Author Topic: Ki-44  (Read 1798 times)

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2014, 11:49:49 AM »
+1 seems reasonable.

Offline Aspen

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 692
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:23 PM »
+1  I want them all eventually. 
AMAX  in game

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2014, 12:48:04 PM »
The niche between the Ki-43 and the Ki-84 does not seem to me to be the best gap to fill in the japanese planeset.   
Truthfully I'd rather see the Judy or the J2M.

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2014, 01:14:49 PM »
The niche between the Ki-43 and the Ki-84 does not seem to me to be the best gap to fill in the japanese planeset.   
Truthfully I'd rather see the Judy or the J2M.

I agree that Judy is the bigger gap in Japanese planeset but Ki-44 is far more important than J2M. It saw service in more units, larger numbers and longer than J2M.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2014, 01:16:54 PM »
I agree that Judy is the bigger gap in Japanese planeset but Ki-44 is far more important than J2M. It saw service in more units, larger numbers and longer than J2M.

Attach a Sparviero rider to this bill and it gets my vote.

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2014, 01:25:38 PM »
Attach a Sparviero rider to this bill and it gets my vote.

Why don't we let the threads to stay on topic instead of dropping "this is my own favorite -turd" to every topic?
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2014, 01:27:48 PM »
Why don't we let the threads to stay on topic instead of dropping "this is my own favorite -turd" to every topic?

Relax, Francis. This is how players collaborate. Its quite on topic. :D

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2014, 08:20:03 PM »
+1

We should focus on the Japanese plane set for a few updates.
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!

Offline Hetzer7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2014, 09:50:07 AM »
+1

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2014, 02:13:40 PM »
Wonder if Waffle will accidentally post some previews of rides that might be released with AH3. I really want a J3 with a bazooka under each wing.

I think the Ki-44 will have an ankle biter niche in the MA. I can imagine a few players who would take advantage of that. It looks like it might fly like the La7, just slower, except in a dive and maybe in a zoom. Four Ho-103 will not make it a snapshot wonder.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2014, 02:45:51 PM »
Wonder if Waffle will accidentally post some previews of rides that might be released with AH3. I really want a J3 with a bazooka under each wing.

I think the Ki-44 will have an ankle biter niche in the MA. I can imagine a few players who would take advantage of that. It looks like it might fly like the La7, just slower, except in a dive and maybe in a zoom. Four Ho-103 will not make it a snapshot wonder.

I have on unofficial lack of authority that this will be Italy's finest hour with the Sparviero and Falco leading the charge.  ;)

Offline pipz

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4899
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2014, 05:00:41 PM »
I endorse this wish 100%.   :old:  :aok
Silence tells me secretly everything.
                                                                     
Montreal! Free the Pitt Bulls!!!!!

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6911
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2014, 06:43:19 PM »
Flew it last night.........and it's not the end all late war monster but it does all things reasonably well and it has advantages over other planes in very specific parts of the envelope and, conversely, it has disadvantages in other places.

Great plane and fun to learn how to exploit it's strengths.

RE: Maneuverability..........the only japanese pilots who slagged it's turning had just gotten out of A6M2s and you heard the same complaints about other fighters like the J2M and even the KI84.


Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #28 on: October 07, 2014, 01:50:57 AM »
RE: Maneuverability..........the only japanese pilots who slagged it's turning had just gotten out of A6M2s

Pilots would not have gone from A6M2s (a Navy plane) to the Ki-44 (an Army plane), but rather from the Ki-27 or Ki-43 to the Ki-44.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Ki-44
« Reply #29 on: October 07, 2014, 04:13:12 PM »
At 184kg/sqm, Ki-44-II has roughly the same wing loading as a Bf109G-2. I'm sure the combat flaps effectively reduce its turn radius like they do for the two other Nakajima fighters in AH.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!