Author Topic: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber  (Read 4524 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« on: August 28, 2013, 10:25:24 AM »
 :airplane: The B-26 Marauder was the first American bomber to strike back at the Japanese after Pearl Harbor! B-26 Marauder/B-25 Mitchell. In February 1942, the 22d Bombardment Group was ordered to Australia, being assigned to bases around Townsville. The B-26 first entered combat on 5 April 1942, when the 22nd Group took off from their bases in Queensland, refueled at Port Moresby, and then attacked Japanese facilities at Rabaul. Each B-26 had a 250-gallon bomb bay and carried a 2000– pound bombload. The Marauder was the only medium bomber available in the Pacific, and generally, no fighter escort was available leaving the Marauders were on their own if they encountered enemy fighters. There were two groups equipped with B-26s, the 22nd and 38th, with two squadrons of the 38th Bombardment Group (69th and 70th) equipped with B-26s. In this series of attacks on Japanese-held facilities in the Dutch East Indies, the B-26s gained a reputation for speed and ruggedness against strong opposition from Japanese Zero fighters. Attacks on Rabaul ended on 24 May, after 80 sorties had flown. A series of unescorted raids were made on Japanese installations in the Lae area. These raids were vigorously opposed by Zero fighters. In the 84 sorties flown against Lae between 24 April and 4 July 1942, three Marauders were lost. As the Allies pushed northward in the South Pacific, temporary airfields had to be cut out of the jungle and these runways were generally fairly short. The North American B-25 Mitchell had a shorter takeoff run than the B-26, and it began to take over the medium bomber duties. Although it was admitted that the B-26 could take greater punishment, was defensively superior, and could fly faster with a heavier bomb load, the B-25 had better short-field characteristics, good sortie rate, and minimal maintenance requirements. In addition, the B-25 was considerably easier to manufacture and had suffered from fewer developmental problems. At this time, there were more B-25s available for South Pacific duty because it had been decided to send the B-26 Marauder to the Mediterranean theatre. Consequently, it was decided to adopt the B-25 as the standard medium bomber for the entire Pacific theatre, and to use the B-26 exclusively to Twelfth Air Force in the Mediterranean with some later being used by Ninth Air Force in the European theatres.

The B-26 Marauders had a terrible breaking in time when first introduced to the U.S. Army Air Forces. The wing on the 26 was so short that it was called a number of names. The B-26 was not an aircraft for novices. Unfortunately, due to the need of training many pilots quickly for the war, a number of relatively inexperienced pilots got into the cockpit and the accident rate increased accordingly. This occurred at the same time as more experienced B-26 pilots of the 22nd, 38th and 42d Bombardment Groups were proving the merits of the bomber.

For a time in 1942, pilots in training believed that the B-26 could not be flown on one engine. This was disproved by a number of experienced pilots, including Jimmy Doolittle.

In 1942, Glenn Martin was called before the Senate Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program, or Truman Committee, which was investigating defense contracting abuses. Senator Harry Truman, the committee chairman, asked Martin why the B-26 had troubles. Martin responded that the wings were too short. Truman asked why the wings weren't changed. When Martin said the plans were too far along and besides, his company already had the contract, Truman's response was quick and to the point: In that case, the contract would be canceled. Martin said corrections to the wings would be made. (By February 1943, the newest model, the B-26B-10, had an additional 6 feet (1.8 m) of wingspan, plus uprated engines, more armor and larger guns.)

Indeed, the regularity of crashes by pilots training at MacDill Field—up to 15 in one 30-day period—led to the exaggerated catchphrase, "One a day in Tampa Bay." Apart from accidents occurring over land, 13 Marauders ditched in Tampa Bay in the 14 months between the first one on 5 August 1942 to the final one on 8 October 1943.

B-26 crews gave the aircraft the nickname "Widowmaker". Other colorful nicknames included "Martin Murderer", "Flying Coffin", "B-Dash-Crash", "Flying Prostitute" (so-named because it was so fast and had "no visible means of support," referring to its small wings) and "Baltimore potato" (a reference to the city where Martin was based).



When Martin aircraft company made the changes, the B-26 became a much more docile aircraft and was a lot easier to transion from pilot training schools into the multi-engine aircraft. The U.S. Army Air Forces needed bomber pilots and lots of them!

This is a pic of the final version of the B-26.

