Author Topic: new ww2 movie  (Read 1223 times)

Offline gblade30

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 104
new ww2 movie
« on: June 13, 2014, 07:53:37 AM »
http://collider.com/fury-trailer-brad-pitt/#MJgAuGW3lxR4WKGQ.01

whats every1 think is this gonna be worth watching ????

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2014, 08:08:03 AM »
Quote
Shia LaBeouf, Michael Pena
There's 2 reasons it could really suck. I also have a suspicion they will show a single Sherman ripping through Tigers according to the story.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2014, 09:19:08 AM »
There's 2 reasons it could really suck. I also have a suspicion they will show a single Sherman ripping through Tigers according to the story.
Hopefully I'm wrong.

Yep, similar thoughts to mine, as long as Affleck shows up in a Pony shouting "hammer down" it should be a good flick :banana:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline gblade30

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 104
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2014, 09:46:57 AM »
There's 2 reasons it could really suck. I also have a suspicion they will show a single Sherman ripping through Tigers according to the story.
Hopefully I'm wrong.

thats what i thought too  :cheers:

Offline Blinder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2014, 10:02:17 AM »
Hopefully the attention to detail with regards to equipment is high for this one. Historical accuracy is paramount for the scrutinizing military history buff which most of us are. This makes me think back to Enemy at the Gates, which in itself, was a very good movie right up until the point where I spotted the dead T-34/85 in town.  :bhead

Hopefully Fury has a lock on the accuracy. 
Fighter pilots win glory .... Bomber pilots win wars.



17th Guards Air Assault Regiment (VVS) "Badenov's Red Raiders"

Offline tmetal

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2014, 10:27:19 AM »
One of the worst parts about these kind of movies for me are the interior shots. Some of the plane interior scenes in Red Tails made the insides of the plane look too big (the B17's crew/gunner areas especially), U571 was the same way. From the clip shown for Fury in your link it appears that the inside of the Sherman is quite spacious as well.  Maybe I'm full of it, but its those kinds of things that kill the immersion for me. (and scenes like the end of Red Tails when the main character takes several 30mm explosive shells to the chest, yet he somehow isn't turned into a red meaty goo spread over the cockpit :rolleyes:)

Still...I'm sure I'll end up watching Fury as it still looks much better than Monuments Men; might wait for it to hit the red-box kiosk though.
The real problem is anyone should feel like they can come to this forum and make a wish without being treated in a derogatory manner.  The only discussion should be centered around whether it would work, or how it would work and so on always in a respectful manner.

-Skuzzy 5/18/17

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2014, 11:22:26 AM »
Those of us who have studied the war, spoken with the veterans who were there, and have researched the hard data will have to keep in mind that this movie is for entertainment purposes.  On the same token, much of what is seen on the History Channel and Military Chanel is rather watered down so everyone watching it can grasp the "facts" and drama.  So be careful of what you see on TV or in the movies, period. Original sources, veteran testimony, and hard data from military testing/trials/engagements will take you, as an amateur historian, a lot further.  In the meantime just enjoy the movie and a bowl of popcorn, ok?   :D

Can a Sherman tank destroy a Tiger I?  Sure, under the right circumstances.   :aok 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Drano

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4156
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2014, 11:28:11 AM »
One of the worst parts about these kind of movies for me are the interior shots. Some of the plane interior scenes in Red Tails made the insides of the plane look too big (the B17's crew/gunner areas especially), U571 was the same way.

I guess they figure it's a logistics of filming thing is why they do this. But then you have a movie like Das Boot which literally oozed the claustrophobia of the tiny space of the u-boat BECAUSE of the way it was filmed. That's the effect I'd rather see projected.
"Drano"
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

FSO flying with the 412th Friday Night Volunteer Group

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2014, 12:06:41 PM »
One of the worst parts about these kind of movies for me are the interior shots.

Yeah, I can recall several B-movies from the 40's and 50's with tank interiors that looked more like handball courts. And anyone who's ever crawled up thru the forward crew hatch on a B-17 knows how spacious that airplane is.  :huh
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2014, 12:09:25 PM »
One of the worst parts about these kind of movies for me are the interior shots. Some of the plane interior scenes in Red Tails made the insides of the plane look too big (the B17's crew/gunner areas especially), U571 was the same way. From the clip shown for Fury in your link it appears that the inside of the Sherman is quite spacious as well.  Maybe I'm full of it, but its those kinds of things that kill the immersion for me. (and scenes like the end of Red Tails when the main character takes several 30mm explosive shells to the chest, yet he somehow isn't turned into a red meaty goo spread over the cockpit :rolleyes:)

Still...I'm sure I'll end up watching Fury as it still looks much better than Monuments Men; might wait for it to hit the red-box kiosk though.

Coupled with the fact that it took a British Military victory and portrayed it as a US one, along with the bumbling English duffers in the background :confused:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2014, 12:45:05 PM »
Just did some research on "Fury". Apparently they used a REAL Tiger (1st time in a film) for some of the filming. Still I suspect the movie to be "Hollywoodfied" to the point of being laughable. We'll see.
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2014, 01:30:33 PM »
Stalingrad had a good infantry vs tank battle until you spied the post WW2 tanks in the background behind the T34s. It was still a good scene, and you did capture the terror of such a fight, as long as you took it with a grain of salt.

Im sure they had no problem finding Shermans but are there even any rolling Tigers left? Or are they all going to have to be CG?

The myth still seems to persist the Sherman was a useless tank. The Shermans with their 17lb'ers were a great enough threat to tie down most of the best German armor around Caen allowing an allied break out. Even the 75mm could kill a Tiger but the Sherman really became a dangerous tank with the 76mm HV gun. One has to realize if there was ever terrain favorable to defense, and troops able to use such terrain, it was the German army in Normandy in the summer of '44.

There were some great panzer units in France at the time and they fought their tanks very well using all the advantages available.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3563
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2014, 02:12:00 PM »
too Hollywood prolly


Wasn't even familiar with a new Stalingrad release until now.


This Stalingrad was a good movie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalingrad_%281993_film%29

They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2014, 02:58:14 PM »
One of the worst parts about these kind of movies for me are the interior shots. Some of the plane interior scenes in Red Tails made the insides of the plane look too big (the B17's crew/gunner areas especially), U571 was the same way. From the clip shown for Fury in your link it appears that the inside of the Sherman is quite spacious as well.  Maybe I'm full of it, but its those kinds of things that kill the immersion for me. (and scenes like the end of Red Tails when the main character takes several 30mm explosive shells to the chest, yet he somehow isn't turned into a red meaty goo spread over the cockpit :rolleyes:)

Still...I'm sure I'll end up watching Fury as it still looks much better than Monuments Men; might wait for it to hit the red-box kiosk though.

Red Tails and U-571 are two of the worst films in the history of films!
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: new ww2 movie
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2014, 03:17:24 PM »
Red Tails and U-571 are two of the worst films in the history of films!

Indeed! 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.