1. A company owes me an explanation whenever I ask for one. If the issue is serious and a group of customers have the same issue yea they do.
2. If I have a suggestion, the company should implement it.If I have a suggestion the company should at least hear it.
3. A company should let me be an annoying jerk if I want to be.To an extent maybe.
4. My $x means 1-3 are my rights.
5. If I quit, that will show them.If 1-3 are not your "rights" than you have no other option than to vote with your wallet.
6. The 1st Amendment means that I have the right of freedom of speech in a private forum.I haven't heard that one lately.
7. If a company doesn't give me reasons for something, it means that they haven't thoroughly evaluated it.Maybe, how can we know any different if they don't at least try and inform their paying customers.
1. No. A company can choose to do so or not, but they don't owe it to you or to a group of 15 out of out thousands of customers.
2. You are conflating "hearing it", "implementing it," and "upper management discussing it with me". They are all vastly different things. The first usually happens. The other two usually do not (unless the idea is a very good one that they agree with).
3. No. Annoying jerks are often a detriment to business.
5. Yes. That is in fact mostly how the world works and is (but only in aggregate) effective.
7. A company almost always has reasons for things. To assume otherwise is to be usually wrong.
What a lot of people here would benefit from is a reading of "How to Win Friends and Influence People," by Carnegie. It is a great book. A lot of people here employ techniques that are best suited to minimizing their ability to influence people and to get things done.