The B-26 Marauder was used mostly in Europe but also saw action in the Mediterranean and the Pacific. In early combat the aircraft took heavy losses but was still one of the most successful medium-range bombers used by the U.S. Army Air Forces. The B-26 was initially deployed on combat missions in the South West Pacific in the spring of 1942, but most of the B-26s subsequently assigned to operational theaters were sent to England and the Mediterranean area.

By the end of World War II, it had flown more than 110,000 sorties and had dropped 150,000 tons (136,078 tonnes) of bombs, and had been used in combat by British, Free French and South African forces in addition to U.S. units. In 1945, when B-26 production was halted, 5,266 had been built.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2013, 10:28:18 AM by earl1937 »
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2013, 12:04:39 PM »
(Image removed from quote.) This is a pic of the final version of the B-26.

But it wasn't built by Martin.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2013, 12:22:28 PM »
But it wasn't built by Martin.


*edit* Didn't see the last picture of the Invader Earl1 confused with the Marauder.  Yeah, the Martin Company definitely didn't design and build that plane.

ack-ack
« Last Edit: August 28, 2013, 12:31:07 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2013, 12:26:07 PM »
It was built by the Glenn L. Martin Company.

ack-ack

Isn't that last pic just a redesignated A-26?

In fact it's the exact same pic in the infobox on Wikipedia's webpage on the A-26.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2013, 12:28:57 PM »
Isn't that last pic just a redesignated A-26?

In fact it's the exact same pic in the infobox on Wikipedia's webpage on the A-26.

Yes, the last picture is of the Invader.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2013, 12:33:21 PM »
Yes, the last picture is of the Invader.

ack-ack

That's what Milo was referring to. It's an entirely different plane than the rest of the post.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2013, 02:20:18 PM »
That's what Milo was referring to. It's an entirely different plane than the rest of the post.
:airplane: Sorry Guys, didn't mean to mis-lead anyone! The last pic is indeed a pic of the final version of the B-26, which was built by Douglas, not by Martin! I can see by the way I posted the pic's how it mislead people! Sorry!  :salute

This a pic of one of the last 26's built by Douglas.

Business end of "Pure" B-26 bomber!

Pic of one of the "A-26's used by USAF in Thailand during Vietnam war! Red, White and Blue aircraft sitting in background is one of the early F-84F "Thunder Birds"!

Good all around medium bomber, had the best survival rate of any bomber in WW2! This is the aircraft which I wish AH would replace the one we are using with!
« Last Edit: August 28, 2013, 02:24:05 PM by earl1937 »
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2013, 02:30:30 PM »
The problem is they're not even related to each other. We JUST had a thread where this same confusion came up.

The Douglas B-26 is just a redesignated A-26. It's not the "final version" of the B-26 at all.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2013, 02:57:27 PM »
Yup, the Douglas A-26 Invader was redesignated B-26 Invader after the Martin B-26 Marauder was retired.  The two aircraft are 100% separate designs.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2013, 03:13:45 PM »
Yup, the Douglas A-26 Invader was redesignated B-26 Invader after the Martin B-26 Marauder was retired.  The two aircraft are 100% separate designs.
:airplane: Don't recall ever saying that they weren't two different designs!   The Martin B-26 Marauder, a twin-engine light bomber, entered U.S. Army Air Forces service in 1941. Over 5,000 were built, and the aircraft were used in all theaters of operations. All Martin B-26s were declared obsolete by the United States Air Force in 1948, but few had survived even until that date as airworthy aircraft. The B-26 designation was transferred to the Douglas A-26 in June 1948 after the Martin bomber was withdrawn from service.

 The Douglas A-26 Invader, a twin-engine attack aircraft, was used operationally for the first time in 1944. The A-26 was operational in the Pacific in the later stages of the campaign against Japan. It remained in frontline service after the end of World War II, particularly as the principal offensive weapon of Tactical Air Command (TAC), when it was created in 1946 from the wartime Ninth and Twelfth Air Forces.

 In June 1948, the attack category for aircraft mission designation was officially abandoned by the U.S. Air Force. The designation of the Douglas A-26 was changed to B-26. Concurrent with this change, the Martin B-26 Marauder was withdrawn from service. The Douglas B-26s were used extensively for night interdiction missions flown by the 3rd Bombardment Group from Iwakuni, Japan, during the Korean War.

 The B-26 remained in service with the Air Force Reserve and National Guard units after being retired by TAC. It was available to return to operational service in Vietnam in 1962, and both the B-26B and B-26C versions saw action in counterinsurgency missions.

