Author Topic: I know we can't have nukes, but how about the next best thing?  (Read 390 times)

Offline jeffdn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
I know we can't have nukes, but how about the next best thing?
« on: November 04, 2013, 09:51:16 AM »
Introducing... the pumpkin bomb! Same shell as the "Fat Man" plutonium bomb, but filled with conventional explosives. They weighed about 10,500 lbs, 6,300 lbs of which was explosives.  :cheers: :salute

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: I know we can't have nukes, but how about the next best thing?
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2013, 09:53:54 AM »
No.  If larger bombs were to be introduced the obvious candidates would be the British 8,000 and 12,000lb high capacity bombs, but HTC has stated that 4,000lbs is the largest bomb they will put in the game.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline jeffdn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
Re: I know we can't have nukes, but how about the next best thing?
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2013, 10:08:16 AM »
No.  If larger bombs were to be introduced the obvious candidates would be the British 8,000 and 12,000lb high capacity bombs, but HTC has stated that 4,000lbs is the largest bomb they will put in the game.

I know, I just thought it was a cool thing I hadn't heard of and didn't know where else to post it  :(

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: I know we can't have nukes, but how about the next best thing?
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2013, 11:11:43 AM »
I know, I just thought it was a cool thing I hadn't heard of and didn't know where else to post it  :(
this might help...

jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett