Author Topic: Fuel Burn in combustion engines  (Read 1733 times)

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« on: April 18, 2014, 09:40:29 AM »
 :airplane: I am not going to go into a lot of questions about this, but, in an engine, with dual mags, which mag fires spark plug nearest the exhaust valve?

Along that same line of questions, why is it normal for the L and R mags to have a difference in RPM drop?

When using an exhaust temperature gauge for maximum fuel range, how do you arrive at that peak performance?

Why is it important to know where your fuel pickups are located in your fuel cells?

Who or what organization, sets the fuel grade of different grades of gasoline for aircraft?
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5938
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2014, 11:01:33 AM »
Hi Earl,

Really enjoy your posts, sir.  And this one is about one of my favorite topics: Internal Combustion!   :x


I am not going to go into a lot of questions about this, but, in an engine, with dual mags, which mag fires spark plug nearest the exhaust valve?
The twin-spark engines I've seen inside (old Maserati in-line six, modern Lycoming IO-360) have one intake and one exhaust valve, with the two spark plugs equidistant from the valves.  With two valves and two sparks, they're ranged around the periphery of the head at ninety-degree intervals:  valve-spark-valve-spark.

Along that same line of questions, why is it normal for the L and R mags to have a difference in RPM drop?
Depends on how the intake mix swirls into the cylinder while the piston descends, and how close the currently active spark plug is to that swirl.  In many engines with two-valve heads, the intake charge flows into the cylinder in a sort of corkscrew path.

When using an exhaust temperature gauge for maximum fuel range, how do you arrive at that peak performance?
Lean the mix slowly until you see the highest temperature (most complete combustion)... and then enrich the mix "a skosh" to keep the engine a little cooler.

Why is it important to know where your fuel pickups are located in your fuel cells?
So you can know what attitude and/or G-load might cause fuel starvation, I suppose?

Who or what organization, sets the fuel grade of different grades of gasoline for aircraft?
Depends on which country you fly within.   :neener:

« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 11:27:54 AM by Bino »


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9504
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2014, 12:05:26 PM »
When using an exhaust temperature gauge for maximum fuel range, how do you arrive at that peak performance?
Lean the mix slowly until you see the highest temperature (most complete combustion)... and then enrich the mix "a skosh" to keep the engine a little cooler.


Seems to me the modern trend is to go lean of peak, if the motor's suitable.

- oldman

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2014, 07:42:31 AM »

Seems to me the modern trend is to go lean of peak, if the motor's suitable.

- oldman
:airplane: That seems to be the latest "guess-ta-mutt"! I generally let the total time on engine or since top overhaul dictate just how lean I would run the engine. The higher the engine time, the less I would push the peak lean!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2014, 08:09:52 AM »
Hi Earl,

Really enjoy your posts, sir.  And this one is about one of my favorite topics: Internal Combustion!   :x


I am not going to go into a lot of questions about this, but, in an engine, with dual mags, which mag fires spark plug nearest the exhaust valve?
The twin-spark engines I've seen inside (old Maserati in-line six, modern Lycoming IO-360) have one intake and one exhaust valve, with the two spark plugs equidistant from the valves.  With two valves and two sparks, they're ranged around the periphery of the head at ninety-degree intervals:  valve-spark-valve-spark.

Along that same line of questions, why is it normal for the L and R mags to have a difference in RPM drop?
Depends on how the intake mix swirls into the cylinder while the piston descends, and how close the currently active spark plug is to that swirl.  In many engines with two-valve heads, the intake charge flows into the cylinder in a sort of corkscrew path.

When using an exhaust temperature gauge for maximum fuel range, how do you arrive at that peak performance?
Lean the mix slowly until you see the highest temperature (most complete combustion)... and then enrich the mix "a skosh" to keep the engine a little cooler.

Why is it important to know where your fuel pickups are located in your fuel cells?
So you can know what attitude and/or G-load might cause fuel starvation, I suppose?

