Author Topic: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!  (Read 3734 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2014, 01:46:17 PM »
Yep.  Early on was the "Bamboo Bomber" or Cessna T-50, later it was a Cessna 310.
:airplane: The T-50 and the Cessna 310 were two completely different aircraft. The T-50 had a Jacobs R-755-9, 7 cylinder, radial engine and could cruise at 175MPH. Air Force designate UC-78 and also AT-17 depending on what its use.


The Cessna 310D was the original 310 series and had two Continental 0-470-B, Opposed engines and cruise speed was 210MPH.


One of the most popular twin engine aircraft in general aviation was the 310K, which could cruise at 220MPH and had slanted flared tip tanks.


I had 1.5 hours in T-50, test hop after annual and re-furbished by Hill aircraft and leasing, Atlanta, Ga. I have several hundred hours in the 310 aircraft, as most flight schools around Atlanta used them for multi-engine training.

The T-50 was owned by a Lockheed Test pilot and later was destroyed in a wind storm at McCollum airport in Kennasaw, Ga, I think it was 1983.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline BuckShot

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2014, 06:26:24 PM »
Awesome video!

Any idea why Beech went with that rudder config?
Game handle: HellBuck

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2014, 04:19:10 PM »
Awesome video!

Any idea why Beech went with that rudder config?
:airplane: I heard that question asked at a dinner one night in Atlanta, honoring Mrs Beech! When the aircraft was designed back in the day, most hangars back then where not high enough to accommodate The "Twin Beech" with a nose wheel, which were in the Beech aircraft companies plans and they later came out with a model called the "Super H Twin Beech", and a single rudder and vertical stab would extend to high for the hangars of that day and time. Not sure if that was correct, but what I heard.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2014, 05:06:46 PM »
Not sure of the why, but having twin rudders keeps them in the prop blast with increases their effectiveness.
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline BuckShot

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2014, 06:29:42 PM »
Makes sense. Thanks Columbo.

"and ahh..one more thing sir." I watch Columbo every weekend.
Game handle: HellBuck

Offline BuckShot

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2014, 06:31:06 PM »
:airplane: I heard that question asked at a dinner one night in Atlanta, honoring Mrs Beech! When the aircraft was designed back in the day, most hangars back then where not high enough to accommodate The "Twin Beech" with a nose wheel, which were in the Beech aircraft companies plans and they later came out with a model called the "Super H Twin Beech", and a single rudder and vertical stab would extend to high for the hangars of that day and time. Not sure if that was correct, but what I heard.

Thanks Earl

~S~ Buck
Game handle: HellBuck

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2014, 06:31:25 PM »
Not sure of the why, but having twin rudders keeps them in the prop blast with increases their effectiveness.
:airplane: Just thinking out loud, but with the twin rudders, off set from the center line of the fuselage would lower the VMC because of the leverage and effectiveness. I would also suspect that with twin rudders, it would be a little faster. I recall a mod call Beech "Trade wind" I think it was called, it had a single veridical stab and rudder.

This was not a particular good conversion, I think if I remember right, only 14 were built.

Does anyone see the similarly between this "Tradewind" and the Beechcraft "Queenair" which was so popular during the 50's?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2014, 06:34:36 PM by earl1937 »
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Nath[BDP]

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2014, 11:21:11 PM »
Gnar gnar
++Blue Knights++
vocalist of the year


Offline Hetzer7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2014, 03:08:14 PM »
Heres 555WS, a Beech 18 I worked on for years, now under new ownership:


Offline LilMak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1344
Re: Aerobatics in Beech 18. Yikes!
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2014, 11:53:38 AM »
Saw him fly Saturday. Flew about 50ft over my camping spot @ Sun-N-Fun with smoke on. It was IMC for about a minute. Sadly I didn't have my camera. Battery was dead.
"When caught by the enemy in large force the best policy is to fight like hell until you can decide what to do next."
~Hub Zemke
P-47 pilot 56th Fighter Group.