Author Topic: New B-26  (Read 4710 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
New B-26
« on: January 28, 2014, 07:22:54 AM »
 :airplane: Overall, would have to rate a A! Good job on remodel of cockpit, remake of cowlings and nose spinner! I am not sure of the "yoke" that you have placed in the a/c, don't believe I ever saw one like that in a B-26.
I couldn't tell if any changes in flight handling! Tried some power on departure stalls and as long as you are in coordinated attitude, stalls were straight ahead with no wing dropping. Same with approach to landing stalls, down and dirty with everything.
I like the addition of the RMI DG mounted on windshield. Gun sight on nose seems to be off set a little to the right, rather than directly in line with pilots position.  Airspeed and altimeter does not work at bombardier and navigator positions. I did like the gun sights though out the aircraft better than old ones.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: New B-26
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2014, 08:23:40 AM »
I am not sure of the "yoke" that you have placed in the a/c, don't believe I ever saw one like that in a B-26.
From your prior descriptions the B-26 that you have real experience with was the Douglas B-26.  The Martin B-26 was retired from US service in 1947.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: New B-26
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2014, 10:34:50 AM »
From your prior descriptions the B-26 that you have real experience with was the Douglas B-26.  The Martin B-26 was retired from US service in 1947.
:airplane: Correct, the B-26C
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14206
Re: New B-26
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2014, 10:58:39 AM »
You guys are confusing as heck.   B-26C Marauder or the Invader?   Names would help us stay on the same page.  Just saying.  

Even better, the only A-26 I ever call a B-26 is the K.  Very few misunderstandings occur that way.  
« Last Edit: January 28, 2014, 11:02:07 AM by Vraciu »
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: New B-26
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2014, 11:02:16 AM »
You guys are confusing as heck.   B-26C Marauder or the Invader?   Names would help us stay on the same page.  Just saying. 

The only A-26 I ever call a B-26 is the K.  Nobody gets confused that way. 
Martin B-26 is the Marauder.  B-26B would be a Marauder.

Douglas A-26 and B-26 is the Invader.  B-26C would be an Invader.

The two aircraft are completely unrelated to one another.  We can thank the USAF for the confusion.  They could have kept the Invader as the "A-26", but noooooo they had to go and rename it to the previously used by the, at the time of the renaming, retired Marauder "B-26".
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: New B-26
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2014, 11:24:29 AM »
From your prior descriptions the B-26 that you have real experience with was the Douglas B-26.  The Martin B-26 was retired from US service in 1947.

This is going to go on for the next ten years LOL.

I was surprised at how early the instrument panel on the B-26B looked.  I know the aircraft was designed before the U.S. entered the war.  Somehow I just expected it to look more modern.  Also, I have found the ring and bead gunsight much harder to use than the previous B-26 cockpit.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14206
Re: New B-26
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2014, 11:33:37 AM »
Martin B-26 is the Marauder.  B-26B would be a Marauder.

Douglas A-26 and B-26 is the Invader.  B-26C would be an Invader.

The two aircraft are completely unrelated to one another.  We can thank the USAF for the confusion.  They could have kept the Invader as the "A-26", but noooooo they had to go and rename it to the previously used by the, at the time of the renaming, retired Marauder "B-26".



Unless the B-26C you are referring to is a Marauder.   Or the B-26B you refer to is a post-1948 Invader.  Without the name there is just room for more confusion.  


We would all be served better to just call an Invader an A-26 unless it is the K which we can call a B-26K--which was itself re-designated A-26A.  Oy.   So calling all Invaders an A-26 and all Marauders a B-26 and just leaving it that way would help make everyone understand wtf is being said.  Otherwise, if you call an Invader a B-26 on purpose then please append it with Invader.

Face palm.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2014, 11:39:01 AM by Vraciu »
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: New B-26
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2014, 11:44:11 AM »
Very nice modeling. The new 26 is a looker.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: New B-26
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2014, 01:44:16 PM »


Unless the B-26C you are referring to is a Marauder.   Or the B-26B you refer to is a post-1948 Invader.  Without the name there is just room for more confusion.  


We would all be served better to just call an Invader an A-26 unless it is the K which we can call a B-26K--which was itself re-designated A-26A.  Oy.   So calling all Invaders an A-26 and all Marauders a B-26 and just leaving it that way would help make everyone understand wtf is being said.  Otherwise, if you call an Invader a B-26 on purpose then please append it with Invader.

Face palm.
:airplane: Sorry guys, didn't mean to confuse anyone. The Douglas B-26 "invader" was actually first designed in 1942, but because of a number of things, non were ordered until 1944 and because of prior contracts, non really flew in WW2, although I found a web site which said they did. They first came into the fore front of bombers during the Korean conflict and was the last aircraft to drop a bomb in that conflict 30 minutes prior to signing of peace agreement with the North.
This aircraft was actually designed to take the place of the A-20 Havoc in the USAF inventory and several varients were produced over the life of the aircraft. The aircraft designation was changed by the USAF in 48 I think.

This a "C" model in flight

this is the latest version of the "Invader" series, which was used though out the Vietnam war, mainly hitting Ho Ci Men trail, both during day light and night.

The "C" and "K" office!
While the Martin and Douglas aircraft both played an important part in military operations, there is no question, but that the "K" model was the most effective medium bomber as far as "heavy" iron was concerned!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: New B-26
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2014, 01:51:37 PM »
Martin B-26 is the Marauder.  B-26B would be a Marauder.

Douglas A-26 and B-26 is the Invader.  B-26C would be an Invader.

The two aircraft are completely unrelated to one another.  We can thank the USAF for the confusion.  They could have kept the Invader as the "A-26", but noooooo they had to go and rename it to the previously used by the, at the time of the renaming, retired Marauder "B-26".
:airplane: One of the reasons for the confusion is this. When the USAF wanted to fly the Invader out of Thailand, they would not agree to allowing bombers to fly from their country, so the USAF changed the designation from B-26 back to A-26. Same aircraft, same attack mission profile and never understood why the Thai's objected to that designation.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15731
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: New B-26
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2014, 09:17:50 PM »
This a "C" model in flight

A gorgeous plane.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15731
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: New B-26
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2014, 09:18:24 PM »
I with the B-26 in AH had the ability to take torpedoes so that we could use it that way in Midway special events.

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: New B-26
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2014, 05:21:21 AM »
I with the B-26 in AH had the ability to take torpedoes so that we could use it that way in Midway special events.
:airplane: I am very pleased with the re-design of our B-26, just wish they had put a decent looking "Yoke" in it. Guns seem to be more effective or maybe my new glasses, but at any rate, seem to be getting better results when firing them at cons!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: New B-26
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2014, 06:03:31 AM »
is the tail gun destructible now?

Offline palef

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2212
Re: New B-26
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2014, 03:01:01 PM »
It's so cooool! I upped a formation for a short flight, delivered ords, got shot down but killed my attacker (I panicked and forgot how to switch planes - doh!). Much more immersive now.
Retired