 In 1963, the U.S. Air Force initiated development of a prototype designated YB-26K in an attempt to increase the load-carrying ability and short-field performance of the B-26 airframe. In 1967, the Air Force ordered about seventy B-26s to be converted to B-26K specifications after evaluating the YB-26K's performance. Some of the Douglas B-26Ks saw service in Vietnam after being redesignated A-26As. Hope this clears up any confusion.

 
 
 
 
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #10 on: August 28, 2013, 03:28:39 PM »
The problem is they're not even related to each other. We JUST had a thread where this same confusion came up.

The Douglas B-26 is just a redesignated A-26. It's not the "final version" of the B-26 at all.
:airplane: Maybe this will clear up why I stated, "final version" of the B-26! The B-26K (A-26A) “Nimrod” was the most effective night attack aircraft used on the Ho Chi Minh Trail through Laos between June 1966 and November 1969. Flown out of Nakhon Phanom Royal Thai AFB, the success of this WWII vintage attack bomber was extremely embarrassing to the “jets can do everything” USAF leadership. For example, in December 1966 of 3,000 sorties were flown against the Ho Chi Minh Trail, Nimrods flew only 6.5% but accounted for 64% of the 195 trucks killed!

To fix this “problem” Gen. Momyer (7th AF) first insisted that the A-26As be forced to use inappropriate ordnance (“hard” bombs or rockets and napalm rather than cluster bombs) and, when that didn’t work, resorted to lying about the bombing results by lumping all 7th AF kills together and stating that the A-26 kills had happened in North Vietnam (where only jets operated). He also refused all requests to increase the number of A-26As used (there were never more than 18 in theater at any one time). Just one more example of how winning wasn’t important to the military “leadership” of the time. More ominously, despite repeated requests, the A-26As were never upgraded with “Yankee” ejection seats (of 30 airframes sent to SEA, 12 were lost and only two of those crews survived).

So, if you want to do a model of an aircraft of that era flown by really heroic crews, the Nimrod is a great candidate. Forty WWII vintage airframes were modified from 15 June 1964 to 1 April 1965 and given new serial numbers (64-17640 to 79). They had the gun turrets removed, permanent tip tanks installed, bigger props, a bigger tail, new wheels/tires, pylons, and antennas; and a new oil cooler/cowling that was added later. Originally designated B-26K, they were redesignated as the A-26A on 1 May 1966 before being sent to Thailand because the Thai government objected to having aircraft with the “offensive” bomber designation based on its territory. As you can see, the B-26K was indeed the final version of the B-26 and because LBJ didn't want to "offend" certain polical parties in the region, the designation was once again changed to "A" instead of "B".
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2013, 03:47:30 PM »
Your "This is a pic of the final version of the B-26." picture is of a Douglas B-26 Invader and that implies that the two are related as all of your text is about the completely unrelated Martin B-26 Marauder.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2013, 05:56:12 PM »
Your "This is a pic of the final version of the B-26." picture is of a Douglas B-26 Invader and that implies that the two are related as all of your text is about the completely unrelated Martin B-26 Marauder.
:airplane: OK, split a few hairs!! Let me put it this way then, "This is a pic of the final version of the B-26 series of aircraft, produced by both Martin and Douglas aircraft companies!

Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23926
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2013, 06:21:02 PM »
:airplane: OK, split a few hairs!! Let me put it this way then, "This is a pic of the final version of the B-26 series of aircraft, produced by both Martin and Douglas aircraft companies!

(Image removed from quote.)

You are trying to make a connection where really none is. There was no such "B-26 series" of airplanes. Entirely different planes with different concepts by different companies and with different designations when both went into service. The A-26 just seemingly 'inherited' the 'B-26' designation when the whole Air Force designation system was revised in 1947.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: The "One a day in Tampa Bay" Bomber
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2013, 06:26:13 PM »
:airplane: OK, split a few hairs!! Let me put it this way then, "This is a pic of the final version of the B-26 series of aircraft, produced by both Martin and Douglas aircraft companies!

(Image removed from quote.)
Once again, you seem to be combining two entirely separate series of aircraft into a single series.  The only reason the B-26 Invader was ever called the B-26 instead of just being the A-26 was because the B-26 label was freed up by the retirement of the B-26 Marauder.  If it had been called the A-25 instead of the A-26 we'd be having a discussion about the B-25 Mitchell and the B-25 Invader being unrelated.

This has caused confusion ever since.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-