Author Topic: Next new plane  (Read 6484 times)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2014, 04:17:14 PM »
Top of my list ...Cac Boomerang and the Dewoitine D-520

Yeah, we know.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2014, 04:19:44 PM »
No new planes. Focus on updating the older models.

Can't argue with that. Well .... won't.

P.S. More active accounts instead of 'I'm cancelling mine til things get "better.' Would go further toward helping HTC accomplish our wishes.

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2014, 04:20:31 PM »

beaufighter
Baltimore ( Martin 187 )
Martin 167 Maryland
Pe-8
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15719
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2014, 04:34:36 PM »
Wouldn't the MiG-3 be a better fit than the Yak-1? Even in 1942?
Japanese bombers are always prevalent, glad we have what we do for scenarios.
Agreed that the Tu-2 is not an acceptable stand in for the Pe-2, thought the properly equipped B25 is.
The Beaufighter has much the same punch as the Mossi albeit being slower.  Oh, and able to carry a torpedo as well.  :aok  In PTO and MTO scenarios it will do well enough. Though, for MA use the ENY of the Mossi Mk IV will need to be adjusted (it is too high on the scale).


They were mostly contemporaneous, but there weren't nearly as many MiG-3's as Yak-1's (3200 vs. 8700).  Also, the MiG-3 has such weak armament that it wouldn't be good as a main fighter for the Soviet side in a scenario.  The Yak-1 would be more useful.

I'm not sure if the B-25 is a good stand in for the Pe-2 depending on how much of a dive-bomber the Pe-2 really was.  I'm not knowledgeable about how Pe-2's did their bombing in real life.

I don't think that any of these planes would see huge use in the MA, but the MA already has almost all of the late-war planes.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2014, 04:34:39 PM »
Yeah, we know.
It is quite amusing how he talks down everybody else's early or mid war suggestions as useless hangar queens, but then constantly pushes his preferred early war stuff as though they wouldn't be hangar queens.  The willful hypocrisy is interesting to observe.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline -27th-

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2014, 04:42:08 PM »
1. A26 Invader
2. Me 262 w/50mm cannon
3. Armored train
4. Wellington
5. Beaufighter

 :salute
27th

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2014, 04:44:15 PM »
It is quite amusing how he talks down everybody else's early or mid war suggestions as useless hangar queens, but then constantly pushes his preferred early war stuff as though they wouldn't be hangar queens.  The willful hypocrisy is interesting to observe.

Meg is a classic case study of inability to think outside his own brick.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #22 on: March 06, 2014, 04:51:26 PM »

2. Me 262 w/50mm cannon

27th

Never saw any service beyond the two Me 262 A-1a/U4 prototypes.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline lunatic1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #23 on: March 06, 2014, 04:52:25 PM »
We should get the 410
do you mean a better-410--have you tried bribing them with pies??????????????
« Last Edit: March 06, 2014, 04:58:10 PM by lunatic1 »
C.O. of the 173rd Guardian Angels---Don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes...Major devereux(The Battle Of Wake Island-1941.
R.I.P.49GRIN/GRIN-R.I.P. WWHISKEY R.I.P WIZZY R.I.P.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7283
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #24 on: March 06, 2014, 05:10:05 PM »
Beaufighter, KI44, D520, Mig3.

Offline lunatic1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #25 on: March 06, 2014, 05:13:31 PM »
beaufighter--updated p-51 with cannons.some other british tank. :joystick:
C.O. of the 173rd Guardian Angels---Don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes...Major devereux(The Battle Of Wake Island-1941.
R.I.P.49GRIN/GRIN-R.I.P. WWHISKEY R.I.P WIZZY R.I.P.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #26 on: March 06, 2014, 05:18:42 PM »
Wouldn't the MiG-3 be a better fit than the Yak-1? Even in 1942?
Yak-1 had higher production numbers and was a better fighter. The MiG-3 was significantly worse in every respect except for speed and looks.
MiG-3 would still be super cool though

I don't understand the attitude of "we almost have kind of a workable representation of one of the largest and most important air forces in the war, lets go back to focusing on American planes or completely irrelevant ones"
« Last Edit: March 06, 2014, 05:20:36 PM by Motherland »

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #27 on: March 06, 2014, 05:30:15 PM »
Tante JU-52, both as troop carrier,ordnance and bomber !

Axis does not have a troop/ord carrier flying.


My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #28 on: March 06, 2014, 05:38:55 PM »
Axis does not have a troop/ord carrier flying.
(Image removed from quote.)

Up a C-47 with the Japanese skin.  :D

As for hole fillers:

Ki-44
Ki-45 (seriously, we have 110s taking its place in PTO scenarios/FSOs. :P)
Ki-100
J2M
D4Y
B6N

TBD
SB2C
F6F-3
F4F-3

Beaufighter
Swordfish
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Next new plane
« Reply #29 on: March 06, 2014, 05:43:47 PM »
Up a C-47 with the Japanese skin.  :D

As for hole fillers:

Ki-44
Ki-45 (seriously, we have 110s taking its place in PTO scenarios/FSOs. :P)
Ki-100
J2M
D4Y
B6N

TBD
SB2C
F6F-3
F4F-3

Beaufighter
Swordfish

Gotta appreciate your PTO fixation (upping the Japanese set in power and flexibility while adding allied planes that balance more in the early/mid war should promote more PTO events from early to late time frames). However, I don't think everyone else will.