Change port layout

[ReVo]

No, not true. Many times ports are attacked by a relative handful, specifically because its a port. Their offensive value is severely limited, and thus they are less attractive targets for the horde, who want to take a maximum number of bases in the shortest span of time, with the least risk to any of their cartoon pilots. From what I've seen more ports are successfully defended than are taken.
 Debatable, but thats neither here nor there.

 No, you meant to say players. Dr 7, who is emphatically not a pilot, is just as valuable to HTC. The same holds true for EVERY person in the game who pays their $15 a month, regardless of what they do.

You forgot to try and poke holes in the fact that it would in no way, shape, or form, harm GVers since I haven't even included a can opener in the list of aircraft. Maybe some of the listed aircraft could turret an M18/M8 or track a tank but that's about it. I can't see a single reason not to do this.

I can on the other hand see plenty of reasons why we don't need puffy on wheels..

[Tinkles]

Shore batteries with more overlap in fields of fire

Nothing makes me more mad than to have a fleet off the shore (with up to 3 shore batteries) and not ONE of them is useful!

Personally, I think shore batteries should have an angle on their own base (for troops/anti-gv).    Or at least give them a bigger angle, or something.

[flubiu]

MW planes, dirt field. Awesome idea! Depending on the map, ports are currently way too easy to take in relation to their strategic importance.

[Arlo]

+1 OP

[DREDIOCK]

Havent gone throug all of the posts in this thread but thought I'd toss in that at least some of the manned guns and guns in general should be on the ships at the port themselves

[Ack-Ack]

Havent gone throug all of the posts in this thread but thought I'd toss in that at least some of the manned guns and guns in general should be on the ships at the port themselves

If not manned guns, at least some AI guns on the ships in port.

ack-ack