Cease Fire

[Nathan60]

Look at this way.... The Bishops don't have to go far to find a good fight.....

That's the way knights and I'm sure rooks look at it when, they are getting piled. I say lets pile on the bish until they learn to enjoy finding fights all over the place. Something for everyone when getting piled on, base defense furball, gv action, useful bomber missions to drop ords, and barracks, only reason to whine about it is if you only enjoy steam rolling fields and I guess in that case your SoL

[SilverZ06]

Just so we are on the same page... You are asking for a cease fire in a combat simulator? 

[RotBaron]

 

needed some laughs this eve, ty

[1Cane]

 

Just so we are on the same page... You are asking for a cease fire in a combat simulator?  

the ceasefire would be stopping of hostilities and moving to the next map and no perk points awar

[Someguy63]

As you first stated only one country needs to be below 40% for a win and a map change. So now, we don't have to worry about even touching the other?

This could make map winning a bit easy and obviously will change the current system.

Now, for example, the Bish could ignore the Knights who are putting up fierce defense, and attack the Rooks who are defending little to none. It has happened many times where a country has lost 60% of their bases to the other countries, as this can't be all too hard, specifically  on small maps.

[Yankee67]

God I wish I was home with my gaming laptop.  Figures, I'm on the road in a hotel and missing all the fun.

[Tinkles]

Let the crook/gnats pile on.  If they have to double team bish -- so be it.  It's the highest compliment they can give -- to have to double team us to be happy.  Sad though.  Gnats used to be smart instead of being stooges to the crooks...who turn on them every time they want to get bases -- and like an abused spouse -- nits keep on going back with open arms after being turned on.  But that 's no biggie.  If two sides have to team up against the other let it happen.  

I'd rather have it that crooks & gnats double team us...it speaks volumes for what side is the real power in the game.

If players are offended by base taking squads and base taking mission planners then give me your address so I can send you a semi load of Kleenex.  You can have a valid gripe the day you either pay everyone else's sub or buy Dale out and you own the game.

That is one of the benefits of switching sides every now and then. You get to see the 'others' perspective. Which was funny for me when I did it, because it seemed like I hadn't changed sides at all. Same complaints of ENY, same complaints of 2 v 1 or "hoards" and same complaints of AFKers and the usual "forbidden ACM" stuffz.

[1Cane]

As you first stated only one country needs to be below 40% for a win and a map change. So now, we don't have to worry about even touching the other?

This could make map winning a bit easy and obviously will change the current system.

Now, for example, the Bish could ignore the Knights who are putting up fierce defense, and attack the Rooks who are defending little to none. It has happened many times where a country has lost 60% of their bases to the other countries, as this can't be all too hard, specifically  on small maps.

The point I'm trying to make is no perks awarded, no win is given we just move on to the next map!  If you look at the posted screen shot you will see that the Knights and Rooks were not fighting.

If your point is to" kick them while they're down" and not going for a tactical win by all means let's keep the system the way it is!

[matt]

Well bish did deliver unto us the vTwits, alchies, and Jokes, and Ghi. For better and worse, their "Win teh wArz!!!!" Reputation is somewhat deserved.

You reap what you sow, and right now the bish seem to be reaping a lot of hate.

Who cares i like when bish are getting rolled i like cheap 262s
 

[MrGeezer]

Amen.   Been flying deuces almost exclusively the last month.  I am personally appreciative.

[JunkyII]

Caldera's screenshot shows the bish had most in flight....why you no take those bases back?

[Bruv119]

I'll agree to the cease fire wish if the country looking for it get -100 perk points in each category as their humiliation payment. 

On the other hand this could lead to more bitterness in the future and start another map on the wrong moral compass leading to more tales of woe.     

[1Cane]

I'll agree to the cease fire wish if the country looking for it get -100 perk points in each category as their humiliation payment.  

On the other hand this could lead to more bitterness in the future and start another map on the wrong moral compass leading to more tales of woe.    

I believe that  Bruv119 is on to something here.  The two of the offending countries that have the primary country down below 40% and have only have 5% of one country should be penalized 100  perk points.  This would hopefully stop the gang-bang and force them to fight between themselves!

[SilverZ06]

I believe that  Bruv119 is on to something here.  The two of the offending countries that have the primary country down below 40% and have only have 5% of one country should be penalized 100  perk points.  This would hopefully stop the gang-bang and force them to fight between themselves!

I'm pretty sure you missed Bruv's point completely. He was not saying the offending countries get penalized. He was saying the losing country throwing up the white flag be penalized for being a bunch of pansies. At least that is the way I am reading it. 

[Zodiac]

That's the way I read it also Silver 


And:

Let the crook/gnats pile on.  If they have to double team bish -- so be it.  It's the highest compliment they can give -- to have to double team us to be happy.  Sad though.  Gnats used to be smart instead of being stooges to the crooks...who turn on them every time they want to get bases -- and like an abused spouse -- nits keep on going back with open arms after being turned on.  But that 's no biggie.  If two sides have to team up against the other let it happen.  

I'd rather have it that crooks & gnats double team us...it speaks volumes for what side is the real power in the game.

I'm not sure where to even start with the above