I'm not going to go back and re-read the whole thread, but I don't think there were any accusations of intentional numbers manipulation. I think it was merely pointed out that the minimums were not met for some aircraft and maximums were exceeded for others. The process used to assign assets was mostly the issue, compounded by not keeping good control over pre-launch comms and aircraft counts.
It happens, and it will happen again. We learn, we adapt, we move on.