Two posts above the one I am quoting , I say there are others. Now as for your statement there hot rod. Do you know anything about Demore v Kim ? You might want to do a little research before you accuse me of not knowing what I talk about. Also a little research into the Patriot Act might clear up some of your misconceptions about who is protected by the Constitution. It is usually wise to know what you speak of before calling others ignorant. Bottom line is semp the Constitution is unclear about the subject. My personal opinion is that the Constitution protects God given rights. Anyone that is in a place where it is the supreme law of the land should enjoy that protection. That is my opinion , USSC holds a different one.
hilbly dove into the ground and started to dig.
demore v kim is about a legal resident committing a crime and being deported. however up until he was deported (as it should have been for anybody that commits a crime) his constitutional rights were protected. including his right to a trial, right to an attorney... his constitutional rights were protected all the way to the supreme court.
so please do point out which of kim's rights were not protected under the constitution?
your personal opinion that the constitution protects
god given rights is just that, your personal opinion. you are entitled to it under the constitution. just like under the constitution I am entitled to tell you that you are wrong.
semp