Author Topic: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200  (Read 1386 times)

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« on: March 31, 2014, 08:30:14 AM »
.50s seem like a funny sort of gun package that'll ping some poor devil to death out to 800 but will let you down in snapshots in the knife-fight when it's really important. Twice yesterday in the Pony I had D9s fly through my fire at close range multiple times during hard fights.
So I'm thinking of pulling the convergence in from 275 yards to 200, maybe closer. Think it'll help?
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2014, 08:39:42 AM »
Take a look at Batfinks sig :aok
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline ImADot

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2014, 08:48:18 AM »
So your convergence is 275 and you're trying to hit guys from 800 out? No wonder you have problems. Pick a convergence, shoot at that convergence and you'll have more success.
My Current Rig:
GigaByte GA-X99-UD4 Mobo w/ 16Gb RAM
Intel i7 5820k, Win7 64-bit
NVidia GTX 970 4Gb ACX 2.0
Track IR, CH Fighterstick, CH Pro Throttle, CH Pro Pedals

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2014, 08:57:38 AM »
So your convergence is 275 and you're trying to hit guys from 800 out? No wonder you have problems. Pick a convergence, shoot at that convergence and you'll have more success.
*facepalm* Thank you for replying without actually reading the post.
No. My convergence is 275 and I SUCCEED at pinging extending planes to death as far as 800. But aircraft are flying through my fire at close range and surviving in close range knife fights. So I'm thinking of 200. I'm just wondering if that is beyond the point of diminishing returns.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline McShark

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2014, 10:04:01 AM »
*facepalm* Thank you for replying without actually reading the post.
No. My convergence is 275 and I SUCCEED at pinging extending planes to death as far as 800. But aircraft are flying through my fire at close range and surviving in close range knife fights. So I'm thinking of 200. I'm just wondering if that is beyond the point of diminishing returns.

But still you shoot, in both cases, out of range considering your convergence. If you shoot at cons 800 with your 275 convergence you don't use their potential. Same in a knife fight when the bandit is 150 yds in front, your convergence is still way off.

Where do you WANT to shoot at a bandit?
Prefer white knuckle knife fights? Prefer to keep your E up and hit in BnZ style?
Put your convergence accordingly. That's exactly what Batfinks ( mechanic ) sig states.

You might considering reading an answer before thrashing away at anyone trying to help !  :old:
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 10:05:52 AM by McShark »
The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence. -Charles Bukowski
Gleams the blade,Shines my Honor
Tour 19 - 163 McShark
Tour 163 -      Barkhorn

Offline Hoplite

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2014, 10:10:53 AM »
.50s seem like a funny sort of gun package that'll ping some poor devil to death out to 800 but will let you down in snapshots in the knife-fight when it's really important. Twice yesterday in the Pony I had D9s fly through my fire at close range multiple times during hard fights.
So I'm thinking of pulling the convergence in from 275 yards to 200, maybe closer. Think it'll help?


I've tried it. 

My experience is that instant leathality with .50s in four or six gun packages is difficult at best.  With four gun package .50s I'm inclined to say nearly impossible short of a cockpit shot (I'm sure more than a few P38 pilots will take exception to this statement...).  Eight gun packaged P47s are another matter entirely, of course, but even they are not assured of a quick kill or even crippling damage from a snapshot.

FYI - I find dual 30mm give off a soft, warm glow when they hit and make just about anything go boom.  I like that.  When I manage to hit what I'm aiming at, that is.  :uhoh


Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8054
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2014, 10:12:18 AM »
The shorter you bring it in, the more extreme the 'X' becomes once you're shooting past convergence.  The way I tend to look at it is whatever my convergence is set to, my reasonable range is about double that.  If you were to draw the bullets as a straight line, and your convergence is 300, your bullets would be the same width as they are at 0 out at 600, still a reasonable concentration of fire to put both streams on one plane or one bomber wing.  Now obviously that's not exactly true, because of dispersion, at 600 the rounds spread quite a bit.  I still find I can do damage to a non-maneuvering opponent at that range.

If you start bringing it in closer, say to 200, now your bullets are the same width they are at 0 at 400 yards, and you're only going to be able to put part of the fire from one bank of guns on the guy at 600.  The X is too fat, and it moves the second bank of guns' fire off too far to the side.