Who or what organization, sets the fuel grade of different grades of gasoline for aircraft?
Depends on which country you fly within.   :neener:


:airplane: YOu certainly know your air cooled combustion engines! You are correct, 90 degree placement is correct,  with one exception: the R-3350 compound engine on the B-29, 1049 Super G Connies and some others. The "compounding effect" of this engine required a more even burn at the exhaust valve area than normal, hence both plugs are closer to the exhaust port than normal.

In some aircraft, such as the B-25, the fuel p/u's were placed to forward in the fuel cells, hence about 60 total galleons were not usuable until the guys in the SWPA of combat discovered that by lowering 10 degrees of flaps, they could burn an additional 40 galleon of fuel, there fore increasing their range by about 35 to 40 min's.


ASTM D1405 / D1405M - 08(2013) Standard Test Method for Estimation of Net Heat of Combustion of Aviation Fuels. Many countries and companies used this method to determine the octance of fuel and is usually approved by the Commerce dept.
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2014, 01:58:54 PM »

Seems to me the modern trend is to go lean of peak, if the motor's suitable.

- oldman

That is correct if you have the instrumentation and hardware set up for it it is the way to run. I just retired my engine on my Cirrus six months ago with 3200 hours on it and it was run lean of peak 99% of the time except for takeoff.

That is a $45,000 data point


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline earl1937

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2014, 03:04:35 PM »
That is correct if you have the instrumentation and hardware set up for it it is the way to run. I just retired my engine on my Cirrus six months ago with 3200 hours on it and it was run lean of peak 99% of the time except for takeoff.

That is a $45,000 data point
:salute just goes to show what can be done when the operator is competent in managing his power plants! <S> to you sir!
Blue Skies and wind at my back and wish that for all!!!

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2014, 02:55:09 PM »
That is correct if you have the instrumentation and hardware set up for it it is the way to run. I just retired my engine on my Cirrus six months ago with 3200 hours on it and it was run lean of peak 99% of the time except for takeoff.

That is a $45,000 data point

How many degrees LoP did you run?  There's about 125 degrees between peak and rough running due to lack of fuel in the Bonanza and the IO-550 in it.

I'm a little light on documentation but the Auricle makes life pretty easy with best power and best economy bugs.

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6815
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2014, 05:17:39 PM »
That is correct if you have the instrumentation and hardware set up for it it is the way to run. I just retired my engine on my Cirrus six months ago with 3200 hours on it and it was run lean of peak 99% of the time except for takeoff.

That is a $45,000 data point
How high above recommended TBO is 3200 hours?



All gave some, Some gave all

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9504
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2014, 07:20:06 PM »
How high above recommended TBO is 3200 hours?


I'm going to guess 1200 hours.

Do I win a prize?  (*tm Dipsy)

- oldman

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6815
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #10 on: April 26, 2014, 11:13:08 AM »

I'm going to guess 1200 hours.

Do I win a prize?  (*tm Dipsy)

- oldman
That would be some seriously nice engine management/care. 



All gave some, Some gave all

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #11 on: April 26, 2014, 12:32:45 PM »
I got 2700 hours out of my first O-470 in the 182, TBO of 1200.  It was strong, running fine.  I changed it out when I found the cam lobes/lifters flaking metal off.   It wasn't really all that bad, you couldn't read part numbers or anything,  :devil but it was making metal.
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6815
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #12 on: April 26, 2014, 12:35:33 PM »
Not to shabby!  :aok



All gave some, Some gave all

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #13 on: April 26, 2014, 06:19:44 PM »
How many degrees LoP did you run?  There's about 125 degrees between peak and rough running due to lack of fuel in the Bonanza and the IO-550 in it.

I'm a little light on documentation but the Auricle makes life pretty easy with best power and best economy bugs.




It depends on the day what you can get, but generally high power LOP around 75% and at least 100 LOP.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: Fuel Burn in combustion engines
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2014, 06:36:33 PM »
Can you help me a little more with how to use this chart?
« Last Edit: April 26, 2014, 06:40:55 PM by Golfer »