Author Topic: Katyusha  (Read 2093 times)

Offline bongboy1

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 179
      • Jokers Jokers
Katyusha
« on: September 05, 2014, 09:30:43 PM »
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyusha_rocket_launcher

wouldn't this be a great addition? Imagine a hoard of these rolling on a town  :O
Jokers Jokers

Offline Someguy63

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2014, 09:50:24 PM »
YES! :aok :aok :aok
Anarchy
#Taterz
-=Army of Muppets=-
"Imagination rules the world"

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2014, 02:00:45 AM »
You get more rockets with the M4, which we already have.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Tinkles

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2014, 03:24:55 AM »
You get more rockets with the M4, which we already have.

I think it would be something decent to add, while not necessary, even for variety.
+1
If we have something to show we will & do post shots, if we have nothing new to show we don't.
HiTech
Adapt , Improvise, Overcome. ~ HiTech
Be a man and shoot me in the back ~ Morfiend

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2014, 01:09:04 PM »
Katyusha is a psychological area denial weapon. It totally sucks at destroying anything intended.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2014, 03:37:30 PM »
You get more rockets with the M4, which we already have.

We get more bombs with a B-29, so why fly anything else....
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2014, 04:56:40 PM »
Well the katyusha fired a couple different rockets so it may have more fire power than the M4 rocket pack

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2014, 04:42:27 AM »
+1, if we get "land mode" gunnery for it. Cain't hit diddly with the M4 rockets m'self.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2014, 09:27:14 PM »
Well the katyusha fired a couple different rockets so it may have more fire power than the M4 rocket pack

according to Wikipedia there are a ton of varients of the katyusha. Two look like pretty good candidates. The BM-13 which was a ZIS-3 truck modified to carry up to 24 RS-132 Rocket rails, and the BM-13-16 using a lend lease truck platform and carrying 16 rails using the same rockets.
RS-132 rockets appear to have a 10.8lb HE warhead. I believe these are the same rockets available for the IL2.  The M8 rocket used in the M4 Calliope and on various US aircraft has a 4.3lb warhead.
Additionally it looks like these vehicles did not carry reloads themselves but were supplied from support vehicles.

If added to the game they could be reloaded from M3's or sdkfz 251's, and perhaps given a crude method to to aim such as "land mode" similar to what we have for ship guns.  



Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2014, 06:17:12 PM »
Nah. 

Go play with the M4 Calliope and you'll get the feeling for what the rockets can do.  On second thought.... actually the M4 Calliope can do a LOT more than the Katyusha. The M4 will shrug off town ack, MG fire and most aircraft gun fire, still able to help level a town with its main gun, and even destroy enemy gv's.  The Soviet truck that carries the katyusha would be nothing more than a tin can.

Oh... and I dare say to go learn how to effectively use the SdKfz 251.  You can heave 18 of the 28cm rockets, which are far greater damage than the ketyusha can offer, and still have MG's to defend yourself with.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2014, 09:54:36 PM »
I can never aim the Calliope worth a damn - just leave holes in fields close to town.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline FLOOB

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2014, 10:59:35 PM »
Nobody knows how to use the sadikifiz rockets at high angle! If somebody figures it out let us know.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans” - John Steinbeck

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2014, 04:54:20 AM »
some variants of the jeep could use rocket launchers.
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Aspen

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 692
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2014, 10:56:12 AM »
Maybe not as effective as the M4, but should be twice as fast.  On maps with long drives it would be fun to get there and blow up something quickly.
AMAX  in game

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Re: Katyusha
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2014, 02:30:49 PM »
The request would be better formed as a Studebaker truck and trailer in all it variants.

For truck read

Katyusha
Supply truck
Troop truck
Troop and supply truck

For trailer read

Katyusha
Supply trailer
Artillery piece
AA piece


Even better if such trucks were available in convoy.
Ludere Vincere