Author Topic: P47N Climb Rate?  (Read 3207 times)

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
P47N Climb Rate?
« on: April 20, 2014, 10:58:58 AM »
Am I reading this letter wrong?  The N is a terrible climber in AH but in this letter it out climbs the D with both planes in WEP and combat load( which I think is full fuel and full ammo load).  The AH shows the N to be a slower climber in WEP than the D in WEP.

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-47/comp-p47dmn.jpg

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2014, 12:15:07 PM »
Which D model would be the question that jumps out at me.  Which prop was it using?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2014, 02:36:13 PM »
Note the weights in the letter vs the AH charts. Combat load is likely 267 rpg.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2014, 06:55:55 PM »
That document also reflects combat power.....
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2014, 06:05:27 AM »
The AH shows the N to be a slower climber in WEP than the D in WEP.
In the game the N outclimbs the D given the same loadout, on WEP. Note that "same" means absolute gallons of fuel, not percentage.

The N is heavier and has the same power on MIL as the D's, so it is the worst climber on MIL. It has a super crazy WEP though which makes up for the extra weight when engaged. The M model has about the same weight as the other D25/40 but the WEP power of the N.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2014, 06:27:43 AM »
That document also reflects combat power.....

It says WEP.  Is WEP the same as combat power?

Anyone know how they define combat weight?

There is no match with AH using 100% fuel and the smaller eight 50s load-out.  The AH weight is higher than the letter listed combat weight.

The date of the letter suggest a late war D model but of course that is a guess.

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2014, 08:32:46 AM »
Why assume full fuel? The weights are given in the letter.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2014, 03:46:59 PM »
Why assume full fuel? The weights are given in the letter.

I thought I had read somewhere that combat weight(as listed in the letter) is defined as full fuel and full ammo for a fighter.  I then compared the weight in the letter to the E6b.

This afternoon I will attempt to find a combo to match weights in the letter to AH.

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2014, 03:59:06 AM »
The N also carries a vast amount of fuel compared to other Jugs. Thus any simple climb rate comparison with both planes at 50 percent load out will not accurately reflect the N's capacities. Comparing the planes at fuel loads that give equivalent time in the air is more appropriate.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2014, 06:23:18 AM »
The N also carries a vast amount of fuel compared to other Jugs. Thus any simple climb rate comparison with both planes at 50 percent load out will not accurately reflect the N's capacities. Comparing the planes at fuel loads that give equivalent time in the air is more appropriate.

Best I can tell is the acceptance performance test were all done with 200 gallons of fuel with simulated ammo loads. 

The letter's test were done at an undefined Combat weight and were more than likely performed at a base somewhere using stopwatches and on board standard instruments.   In others words there is nothing in the letter we can hang our hat on as I have found out.   

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2014, 01:28:55 PM »
The 47M is a beast. A BEAST!
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Zoney

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6503
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2014, 01:37:34 PM »
The 47M is a beast. A BEAST!

Yes it is, it takes me quite awhile to chase them down in my TA152 sometimes.  :devil
Wag more, bark less.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2014, 06:20:09 AM »
This quote came from the P38J performance test about combat weight.  300 gallons is 3/4 fuel.

"   High speed and climb performance have been completed on this airplane at a take-off weight of 16,597 lb. This loading corresponds to athe average P-38 combat weight with full oil, 300 gallons of fuel and specified armament and ammunition. "

Then I found this on a 70"hg P38J test.

"All tests were flown at a gross weight at take-off of 17,363 lbs. with the c.g. at 26.72% MAC, gear up, and 23.86% MAC gear down. This weight which corresponds to the combat weight of the airplane included 416 gallons of gasoline, full oil, 457.5 lbs. of ballst for 1500 rounds of .50 caliber ammunition, and 200 lbs. for the pilot. "

Note no mention of the canon weight added.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2014, 06:38:34 AM by Randy1 »

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2014, 03:08:29 PM »
Since the P-38 does not have a 1500 round load the ballast is likely for both gun and cannon ammo.

The AH J model with full fuel and 200 rounds per gun weighs 17,328 lbs vs the 17,363 lbs quoted.

The early J models had 4 fuel tanks for 306 total gallons. Our J, and the L model, has 6 tanks with
416 gallons capacity.  If the first test was an early model J it would have 300 gallons for a full combat load.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2014, 03:51:26 PM by FLS »

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: P47N Climb Rate?
« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2014, 04:28:50 PM »
Thanks FLS.