Now, looking at ranges closer to either side of convergence, with my convergence at 300 I generally find hitting at about 200-400 gives me an excellent volume of fire on the part I'm aiming at, little different from hitting him right at 300.  That gives me basically a 200 yard band where my damage is excellent.  If I move my convergence in to 200, my bullets are the same width at around 275 and 125, which means I've only got about 150 yards putting the same volume of fire in the same area.

TL;DR:  If you shorten it up too much, IMO it shortens up the range where you can get acceptable volume of fire on a plane, and shortens the range you can ping for damage, not just to make noise.

I like the versatility 300 gives me, even though I do most of my shooting inside 300.  I don't think the gain of shortening it up outweighs the loss in versatility.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2014, 10:21:50 AM »
Prefer white knuckle knife fights? Prefer to keep your E up and hit in BnZ style?
The answer to this question is "Yes".
But I rarely shoot outside of D400 in any case.
And failing to get a kill on the snap in a knife-fight when you have to knife-fight is often fatal.
So I'm pretty much convinced I need to pull them in, but I have qualms, this does go against the standard advice you hear about .50s...
I did my first 262 sortie in ages this weekend and needing only one ping at very close range seemed easy compared to how gunnery often is in the Pony.

I made a passing statement about .50s having the ability to kill poor saps out to 800 but often failing to do what it needs to do in fights in close, intended as a bit of irony. It was just a lead in to my question about whether or not setting it to 200 will be more helpful than harmful, not something that should be misread to derail the whole thread.  :bhead
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 10:26:59 AM by BnZs »
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2014, 10:24:42 AM »

FYI - I find dual 30mm give off a soft, warm glow when they hit and make just about anything go boom.  I like that.  When I manage to hit what I'm aiming at, that is.  :uhoh



Had a mooch about in a Zerstorer last week, I can attest to the twin 30mm's, but it was less of a soft warm glow, more of a rending flash and instant dismemberment :joystick:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2014, 10:33:37 AM »
I hope 200 works for you.  I have experimented with setting all 8 guns at 200 and it certainly lethal, but found in all but a few of my engagements, the distance was a a bit more.  It's probably just the way I fly (not that good) and the AC I fly.

Overall, I want a convergence that gives me a lethal shot within 400 yards and it seems 250 yards works best FOR ME. 

Good luck to you with finding the sweet spot.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Hoplite

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2014, 10:43:02 AM »
Had a mooch about in a Zerstorer last week, I can attest to the twin 30mm's, but it was less of a soft warm glow, more of a rending flash and instant dismemberment :joystick:

True. 

I should have clarified that the "warm glow" is felt internally as you watch the "rending flash and instant dismemberment" of your victim's plane.   :D

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2014, 10:52:37 AM »
True.  

I should have clarified that the "warm glow" is felt internally as you watch the "rending flash and instant dismemberment" of your victim's plane.   :D

Oh Yeah. Felt that too :D

Especially when I saw the F4U, completely oblivious to my prescence, coming to a shuddering stall 150 ft off my nose :banana:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2014, 01:56:28 PM »
With four gun package .50s I'm inclined to say nearly impossible short of a cockpit shot (I'm sure more than a few P38 pilots will take exception to this statement...). 

Sure we will take exception to your statement because it's incorrect.  The reason why some have troubles doing any damage with the lighter .50 caliber gun packages is because they are not hitting at the convergence point, which will mitigate a lot of damage since there is no concentrated fire at a single point.  We P-38 drivers are lucky in that we don't have those convergence issues and the full fury of the .50s can be unleashed to devastating effect.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Hoplite

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 427
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2014, 01:58:58 PM »
Sure we will take exception to your statement because it's incorrect.  The reason why some have troubles doing any damage with the lighter .50 caliber gun packages is because they are not hitting at the convergence point, which will mitigate a lot of damage since there is no concentrated fire at a single point.  We P-38 drivers are lucky in that we don't have those convergence issues and the full fury of the .50s can be unleashed to devastating effect.

ack-ack

Which is exactly why I stated you guys would.  I should have stated more clearly why P38 drivers would take exception i.e. because of the nose mounting / concentration of fire.

Offline Skyyr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1765
Re: Thinking of pulling my .50s convergence down to 200
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2014, 02:46:11 PM »
PM sent
Skyyr

Tours:
166 - 190
198 - 204
218 - 220
286 - 287
290 - ---

nrshida: "I almost beat Skyyr after he took a 6 year break!"
A few moments later...

vs Shane: 29-7

"Some men just want to watch the world burn."