« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: B-29 Question.  (Read 3472 times)

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2014, 01:40:25 PM »
Quote from: earl1937 on July 06, 2014, 01:45:15 PM
:airplane: Good to see yu sir, we been worried about where you been!

As much as possible I've been here:



Doing this.

Logged
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2014, 02:04:02 PM »
Way cool Colombo, I'm very jealous!  :salute
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2014, 04:46:38 PM »
Quote from: skorpx1 on July 04, 2014, 07:11:35 PM
Seeing that the B-29 was an exceptional bomber, and produced in massive amounts, why did it never see service in the European theater? With a 20k ord load you'd think that at least 100 B-29's flying over Berlin would have it leveled and wiped off the map within a week. Was there a reason why it only fought in the Pacific theater or was the 29 planned to be used in Europe?


I'd be googling this but I figured that i'd get more direct and clear answers here.

B-32s were the replacement bomber for Europe
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2014, 05:03:44 PM »
B-29 manual in pdf

http://aafcollection.info/items/documents/view.php?file=000576-01-00.pdf

Make sure to check out the main site > lots of other interesting stuff.
Logged

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2014, 07:01:02 PM »
Quote from: MiloMorai on July 07, 2014, 04:46:38 PM
B-32s were the replacement bomber for Europe

No.  The B-32 program was insurance in case the B-29 program failed, not that it was going to be the replacement bomber for Europe.  The USAAF didn't need a VLR bomber in Europe, it needed them in the Far East.

ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: B-29 Question.
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2014, 08:07:09 PM »
Quote from: Ack-Ack on July 07, 2014, 07:01:02 PM
No.  The B-32 program was insurance in case the B-29 program failed, not that it was going to be the replacement bomber for Europe.  The USAAF didn't need a VLR bomber in Europe, it needed them in the Far East.

ack-ack

Originally, the Army Air Forces intended the B-32 as a "fallback" design to be used only if the B-29 program fell significantly behind in its development schedule. As development of the B-32 became seriously delayed this plan became unnecessary due to the success of the B-29. Initial plans to use the B-32 to supplement the B-29 in re-equipping B-17 and B-24 groups before redeployment of the Eighth and Fifteenth Air Forces to the Pacific were stymied when only five production models had been delivered by the end of 1944, by which time full B-29 operations were underway in the Twentieth Air Force.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »