The mottling on the fuselage is visibly much less sharp on the edges in the photo (there's actually no sharpness, it's mottling, more or less random splotches with a spray gun). It's also two-tone like on Luftwaffe aircraft (this is most easily observed on the vertical stabilizer). Also the font isn't all that great of an approximation, the eight in particular is not very similar to the eight on the fuselage of the photographed aircraft.
Also, your wing marking are incorrect, they are the Fasces of the RA instead of the ANR, and they are clearly visible to be white on the upper wing surface in the photograph.
The photography also shows red ones emblazoned on the fairings of the landing gear
In general the proportions of all of your markings appear to be off, and the solid cover of the upper surfaces appears to come further down the fuselage than you have it.
You also have white wing caps for which there is no evidence in the photograph or profile.
There is almost certainly a two-tone splinter pattern on the upper fuselage and horizontal stabilizers like on Luftwaffe aircraft (the ISR was essentially a puppet state of Nazi Germany and the ANR likewise closely related to the Luftwaffe), of which there is also evidence of in the photograph.
You can also see in the photograph that the markings are done in a glossier paint than the rest of the aircraft. Thanks to the spec mapping system, this can be reflected in the skin, and honestly really should be.
The photo also allows you to reflect on things such as relative panel line depth, which was not the same across the aircraft as it is often portrayed in AH skins, and the deformation of control surfaces, which is often overdone. Fixing these issues is a good way to make your skin stand out.
Nice start but needs much more research and attention to detail. You have a nice large photograph which shows the plane from a good angle to get a lot of reference from, you should suck all of the information you can out of it.
