreen Supertanker that can carry 24,000 US gallons (90,800 l) fed by a pressurized drop system. The Supertanker entered service for the first time in 2009, fighting a fire in Cuenca, Spain. The tanker made its first American operation on August 31, 2009 at the Oak Glen Fire.

(Image removed from quote.)

The next largest aerial firefighters currently in use include two converted Martin Mars flying boats in British Columbia (one of which was brought to southern California in September 2007 to help battle the wildfires there). Each Martin Mars can carry approximately 7,200 US gallons (27,300 l) of water or fire retardant each, and the Tanker 910, a converted McDonnell Douglas DC-10 that can carry 12,000 US gallons (45,400 l) of water or retardant. The Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations operates convertible-to-cargo IL-76 airtankers that can carry up to 15,000 US gallons (56,800 l) but have been operating with 11,000 US gallons (41,600 l) tanking systems, and a few of Beriev Be-200 amphibians.

Bombardier's Dash 8 Q Series aircraft are the basis of new, next-generation air tankers. Cascade Aerospace has converted two pre-owned Q400s to act as part-time water bomber and part-time transport for France's Sécurité Civile, one of which is registered F-ZBMC, while Neptune Aviation is converting a pre-owned Q300 as a prototype to augment their P2V aircraft. Air Spray Aviation is also in the process of converting a BAe146 to the role of air tanker at its maintenance facility in Chico, California. Another modern-era passenger jet now being considered for conversion to aerial firefighting in the US, is the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series.

(Image removed from quote.)

Similar in configuration to the World War II–era PBY Catalina, the Canadair CL-215 Scooper, and Bombardier CL-415 SuperScooper are designed and built specifically for firefighting. The "Super Scoopers" are not common in the United States where only 2 operate seasonally in southern California. Los Angeles County leases two CL-415s from the Province of Quebec during the fall when the Santa Ana winds are at their worst. 6 American owned CL-215s operate for various State and Federal agencies. Critics of scoopers in the US claim that there is not enough suitable water in fire prone states. CL-215s have been employed with success in North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Washington, Alaska, Northern Idaho, and Monta


I saw a PBY tanker this past weekend, and the CL-415s are worth their weight in gold, we've leased them since I think '92 or '94 and really should own a pair by now.  I think the state should have a few with CalFire too, they're dependent on nearby lakes or the ocean for rapid refilling and dropping, but when conditions are right it's like watching a conveyor belt in action dousing the fire.


Here's one parked at the lake a few years ago. It's really awesome to see, but not a good thing when it's here.



RDD is a service base for the fire bombers so I see the land based aircraft flying out all summer long.

I was just remembering the '08 fires up there yesterday with the Rim Fire still burning today, I was in Trinity County.  I still have some '08 wine grown nearby that tastes like smoke.  Few weeks ago I saw the C-130 roaring south down the the N.Fork and heading twords the upper lake after a drop.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2013, 03:44:33 PM by Babalonian »
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2013, 02:53:11 PM »
I saw a PBY tanker this past weekend, and the CL-415s are worth their weight in gold, we've leased them since I think '92 or '94 and really should own a pair by now.  I think the state should have a few with CalFire too, they're dependent on nearby lakes or the ocean for rapid refilling and dropping, but when conditions are right it's like watching a conveyor belt in action dousing the fire.


I was just remembering the '08 fires up there yesterday with the Rim Fire still burning today, I was in Trinity County.  I still have some '08 wine grown nearby that tastes like smoke.  Few weeks ago I saw the C-130 roaring south down the the N.Fork and heading twords the upper lake after a drop.
:airplane: A few years back, can't remember when it was, early 2000's I think, I remember seeing video of C-130 which was dispensing fire retardant, somewhere out west, which one of the wings folded back over the fuselage and of course they crashed and all on board were killed. Post accident investigation showed a number of previous  cracks in the wing area around and including the main spar. If memory serves correctly, I believe it was an old A or B model, can't remember which.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6863
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2013, 03:31:34 PM »
In July 2000 watched a PB4Y (USN B-24) start up and take off at Grey Bulls WY to bomb a local fire.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2013, 03:46:34 PM »
:airplane: A few years back, can't remember when it was, early 2000's I think, I remember seeing video of C-130 which was dispensing fire retardant, somewhere out west, which one of the wings folded back over the fuselage and of course they crashed and all on board were killed. Post accident investigation showed a number of previous  cracks in the wing area around and including the main spar. If memory serves correctly, I believe it was an old A or B model, can't remember which.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bDNCac2N1o


That's a nightmare right there...
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2013, 05:32:57 PM »


 :aok

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2013, 06:06:27 PM »
Awesome video of a Be-200 doing multiple water pickups in Portugal: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__XflBfmVs4
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2833
Re: Water Bombers
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2013, 08:15:37 PM »
ezstir in my squad flew b17s as a waterbomber if i remember this correctly.
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera